| Literature DB >> 36032045 |
Xiangpeng Lu1, Hao Han1, Zhi Biao Zhang1, Hao Chen2, Xingru Huang2, Rui Zhang1.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the application effect of Jiawei Sanyu Shengjing decoction combined with high ligation of the internal spermatic vein in male infertility patients with varicocele (VC).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032045 PMCID: PMC9410973 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2629140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech ISSN: 1176-2322 Impact factor: 1.664
Comparison of treatment effects between the two patient groups (n, %).
| Group | Number | Recovered | Obvious effect | Effective | Ineffective | Treatment effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 53 | 21 (39.62) | 15 (28.30) | 14 (26.42) | 3 (5.66) | 50 (94.34) |
| Control group | 53 | 18 (33.96) | 13 (24.53) | 11 (20.75) | 11 (20.75) | 42 (79.25) |
|
| 5.267 | |||||
|
| 0.022 |
Comparison of the serum indexes of the patients in the two groups ().
| Group | Number | LH (IU/L) | FSH (IU/L) | T (nmol/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 53 | 10.05 ± 1.54 | 4.69 ± 0.84∗ | 10.62 ± 1.84 | 6.05 ± 0.57∗ | 11.63 ± 2.51 | 14.62 ± 1.73∗ |
| Control group | 53 | 9.98 ± 1.18 | 5.88 ± 0.97∗ | 10.98 ± 1.89 | 7.91 ± 0.62∗ | 11.96 ± 2.64 | 16.94 ± 2.09∗ |
|
| 0.263 | 6.752 | 0.994 | 16.078 | 0.660 | 6.225 | |
|
| 0.793 | 0.000 | 0.323 | 0.000 | 0.511 | 0.000 | |
Note: compared with this group before treatment, ∗P < 0.05.
Comparison of the changes in semen treatment between the two groups ().
| Group | Number | The density of semen (×106/mL) | Sperm activity (%) | Rate of treat sperm (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 53 | 30.02 ± 1.54 | 50.62 ± 2.69∗ | 40.62 ± 5.91 | 55.18 ± 2.81∗ | 40.25 ± 6.59 | 31.02 ± 3.54∗ |
| Control group | 53 | 29.81 ± 1.47 | 45.18 ± 2.08∗ | 39.84 ± 5.82 | 50.24 ± 2.69∗ | 41.02 ± 6.91 | 34.69 ± 4.51∗ |
|
| 0.718 | 11.647 | 0.685 | 9.245 | 0.587 | 4.660 | |
|
| 0.474 | 0.000 | 0.495 | 0.000 | 0.558 | 0.000 | |
Note: compared with this group before treatment, ∗P < 0.05.