Literature DB >> 36018483

Predicting student outcomes using digital logs of learning behaviors: Review, current standards, and suggestions for future work.

Cara J Arizmendi1, Matthew L Bernacki2, Mladen Raković3, Robert D Plumley2, Christopher J Urban2, A T Panter2, Jeffrey A Greene2, Kathleen M Gates2.   

Abstract

Using traces of behaviors to predict outcomes is useful in varied contexts ranging from buyer behaviors to behaviors collected from smart-home devices. Increasingly, higher education systems have been using Learning Management System (LMS) digital data to capture and understand students' learning and well-being. Researchers in the social sciences are increasingly interested in the potential of using digital log data to predict outcomes and design interventions. Using LMS data for predicting the likelihood of students' success in for-credit college courses provides a useful example of how social scientists can use these techniques on a variety of data types. Here, we provide a primer on how LMS data can be feature-mapped and analyzed to accomplish these goals. We begin with a literature review summarizing current approaches to analyzing LMS data, then discuss ethical issues of privacy when using demographic data and equitable model building. In the second part of the paper, we provide an overview of popular machine learning algorithms and review analytic considerations such as feature generation, assessment of model performance, and sampling techniques. Finally, we conclude with an empirical example demonstrating the ability of LMS data to predict student success, summarizing important features and assessing model performance across different model specifications.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data privacy; Digital data; Equity; Learning management system; Machine learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36018483     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01939-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  5 in total

1.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.

Authors:  F ROSENBLATT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The statistical organization of nervous activity.

Authors:  W S McCULLOCH; W PITTS
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1948-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Are your students ready for anatomy and physiology? Developing tools to identify students at risk for failure.

Authors:  Amy Gultice; Ann Witham; Robert Kallmeyer
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course.

Authors:  Mohammed Saqr; Uno Fors; Matti Tedre
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Evaluation of the lasso and the elastic net in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Patrik Waldmann; Gábor Mészáros; Birgit Gredler; Christian Fuerst; Johann Sölkner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.