Literature DB >> 3602032

Quantitative determination of the effects of catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation.

C R Gallistel, G Freyd.   

Abstract

The effects of amphetamine, clonidine, molindone, pimozide and yohimbine on the rewarding efficacy of electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat were determined from the effects of these drugs on the rate-frequency function, which is the plot of the rat's rate of pressing a lever against the frequency of the pulses in a rewarding train of fixed duration. These catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists produced dose-dependent alterations in the measurable rewarding efficacy, but only up to a factor of about 2, even though the method is capable of measuring 25-30-fold changes. At elevated doses, the effects on rewarding efficacy became unmeasurable, because the animals would not consistently self-stimulate at any parameters of stimulation. Amphetamine (0.5-3 mg/kg) enhanced rewarding efficacy. Clonidine (0.05-0.4 mg/kg), molindone (0.25-1 mg/kg) and pimozide (0.1-0.6 mg/kg) attenuated it. Pimozide and clonidine were equipotent despite their radically different receptor affinities. The effects of pimozide, clonidine and amphetamine were approximately additive (amphetamine cancelled the effects of pimozide and clonidine, while clonidine augmented the effect of pimozide). The alpha 2 antagonist yohimbine (0.05-10 mg/kg) had the same effect as the alpha 2 agonist clonidine (attenuation of rewarding efficacy), but these effects did not combine additively: yohimbine neither cancelled nor augmented the effect of clonidine. It is suggested that catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists do not alter the magnitude of the rewarding signal by acting on postsynaptic receptors in the reward pathway; rather, they may drive beyond functional limits a variable that is crucial to the proper recording of the magnitude of the rewarding signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3602032     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(87)90605-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  23 in total

1.  Mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) and intracranial self-stimulation in C57BL/6J mice: comparison to cocaine.

Authors:  J Elliott Robinson; Abigail E Agoglia; Eric W Fish; Michael C Krouse; C J Malanga
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Chronic low-dose haloperidol effects on self-stimulation rate-intensity functions.

Authors:  M R Lynch; R J Carey
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Corticosteroid dependent and independent effects of a cannabinoid agonist on core temperature, motor activity, and prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Avdesh Avdesh; Vincent Cornelisse; Mathew Thomas Martin-Iverson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Behavioral evidence of depolarization block of dopamine neurons after chronic treatment with haloperidol and clozapine.

Authors:  S M Boye; P P Rompré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Phencyclidine-induced potentiation of brain stimulation reward: acute effects are not altered by repeated administration.

Authors:  W A Carlezon; R A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Behavioral and cellular pharmacology characterization of 17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14β-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-(isoquinoline-3'-carboxamido)morphinan (NAQ) as a mu opioid receptor selective ligand.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Amanda Braithwaite; Yunyun Yuan; John M Streicher; Edward J Bilsky
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Qualitative differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in morphine potentiation of brain stimulation reward and intravenous self-administration.

Authors:  Greg I Elmer; Jeanne O Pieper; Lindsey R Hamilton; Roy A Wise
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Withdrawal from chronic amphetamine elevates baseline intracranial self-stimulation thresholds.

Authors:  R A Wise; E Munn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.