Literature DB >> 3602170

Craniosynostosis: an analysis of the timing, treatment, and complications in 164 consecutive patients.

L A Whitaker, S P Bartlett, L Schut, D Bruce.   

Abstract

Treatment options for the craniosynostoses vary from conservative observation until completion of growth to radical remodeling in infancy. To further define the timing and type of treatment necessary in these complex disorders, we have retrospectively analyzed all patients operated on for this deformity during the past 12 years. One-hundred and sixty-four patients with craniosynostosis were analyzed and subgrouped into asymmetrical (predominantly unilateral) and symmetrical (bilateral) deformities, in addition to segregation by age and type of procedure performed. This was done recognizing that no deformity, like no normal human face, is truly symmetrical. Results of treatment were categorized on the basis of the need for additional surgery and varied from no refinements necessary (category I) to major reduplication of the initial procedure (category IV). Analysis of the data led us to conclude that excellent results can be expected in the asymmetrical deformities group treated in infancy by a unilateral approach. Similarly, for the mild symmetrical deformities, treatment at this time by bilateral orbital advancement gives satisfactory results in the majority of patients. By contrast, the more severe symmetrical groups treated in childhood have a high incidence of requiring secondary major reconstructions, and consideration should be given to delaying craniofacial surgery until age 7 or older, although earlier cranial surgery may be advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3602170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  35 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS : MANAGEMENT IN INFANCY.

Authors:  M M Harjai; B Puri; A K Dubey; B M Nagpal; Y Singh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 3.  Skull vault growth in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Spyros Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Autosomal dominant holocalvarial craniosynostosis.

Authors:  G Pillar; M Zaaroor; R Gershoni-Baruch
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Assessing aesthetic outcomes after trigonocephaly correction.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Wolfgang Zemann; Christine Jacobsen; Heinz-Theo Lübbers; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Joachim Anton Obwegeser
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-17

Review 6.  Non-syndromic oxycephaly and brachycephaly: a review.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Philippe Pellerin; Marc Baroncini; Alexis Wolber; Patrick Dhellemmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Atypical scaphocephaly: a review.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Philippe Pellerin; Pierre Guerreschi; Marc Baroncini; Patrick Dhellemmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  Models of cranial suture biology.

Authors:  Monica Grova; David D Lo; Daniel Montoro; Jeong S Hyun; Michael T Chung; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Advancement-onlay: an improved technique of fronto-orbital remodeling in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  S R Cohen; H K Kawamoto; F Burstein; W J Peacock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  The shell technique: bilateral fronto-orbital reshaping in trigonocephaly.

Authors:  Concezio Di Rocco; Paolo Frassanito; Gianpiero Tamburrini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.