| Literature DB >> 36030481 |
Yun Zheng1, Shanjie Zha1, Weifeng Zhang1,2, Yinghui Dong1,3, Jing He1,3, Zhihua Lin1,3, Yongbo Bao4,5.
Abstract
The "Wanlihong" Meretrix meretrix (WLH-M) clam is a new variety of this species that has a red shell and stronger Vibrio tolerance than ordinary M. meretrix (ORI-M). To investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the WLH-M strain's tolerance to Vibrio, we challenged clams with Vibrio parahaemolyticus and then assessed physiological indexes and conducted transcriptome analysis and RNA interference experiments. The mortality, tissue bacterial load, and hemocyte reactive oxygen species level of ORI-M were significantly higher than those of WLH-M, whereas the content and activity of lysozyme were significantly lower. Gene Ontology functional annotation analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis revealed that immune and metabolic pathways were enriched in Vibrio-challenged clams. The expressions of the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and serine protease (SP) genes, which are involved in antibacterial immunity, were significantly upregulated in WLH-M but not in ORI-M, while the expression of the kynurenine 3-monooxygenase gene, a proinflammatory factor, was significantly downregulated in WLH-M. RNA interference experiments confirmed that Hsp70 and SP downregulation could result in increased mortality of WLH-M. Therefore, we speculate that Hsp70 and SP may be involved in the antibacterial immunity of WLH-M in vivo. Our data provided a valuable resource for further studies of the antibacterial mechanism of WLH-M and provided a foundation for the breeding of pathogen-resistant strains.Entities:
Keywords: Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70); RNA-seq; RNAi; Serine protease (SP); V. parahaemolyticus; “Wanlihong M. meretrix
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36030481 PMCID: PMC9420185 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-022-10156-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Biotechnol (NY) ISSN: 1436-2228 Impact factor: 3.727
Primers used in the qRT-PCR and RNAi
| Gene name | Sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|
| Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) | |
| GTAAAGGTCTCTGACTTTTGGAC | |
| TGGAATAGAACCTTCATCTTCACC | |
| CAAACTCACTCAGACTCCA | |
| CGAACCGAT TCAACACG | |
| CCTGGATACCCATCTACAC | |
| GCATACACGATCAACCCT | |
| ACGGGTTGGACTGGAAT | |
| TCTCCTGCGTTGGTTTG | |
| CCACCCTATGGATTTGTC | |
| TACGCTGTCACCTCTGCTTAT | |
| TTGTCTGGTGGTTCAACTATG | |
| TCCACATCTGCTGGAAGGTG | |
| RNA interference (RNAi) | |
| GGUACGUGUGUAAGGACAUTT | |
| AUGUCCUUACACACGUACCTT | |
| GGUUGGAUGCAAAGCUCUUTT | |
| AAGAGCUUUGCAUCCAACCTT |
Fig. 1The change of ORI-M and WLH-M with different concentrations of V. parahaemolyticus challenge. A, B Survival rate. C, D Bacterial load. *Significance is p < 0.05
Fig. 2Comparison of ROS content in hemocyte of ORI-M and WHL-M. VP indicates V. parahaemolyticus challenge. *Significance is p < 0.05
Fig. 3Comparison of lysozyme content and activity of the ORI-M and WLH-M. A Lysozyme content. B Lysozyme activity. Note that the VP indicates V. parahaemolyticus challenge. *Significance is p < 0.05
Fig. 4GO annotation of differential expression genes between the ORI-M and WLH-M. A, B The comparison between the gills and hepatopancreas of ORI-M in the control group and experimental group. C, D The comparison between the gills and hepatopancreas of WLH-M in the control group and the experimental group. Note that the BP indicates biological process, CC indicates cellular component, MF indicates molecular function
Fig. 5KEGG pathway of differential expression genes between the ORI-M and WLH-M. A, B The comparison between the gills and hepatopancreas of ORI-M in the control group and the experimental group. C, D The comparison between the gills and hepatopancreas of WLH-M in the control group and the experimental group. Note that the color depth of the circle indicates the size of the q-value. The smaller the q-value is, the closer the color is to red. The size of the dots indicates how many genes are differentially expressed in each pathway
Fig. 6The qRT-PCR validation of KMO, Hsp70, and SP. A The expression of KMO gene in gills. B, C The expression of Hsp70 and SP genes in hepatopancreas. *Significance is p < 0.05
Fig. 7The change of WLH-M after RNAi. A, B Relative expression of Hsp70 and SP. C Survival rate of WLH-M. *Significance is p < 0.05