Literature DB >> 36029752

Multiple sclerosis relapse after COVID-19 vaccination: A case report-based systematic review.

Fardin Nabizadeh1, Elham Ramezannezhad2, Kimia Kazemzadeh3, Elham Khalili4, Elham Moases Ghaffary5, Omid Mirmosayyeb6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns about vaccination increased among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regarding side effects, efficacy, and disease exacerbation. Recently there were reports of MS relapses after the COVID-19 vaccination, which emerged the safety concerns. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review of case reports and case series studies to investigate the MS relapses after COVID-19 vaccination with most details.
METHODS: We systematically searched three databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, in February 2022. Case reports and case series which reported relapse after COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients were eligible to include in our study.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in our systematic review after the abstract and full-text screening with a total of 29 cases. The mean duration between COVID-19 vaccination and relapse appearance was 9.48 ± 7.29 days. Among patients, 22 cases experienced relapse after their first dosage of the COVID-19 vaccine, one after the second dose, and five after the booster dose. The type of vaccine was unknown for one patient. The most common symptoms of relapses were sensory deficits (paresthesia, numbness, dysesthesia, and hypoesthesia) and weakness.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the COVID-19 vaccination may trigger relapses in some MS patients, but as the infection itself can stimulate relapse, the benefit of vaccination outweighs its risk in this population, and mass vaccination against COVID-19, especially in MS patients, should be continued and encouraged.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 vaccination; Exacerbation; Multiple sclerosis; Relapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36029752      PMCID: PMC9388441          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   2.116


Introduction

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is responsible for coronavirus infection, was declared a worldwide pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020 [1]. Vaccination against COVID-19 is the primary long-term strategy to stop this pandemic globally [2]; thus, worldwide initiatives were done to develop vaccines against this pandemic which has claimed over 6 million lives and affected over 500 million people as of April 2022 [3]. Patients with comorbidities, especially autoimmune diseases, have been considered at higher risk to develop a more severe form of the disease [4]. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2021 showed the pooled prevalence of suspected covid-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) was 4%, hospitalization was 10%, and death in hospitalized patients was 4% [5]. MS is the most prevalent disabling permanently neurological disease among young adults and is associated with high socioeconomic cost and diminished quality of life [6]. Infectious diseases are the leading cause of death and a common cause of comorbidity among patients with MS and may cause the exacerbation of MS symptoms; thus, vaccination in patients with MS should be purposed as a general policy to decrease the risk of infections [6]. Concerns about vaccination increased among health care providers and patients with MS regarding side effects, efficacy, and disease exacerbation [7]. Neurological manifestations are rare complications of COVID-19 infection and vaccination [8]. Among neurological manifestations, autoimmune disorders which affect the nervous system are rare (<0.1%) after COVID-19 vaccination [9]. In another study, after the first dose of Pfizer BioNTech and AstraZeneca vaccines, the most common complications were Guillain–Barré syndrome and Bell’s palsy [10]. Recently there were reports of MS relapses after the COVID-19 vaccination, which emerged safety concerns [11], [12], [13]. A study by Fragoso et al. revealed that patients with no evidence of MS activity and no change in their medications developed a new relapse with new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) along with increased disability following their first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine for COVID-19 [14]. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review of case reports and case series studies to investigate the MS relapses after COVID-19 vaccination with most details.

Methods

This study was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline [15].

Search strategy

We systematically searched three databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, in February 2022. Our search strategy included the following terms: (Multiple sclerosis) AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-COV-2 OR corona virus OR Coronavirus Disease OR 2019-nCoV Disease) AND (Vaccination OR Vaccine OR immunization).

Eligibility criteria

All case reports and case series which reported relapse after COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients were eligible to include in our study. The non-English article, studies with other vaccination for another virus, review papers, and other types of original studies (cohorts, case-control, and clinical trials) were excluded.

Study selection

Two independent reviewers (F.N, K.K) screened the title and abstracts and excluded irrelevant studies. Then the same reviewers checked the full text of the remaining articles to evaluate their eligibility to include in our study.

Data extraction

The same investigators (F.N, K.K) extracted the following information based on a predesigned datasheet: Study the demographic, type of MS, age, sex, MS duration, clinical presentation before relapse, MRI findings, type of COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine dosage, the interval between relapse and vaccination, the clinical presentation of relapse, treatments, and outcomes.

Quality assessments

The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Reports independently by two reviewers (F.N, K.K) [16]. The answer to the questions was based on “Yes” or “No” and the score ranged from 0 to 8.

Results

Our initial search yielded 1386 studies (Fig. 1 ). After duplicate removing, 779 papers were screened. At this step, 686 articles were excluded via title and abstract evaluation, and the remaining studies underwent full-text review. Finally, seven studies entered our systematic review [11], [12], [13], [14], [17], [18], [19]. The demographical and clinical characteristics of included studies are detailed in Table 1 . A total of 29 cases with a mean age of 43.2 ± 11.5 and a range [22-66] were included in our study. 68% of the patients were female, and eight cases were reported as RRMS. The mean duration between COVID-19 vaccination and relapse appearance was 9.48 ± 7.29 days (Fig. 2 ). Twelve patients received Oxford/AstraZeneca, twelve received PfizerBioNTech, two Moderna, and each one received Sputnik and Sinopharm (Fig. 2). Among patients, 22 cases experienced relapse after their first dosage of the COVID-19 vaccine, one after the second dose, and five after the booster dose. The type of vaccine was unknown for one patient. The most common symptoms of relapses were sensory deficits (n = 14) (paresthesia, numbness, dysesthesia, and hypoesthesia) and weakness (n = 6). After relapse, most of the patients received glucocorticoids, and 13 patients recovered, five partially recovered, and five patients not yet recovered until the end of the study follow-up (see Fig. 3 ).
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review.

Table 1

Demographical and clinical findings of the included studies.

StudyCountryType of MSAgeSexMS disease durationClinical presentation of MS before relapseDMTsMRI FindingsType COVID-19 vaccineVaccine dosageTime interval between vaccination and relapseRelapse clinical presentationsTreatmentsOutcome
Lagosz et al. 2022PolandNR64MNRNRNRA hypodense lesion in the left frontal-parietal areaNRNR1 dayFeeling numbness, worsened mobility in the arms and fatigueGlucocorticoidsRecovered
Kataria et al. 2022USANR57F6 yearsNRInterferon-betaMultiple confluent and distinct hyperintense white matter enhancing lesions in both hemispheres on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images. Spine MRI was normal.BNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech2nd18 daysFatigue, involuntary eye movements, numbness, tingling, stiffness in her left upper and lower limbsIntravenous methylprednisolone and physiotherapy , baclofenRecovered
Etemadifar et al. 2021IranRRMS34F13 yearsoptic neuritis and bilateral lower limb paresthesia / paraparesisInterferon-beta 1a.Several new periventricular, juxtacortical and brainstem lesions on T2Sputnik1st3 daysSevere right hemiplegia and ataxiaOral methylprednisolone for 3 weeksRecovered
Ahadi et al. 2021IranRRMS42F20 yearsoptic neuritis/ hemiparesthesia and monoparesis/ paraparesisInterferon-beta 1b.Showed numeral periventricular, anterior medullary white matter hyper-intensitiesSinopharm1st2 daysProgressive paraparesis without paresthesiaIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
Maniscalco et al. 2021ItalyNR31F5 yearsTinnitus and dizzinessFingolimodThree new voluminous enhancing lesionsBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st48 hoursParaesthesia and weakness in her left arm and limbsIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
Fragoso et al. 2021BrazilRRMS22F5 yearsNRFingolimodNon-Gd tumefactive lesionOxford/AstraZeneca1st7 daysFacial paralysis, hemiparesis, ataxiaPulsotherapy methylprednisoloneNot yet recovered
RRMS32F2 yearsNRDimethyl fumarateNew Gd + lesions in the left eyeOxford/AstraZeneca1st10 daysLoss of vision and papillitis in the left eyePulsotherapy methylprednisolone ImmunoglobulinPartial recoved
SPMS35M3 yearsNRNatalizumabHigh lesion load , new lesionsOxford/AstraZeneca1st7 daysWorsening of disability, could not walk, severe weakness of both legsOral prednisoneNot yet recovered
RRMS30F1 yearNRNatalizumabNew Gd + lesionsOxford/AstraZeneca1st25 daysRight hemiparesisPulsotherapy methylprednisoloneRecovered
RRMS42F3 yearsNRFingolimodNew Gd+ lesions in spinal cord, T2 levelOxford/AstraZeneca1st15 daysRapidly progressive weakness in both arms , grade III at its worstPulsotherapy methylprednisoloneRecovered
RRMS35M4 yearsNRTeriflunomideNew Gd+ lesions in brainstemOxford/AstraZeneca1st20 daysIncoordination of right arm and handPulsotherapy methylprednisoloneNot yet recovered
PPMS51M2 yearsNRNRNew Gd+ lesions in cervical cordOxford/AstraZeneca1st25 daysHypoesthesia in both armsNo treatmentNot yet recovered
RRMS32F6 yearsNRGlatiramer acetateNew Gd+ lesions+ new lesionsOxford/AstraZeneca1st7 daysMotor and sensitive deficits in right leg and footPulsotherapy methylprednisoloneNot yet recovered
Nistri et al. 2021
Italy
NR48FNew diagnosisvisual acuity deficit from right eyeNREnhancing lesion in the corpus callosum, multiple white matter unenhanced lesions and lesions in the occipital lobe were detectedOxford/AstraZeneca1 st8 daysVisual acuity deficit from right eyeHigh dose of intravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR45M9 yearsNROcrelizumabTwo new lesions in the temporal gyri and a new spinal cord lesion at T3 levelOxford/AstraZeneca1st3 weeksDysesthesia in both legsSteroidsNR
NR54F28 yearsNRNROne enhancing lesion in the spinal cordOxford/AstraZeneca1 st3 daysDeveloped hypoesthesia below the T6 levelIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR66FNew diagnosisvisual disturbance and postural instability on the right limbsNRMultiple white matter lesions, four of them enhancing in the left paratrigonal and periventricular white matterOxford/AstraZeneca1 st1 weekVisual disturbance and postural instability on the right limbsIntravenous methylprednisolonePartial recovered
NR42F2 yearsprogressive weakness on the right side of bodyOcrelizumabEnhancing brain lesion in the right corona radiataModerna1 st2 weeksSlight weakness of the left upper limbNRNR
NR57M20 yeasNRNREnhancing pontine lesionModernabooster2 weeksSevere motor deficit in both legsIntravenous methylprednisolonePartial recovered
NR49F8 yearsNRDimethyl fumarateA periventricular lesion and a spinal lesion at C3 level, both enhancingBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1 st5 daysNumbness on the left hand and left side of her headIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR39M7 yearshypoesthesia on left sideDimethyl fumarateThree new lesions, two of which were enhancing in the left parietal lobe and in the periventricular white matterBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st10 daysParesthesia on left legOral steroidsPartial recoverd
NR39FNew diagnosisNRNRA new enhancing lesion in the mesencephalonBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st3 daysDysesthesia on her right hand and footIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR60F23 yearsNRDimethyl fumarateOne enhancing brain lesion in the left periventricular white matterBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st2 daysFatigue and numbness in both legsNRNR
NR30F3 yearsoptic neuritisCladribineTwo enhancing brain lesions, one in the right corona radiata and one with conspicuous oedema in the left centrum semiovaleBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTechbooster20 daysLanguage disturbanceNRNR
NR58F21 yearsNRNRA new area with ring enhancement in the white matter of the left frontal lobeBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st3 daysHeadache, balance disturbance, urinary incontinence, difficulties in walking and dysphagiaIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR34F3 monthsnumbness and hyposthenia on her right handNRThree brain enhancing lesion (one right posterior paraventricular and two in the left periventricular white matter) and a new unenhanced lesion on spinal cordBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTechbooster4 daysNeck pain and hypoesthesia on right armNRNR
NR35F16 yearsNRDimethyl fumarateThree enhancing lesions in the left temporal lobe and left centrum semiovaleBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTechbooster1 dayParesthesia on the left side of bodyNRNR
NR54M18 yearsNRTeriflunomideTwo ring-enhancing lesions located in the left periventricular white matterbNT162b2/PfizerBioNTech1st1 weekRight hemiparesisIntravenous methylprednisoloneRecovered
NR37M2 yearsNRDimethyl fumarateA new tumefactive contrast-enhancing lesion in the left fronto-parietal white matterBNT162b2/PfizerBioNTechbooster11 daysWeakness on right limbsIntravenous methylprednisolonePartial recovered

Abbreviations: NR, Not Reported, RRMS, relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, DMTs, disease modyfing therapies.

Fig. 2

The mean duration between vaccination and relapse based on type of vaccine (A), and type of COVID-19 vaccine used among cases (B).

Fig. 3

Mechanism of relapse in patients with MS following COVID-19 vaccination, by BioRender.

PRISMA flow diagram depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. Demographical and clinical findings of the included studies. Abbreviations: NR, Not Reported, RRMS, relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, DMTs, disease modyfing therapies. The mean duration between vaccination and relapse based on type of vaccine (A), and type of COVID-19 vaccine used among cases (B). Mechanism of relapse in patients with MS following COVID-19 vaccination, by BioRender. The result of the quality assessment using JBI criteria revealed that six studies scored more than 7, and only one study scored 5 (Table 2 ). The mean JBI score for all included studies was 7.28.
Table 2

The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Reports.

Lagosz et al. 2022Kataria et al. 2022Etemadifar et al. 2021Ahadi et al. 2021Maniscalco et al. 2021Fragoso et al. 2021Nistri et al. 2021
Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described?NoYesYesYesYesYesYes
Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline?NoNoYesYesYesYesNo
Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described?YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described?YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described?NoYesYesYesYesYesYes
Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described?YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described?YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Does the case report provide takeaway lessons?YesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Total rank5788887
The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Reports.

Discussion

Although mass vaccination against COVID-19 is the preferred way of controlling the disease, concerns around the long-term safety of these vaccines have remained unclear, in particular in patients with underlying comorbidities [20]. Autoimmune disorders comprise a group of these comorbidities for which vaccination may trigger undesired responses. Post-vaccination relapses in neurological autoimmune disorders such as MS and Guillen Barre have been previously reported with HBV, Influenza, polio, and tetanus vaccines [21], [22]. Available COVID-19 vaccines are no exception, and reports of Bell's palsy, transverse myelitis, Guillen Barre syndrome and MS relapses have emerged [23]. To the current time point, there is no contraindication for COVID-19 vaccination in MS patients except for living attenuated vaccines in patients under immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory regimens [24]. In addition, no vaccine is favored for MS patients [14]. However, reports of relapses after either first or booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines indicate an association between disease pathophysiology and vaccination. In an interval ranging from one to 25 days after vaccination, a portion of MS patients manifested neurological symptoms, with the most common ones being paralysis, visual loss, weakness, and motor deficits. The extent of immune response in MS patients depends on both individual genetic susceptibility, and the type of vaccine used [13], [25]. Cross-reactivity and bystander activation are well-established theories justifying autoimmunity after vaccination. Depending on the vaccine type, one of these mechanisms may be more relevant. In the case of Pfizer, which is an RNA virus coding for spike proteins in lipid membrane without any adjuvant, cross-reactivity may explain the situation as the COVID-19 spike protein antibody is structurally similar to myelin basic protein [25]. Besides, the interaction between spike proteins and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors located in the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) and spinal neurons have been reported in several in vivo studies [26]. This is true for Coronavirus itself, as it can cross BBB either with transcytosis using ACE2 receptors or reach brain parenchyma via the olfactory bulb [14]. However, autoimmunity after the AstraZeneca vaccine is less likely to happen because of this cross-reactivity. AstraZeneca has an adjuvant (MF59) that has clearly been shown to induce inflammation by secretion of cytokines, including IL-6, IL-8, chemokine CCL-2, CCL-3, and CCL-4 [27]. The adjuvant can activate the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) that per se prompts nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) phosphorylation. NF-κB is a transcription factor of up to 1500 inflammatory genes, including cytokines and chemokines. These molecules supply T and B cells with adequate stimuli to recognize their specific antigen and initiate clonal activation. In MS patients, these inflammatory molecules can interfere with control over self-reacting clones and activate unrelated lymphocytes, something that is called bystander activation [28], [29]. In this way, clonal expansion occurs, and the disease relapses. Despite the fact that these relapses were temporally associated with vaccine administration, with current studies, it is impossible to disentangle post-vaccination relapses from the relapses that would have manifested regardless of COVID-19 vaccination [13]. In a study on 555 MS patients, 2.1% of patients receiving the first dose and 1.6% with the second dose experienced relapses; however, no difference in the relapse rate was highlighted when the results were compared to previous years [30]. This study was limited to a short follow-up period and therefore its results should be interpreted with caution. More studies are warranted to show a causal association. Overall, the COVID-19 vaccination may trigger relapses in some MS patients but as the infection itself can stimulate relapse, the benefit of vaccination outweighs its risk in this population, and mass vaccination against COVID-19 especially in MS patients should be continued and encouraged [31]. In the meanwhile, most of the relapsed cases were fully recovered after receiving methylprednisolone showing the relapse can be controlled without consequences [11], [13], [14], [17], [18].

Funding

We do not have any financial support for this study.

Ethical approval

Since the data in this paper were obtained from the PPMI database (ppmi.loni.usc.edu), it does not include any research involving human or animal subjects.

Availability of data and material

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available upon request with no restriction.

Consent for publication

This manuscript has been approved for publication by all authors.

Author contributions

All the authors listed in the manuscript have participated actively in preparing the final version of this case report.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  1 in total

Review 1.  Seasonal and monthly variation in multiple sclerosis relapses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fardin Nabizadeh; Parya Valizadeh; Maryam Yazdani Tabrizi; Kimia Moayyed; Niousha Ghomashi; Omid Mirmosayyeb
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.471

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.