Mohammad Amin Sadeghi1,2, Sara Hemmati3, Ehsan Nassireslami1,2, Mojtaba Yousefi Zoshk4, Yasaman Hosseini5, Kourosh Abbasian6, Mohsen Chamanara7,8. 1. Toxicology Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Cognitive Neuroscience Center, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Management and Health Economics Department, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 7. Toxicology Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. chamanaramohsen@gmail.com. 8. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. chamanaramohsen@gmail.com.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Current pharmacological approaches to treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) lack adequate effectiveness. As a result, identifying new molecular targets for drug development is necessary. Furthermore, fear learning and memory in PTSD can undergo different phases, such as fear acquisition, consolidation, and extinction. Each phase may involve different cellular pathways and brain regions. As a result, effective management of PTSD requires mindfulness of the timing of drug administration. One of the molecular targets currently under intense investigation is the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR). However, despite the therapeutic efficacy of drugs targeting NMDAR, their translation into clinical use has been challenging due to their various side effects. One possible solution to this problem is to target signaling proteins downstream to NMDAR to improve targeting specificity. One of these proteins is the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), which is activated following calcium influx through the NMDAR. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we review the literature on the pharmacological modulation of nNOS in animal models of PTSD to evaluate its therapeutic potential. Furthermore, we attempt to decipher the inconsistencies observed between the findings of these studies based on the specific phase of fear learning which they had targeted. RESULTS: Inhibition of nNOS may inhibit fear acquisition and recall, while not having a significant effect on fear consolidation and extinction. However, it may improve extinction consolidation or reconsolidation blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of nNOS has therapeutic potential against PTSD and warrants further development for use in the clinical setting.
RATIONALE: Current pharmacological approaches to treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) lack adequate effectiveness. As a result, identifying new molecular targets for drug development is necessary. Furthermore, fear learning and memory in PTSD can undergo different phases, such as fear acquisition, consolidation, and extinction. Each phase may involve different cellular pathways and brain regions. As a result, effective management of PTSD requires mindfulness of the timing of drug administration. One of the molecular targets currently under intense investigation is the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR). However, despite the therapeutic efficacy of drugs targeting NMDAR, their translation into clinical use has been challenging due to their various side effects. One possible solution to this problem is to target signaling proteins downstream to NMDAR to improve targeting specificity. One of these proteins is the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), which is activated following calcium influx through the NMDAR. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we review the literature on the pharmacological modulation of nNOS in animal models of PTSD to evaluate its therapeutic potential. Furthermore, we attempt to decipher the inconsistencies observed between the findings of these studies based on the specific phase of fear learning which they had targeted. RESULTS: Inhibition of nNOS may inhibit fear acquisition and recall, while not having a significant effect on fear consolidation and extinction. However, it may improve extinction consolidation or reconsolidation blockade. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of nNOS has therapeutic potential against PTSD and warrants further development for use in the clinical setting.
Authors: Francesco Saverio Bersani; Owen M Wolkowitz; Daniel Lindqvist; Rachel Yehuda; Janine Flory; Linda M Bierer; Iouri Makotine; Duna Abu-Amara; Michelle Coy; Victor I Reus; Elissa S Epel; Charles Marmar; Synthia H Mellon Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Thomas C M Bienvenu; Cyril Dejean; Daniel Jercog; Bruno Aouizerate; Maël Lemoine; Cyril Herry Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Daniele C Aguiar; Sara C Hott; Milena V Deolindo; Francisco S Guimarães; Leonardo Bm Resstel Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Lynnette A Averill; Prerana Purohit; Christopher L Averill; Markus A Boesl; John H Krystal; Chadi G Abdallah Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 3.046