| Literature DB >> 36032044 |
Xiaorui Lv1, Jianlou Mu1, Wenxiu Wang1, Yaqiong Liu1, Xiaomin Lu2, Jianfeng Sun1, Jie Wang1, Qianyun Ma1.
Abstract
Anthocyanins are attractive alternatives to colorants; however, their low color stability hinders practical application. Copigmentation can enhance both the color intensity and color stability of complexes. Herein, we report an investigation of copigmentation reactions between purple sweet potato anthocyanins (PSA1) and phenolic acids (tannic, ferulic, and caffeic acids) or fatty acids (tartaric and malic acids) at pH 3.5. The effects of the mole ratios of the copigment and the reaction temperature were examined. In addition, quantum mechanical computations were performed to investigate molecular interactions. The optimum PSA:copigment molar ratio was found to be 1:100. The strongest bathochromic and hyperchromic effects were observed for copigmentation with tannic acid (Tan), which might be attributable to the fact that its HOMO-LUMO energy gap was the smallest among the investigated copigments, and because it has a greater number of phenolic aromatic and groups to form more van der Waals and hydrogen bond interactions. However, the formation of the PSA-caffeic acid (Caf) complex was accompanied by the greatest drop in enthalpy (-33.18 kJ/mol) and entropy (-74.55 kJ/mol), and this was the most stable complex at 90 °C. Quantum mechanical calculations indicated that hydrogen bonds and van der Waals force interactions contributed to the color intensification effect of copigmentation. These findings represent an advancement in our understanding of the properties of PSA, expanding the application scope of this natural product.Entities:
Keywords: Anthocyanin; BCPs, bond critical point; Bathochromic shift; CCPs, cage critical points; Caf, caffeic acid; Copigmentation; DFT, density functional theory; Fer, ferulic acid; HBs, hydrogen bond; Hyperchromic effect; IGM, independent gradient model; Mal, malic acid; PCG, petunidin-3-coumaroylrutinoside-5-glucoside; PSA, purple sweet potato anthocyanins; Quantum mechanic; RCPs, ring citica points; Tan, tannic acid; Tar, tartaric acid; vdWs, van der Waals
Year: 2022 PMID: 36032044 PMCID: PMC9404274 DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Res Food Sci ISSN: 2665-9271
Fig. 1Structure of the organic acids used as copigments in this study: (a) Fer, (b) Caf, (c) Tar, (d) Tan, (e) Mal, and (f) PCG.
PSA extract content.
| Anthocyanins | Retention time (min) | Observed [M]+ (m/z) | Theoretical [M]+ (m/z) | Mass error (ppm) | Fragment ions (m/z) | Relative contents (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peonidin-3-caffeoyl sophoroside-5-glucoside | 5.239 | 949.2628 | 949.2608 | 2.1069 | 787, 463, 301 | 8.27 ± 1.53 |
| 2 | Pelargonidin-3-feruloyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 5.244 | 917.2751 | 917.2710 | 4.4698 | 755, 433, 271 | 8.95 ± 0.84 |
| 3 | Malvidin-3-caffeoyl rutinoside-glucoside | 5.345 | 801.2248 | 801.2237 | 1.3729 | 493, 331 | 8.51 ± 0.61 |
| 4 | Peonidin-3-caffeoyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 5.349 | 933.2601 | 933.2659 | −6.2147 | 771, 463, 301 | 8.50 ± 1.76 |
| 5 | Malvidin-3-caffeoyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 5.365 | 963.2725 | 963.2765 | −4.1525 | 801, 493, 331 | 20.89 ± 3.65 |
| 6 | Cyanidin-3-O-rutinoside | 5.570 | 595.1633 | 595.1657 | −4.0324 | 449, 287 | 14.38 ± 3.89 |
| 7 | Peonidin-3-coumaroyl-5-glucoside | 6.073 | 609.1605 | 609.1602 | 0.4925 | 463, 301 | 3.72 ± 0.28 |
| 8 | Petunidin-3-coumaroyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 6.254 | 933.2594 | 933.2659 | −6.9219 | 711, 479, 317 | 51.39 ± 4.48 |
| 9 | Peonidin-3-coumaroyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 6.490 | 917.2681 | 917.2710 | −3.1616 | 755, 463, 301 | 23.85 ± 2.83 |
| 10 | Malvidin-3-coumaroyl rutinoside-5-glucoside | 6.528 | 947.2837 | 947.2816 | 2.2169 | 785, 493, 331 | 6.08 ± 0.45 |
Fig. 2Visible spectra of PSA (control) and PSA-copigments complexes with various PSA:copigments molar ratios ((a)–(e)).
Fig. 3Effect of intermolecular copigmentation on PSA absorption spectrum: (a) bathochromic shifts and (b) hyperchromic effects. According to the ANOVA Tukey test, the same letters above indicate not significant differences; (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 4Optimized structures, HOMOs, LUMOs, and HOMO-LUMO energy gaps ΔE of five acids calculated using DFT.
Fig. 5Comparison of the influence of temperature during copigmentation on PSA (control) and copigmented-PSA for different copigments: (a) Δλmax and (b) ΔAmax (%) at different temperatures for the different acids. (c) Plots of ln[(A−A0)/A0] vs ln[Cp]0 for selected copigmentation reactions of PSA. (d) Plots of ln[(A−A0)/A0] vs reciprocal temperature (1/T) for selected copigmentation reactions of PSA. According to the ANOVA Tukey test, the same letters above indicate not significant differences; (P ≤ 0.05).
Thermodynamic parameters for the copigmentation reactions between PSA and selected copigments.
| Copigmentation | Δ | Δ | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSA-Tan | 32.35 | 0.59 | −8.62 | −4.88 | −4.60 |
| PSA-Fer | 53.90 | 0.79 | −9.88 | −24.08 | −47.61 |
| PSA-Caf | 82.90 | 0.99 | −10.95 | −33.18 | −74.55 |
Fig. 6Optimized geometries of (a) PCG and (b) Fer. (c) Hydrogen bonds in PCG-Fer complex. (d) Weak interactions between PCG and Fer after optimization.