| Literature DB >> 36030276 |
Jingjing Cui1, Zhengguo Cui2, Yang Lu2, Xiaofei Lv3, Qingjun Cao4,5, Yunlong Hou2, Xiangyu Yang2, Yan Gu6.
Abstract
Lodging resistance is a critical trait in modern maize breeding. This study aimed to examine maize stalk lodging and its related characteristics in response to increasing planting densities in modern hybrids. A two-year field trial was conducted from 2018 to 2019 with two widely grown commercial hybrids ('Xy335' and 'Fm985') and three planting density treatments of 4.5 × 104 (low density, LD), 6.5 × 104 (medium density, MD), and 8.5 × 104 plants/ha (high density, HD). New hybrid Fm985 had a significantly higher grain yield and lower lodging rate at HD, while there was no significance at LD and MD. Compared to Fm985, old hybrid Xy335 had a significantly high plant height, ear and gravity height, and culm length (CL) across the three planting densities, while opposite stalk bending strength (SBS), dry weight per unit length (DWPU), cross-sectional area, and the cellulose and lignin content in the basal internode were low. Correlation and path analysis revealed that kernel number per ear and lodging rate directly contributed to maize grain yield, while lodging-related traits of SBS, stem lignin, and DWPU had an indirect effect on maize grain yield, suggesting that modern hybrid maize yield enhancement is associated with greater stalk lodging resistance at a high planting density in northeast China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36030276 PMCID: PMC9420147 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18908-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Comparison of maize grain yield, and lodging rate in 2018 (a) and 2019 (b) at varied planting densities. LD, MD, and HD represent low, medium, and high planting densities, respectively. Bars denote the SE of the mean (n = 3). ns, not significant (P > 0.05), ** and *** indicate differences of grain yield significant at 0.01and 0.001levels, # and ### indicate differences of lodging rate significant at 0.01and 0.001levels.
Output of three-way ANOVA on the effects of the year (Y), Hybrid (H), planting density (PD), and their interactions.
| Y | C | PD | Y × C | Y × PD | C × PD | Y × C × PD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GY | ns | * | ** | ns | ns | *** | ns |
| LR | * | *** | *** | ns | ** | ns | ns |
| ENPS | * | * | ** | * | ns | ns | * |
| KNPE | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| HGW | ** | * | ** | ns | ns | ** | ns |
| PH | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns |
| EH | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | * | ns |
| GH | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | * | ns |
| DWPU | ns | * | *** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| CL | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| CSA | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| SBS | ns | ** | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Cellulose | ns | ** | * | ns | ns | ** | ns |
| Lignin | ns | * | * | ns | ** | ** | ns |
GY, grain yield; LR, lodging rate; ENPS, ear number per ha; KNPE, kernel number per ear; HGW, 100-grain weight; PH, plant height; EH, ear height; GH, gravity height; DWPU, dry weight per unit length; CL, culm length; CAS, stem cross-section area; SBS, stem bending strength; Cellulose, cellulose content; Lignin, lignin content.
Maize yield components under different treatments in 2018 and 2019. LD, MD, and HD represent low, medium, and high planting densities, respectively. Mean ± S.E (n = 3).
| Year | Hybrid | Ear number per ha (× 104) | Kernel number per ear | 100-grain weight (g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LD | MD | HD | LD | MD | HD | LD | MD | HD | ||
| 2018 | Xy335 | 4.48 ± 0.02 | 6.12 ± 0.06 | 8.00 ± 0.07 | 567.03 ± 17.50 | 522.28 ± 3.79 | 482.16 ± 4.70 | 34.55 ± 0.25 | 32.49 ± 0.34 | 28.87 ± 0.24 |
| Fm958 | 4.47 ± 0.02 | 6.29 ± 0.06 | 8.23 ± 0.07 | 587.31 ± 8.53 | 522.28 ± 10.16 | 475.49 ± 8.95 | 33.38 ± 0.59 | 32.80 ± 0.31 | 32.20 ± 0.64 | |
| 2019 | Xy335 | 4.46 ± 0.02 | 6.20 ± 0.05 | 7.88 ± 0.07 | 568.64 ± 23.52 | 521.22 ± 10.52 | 483.23 ± 5.77 | 31.59 ± 0.30 | 29.60 ± 0.89 | 27.31 ± 0.60 |
| Fm958 | 4.45 ± 0.05 | 6.26 ± 0.05 | 8.25 ± 0.03 | 562.03 ± 11.15 | 522.28 ± 6.90 | 475.49 ± 6.65 | 31.40 ± 0.33 | 30.99 ± 0.12 | 29.19 ± 0.56 | |
Plant architecture and stem morphological characteristics under different treatments.
| Year | Hybrid | PD | Plant architecture | Stem morphological characteristics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH (cm) | EH (cm) | GH (cm) | DWPU (g cm−1) | CL (cm) | CSA (cm2) | |||
| 2018 | Xy335 | LD | 319.37 ± 3.0a | 107.91 ± 1.1c | 104.34 ± 0.77c | 0.79 ± 0.06a | 285.33 ± 1.76c | 565.87 ± 9.36a |
| MD | 317.93 ± 2.7a | 108.56 ± 0.6c | 106.59 ± 0.59c | 0.53 ± 0.03c | 292.67 ± 3.93b | 454.16 ± 9.67b | ||
| HD | 327.04 ± 1.3 | 112.80 ± 1.1b | 117.10 ± 1.10a | 0.43 ± 0.04d | 302.33 ± 3.18a | 439.81 ± 24.04b | ||
| Fm985 | LD | 305.64 ± 2.9b | 107.79 ± 1.4b | 103.20 ± 1.17c | 0.73 ± 0.04a | 273.33 ± 4.25d | 511.66 ± 18.09ab | |
| MD | 295.34 ± 1.5b | 108.62 ± 1.3b | 104.85 ± 0.45c | 0.65 ± 0.02b | 283.00 ± 3.78c | 460.54 ± 10.75b | ||
| HD | 298.55 ± 3.2b | 111.26 ± 1.1a | 103.51 ± 1.66c | 0.59 ± 0.02b | 281.00 ± 3.53c | 406.46 ± 17.13c | ||
| 2019 | Xy335 | LD | 314.34 ± 4.6a | 109.64 ± 0.8b | 110.41 ± 0.95b | 0.77 ± 0.02a | 290.00 ± 2.99b | 529.84 ± 17.09a |
| MD | 312.78 ± 5.6a | 111.39 ± 21.3ab | 113.78 ± 2.10b | 0.59 ± 0.01b | 289.33 ± 3.84b | 436.75 ± 25.91b | ||
| HD | 320.52 ± 2.7a | 123.63 ± 3.80a | 116.94 ± 1.88a | 0.47 ± 0.01d | 300.33 ± 5.45a | 370.24 ± 23.85c | ||
| Fm985 | LD | 305.32 ± 4.1b | 105.31 ± 1.66c | 110.84 ± 2.54b | 0.75 ± 0.11a | 286.00 ± 5.29bc | 455.13 ± 31.36b | |
| MD | 300.92 ± 3.3b | 106.35 ± 2.11c | 105.20 ± 1.96b | 0.60 ± 0.02b | 285.00 ± 3.21c | 438.64 ± 10.89c | ||
| HD | 296.04 ± 3.3b | 108.65 ± 1.57c | 106.95 ± 1.61b | 0.56 ± 0.01c | 287.67 ± 4.70b | 406.08 ± 15.24c | ||
PD, planting density; PH, plant height; EH, ear height; GH, gravity height; DWPU, dry weight per unit length; CL, culm length; CAS, stem cross-section area. Mean ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a statistically significant difference at 0.05 level.
Figure 3The stem cellulose content in 2018 (a) and 2019 (b), and lignin content in 2018 (c) and 2019 (d) under different treatments. LD, MD and HD represent low, medium and high planting densities, respectively. Bars denote the SE of the mean (n = 4).
Figure 4Correlation analysis between lodging rate and lodging-related characteristics. The red and blue colors present a positive and negative correlation, respectively; * and ** indicate differences significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively.
Figure 5Path analysis of maize grain yield, yield component, SBS and plant architecture characteristics.
Figure 6Path analysis of SBS, stem morphology and structural carbohydrates content.
Figure 7Rainfall and monthly mean temperature recorded during maize growing season (April to October) of experiment in 2018 (a) and 2019 (b).
Characteristics of maize hybrids used in the experiments.
| Hybrid | Seed company | Year of release | Relative maturity | Density-tolerance | Endosperm type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xy335 | DuPont Pioneer | 2004 | 125 | High | Flint |
| Fm985 | Fumin Seed Company | 2015 | 127 | High | Flint |
Figure 8Schematic diagram of the method for measuring the height of the center of gravity (a) and culm length (b) of maize plants.
Figure 9Schematic diagram of the method for measuring the stalk bending strength of maize plants.