| Literature DB >> 36017376 |
Mercè Vidal Flor1, Margarida Jansà I Morató1, Carmen Yoldi Vergara2, Roque Cardona-Hernández2, Marga Giménez Alvárez1, Ignacio Conget Donlo1, Pilar Isla Pera3.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is especially complex during adolescence when youths are transferred to adult care centres. The objectives of this qualitative study were to: a) determine the expectations of young T1D patients prior to transfer, b) evaluate the transfer process between the 2 centres, and c) evaluate the therapeutic education and care programme (TECP) in the adult centre from their point of view. Material andEntities:
Keywords: Type 1 diabetes; adolescents; patient experience; qualitative research; therapeutic patient education; transition to adult care
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017376 PMCID: PMC9397429 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S363081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence ISSN: 1177-889X Impact factor: 2.314
Healthcare Process During the First Year After the Transfer of T1D Patients from a Paediatric to an Adult Centre (Therapeutic Education and Care Programme TECP-Transferred)
| Previous to Phase 1 | 1. Coordination paediatric/adult centre appointment | ● Before paediatric discharge a visit is requested to facilitate the administrative work to the patient and/or family. |
| Phase 1 | 2. Initial joint visit. Endocrinologist and nurse in adult centre | ● Perception and expectations of the patient |
| Phase 2 | 3. Homogenous group course. | Introduction of participants to educators (members of the healthcare team. Difficulties in the follow-up of diabetes Expectations related to the course |
| Phase 3 | 4. Individual visit with nurse at 3 months | Revision and reevaluation of objectives AGEED UPON in the initial visit. Difficulties and proposals for improvement. |
| 5. Individual visit with nurse at 6 months | Adaptation schedule and education reinforcement for treatment self-management. | |
| 6. Individual visit with the endocrinologist at 9 months | - Revision of clinical and laboratory results. | |
| Phase 4 | 7. Individual visit with the nurse. | Adaptation schedule and education reinforcement for treatment self-management. |
| Usual follow-up of the visits in the OPC with the endocrinologist according to the frequency of the tertiary level hospital (3 annual visits, although the frequency may be increased, or a new care and therapeutic education programme may be planned if necessary). | ||
| Possibility of telephone contact with the Day Hospital, educators, or mobile endocrinology emergencies 24 hours/day, 365 days/year. | ||
Abbreviations: HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; CH, carbohydrates; ISF, insulin sensitivity factor; I/CH ratio, insulin/carbohydrate ratio; BMI, body mass index; DKQ2, Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire 2; DQOL, specific type 1 diabetes quality of life questionnaire; SF12, general health-related quality of life questionnaire; Clarke, questionnaire on the perception of symptoms of hypoglycaemia; SCI-R.es, questionnaire on adherence to treatment self-management; EAT26, eating behaviour questionnaire; OPC, outpatient consultation.
Figure 1Flow Chart of the participants’study.
Characteristics of the Youths Transferred from the Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (HSJD) Who Participated in the Discussion Groups and/or Interviews
| 1st Discussion Group Carried Out by T1D Youths in the HSJD. November 2017 | 2nd Hospital Clínic February 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Year of Birth | Years of T1D Evolution | Activity | CVRF | Type of Treatment | Living with Parents | |
| Ricardo | 1999 | 8 | Studying | No | IP | Yes | DG |
| Jaume | 1999 | 7 | Studying | Tobacco | MID | Yes | DG |
| Carla | 1999 | 14 | Studying | No | MID | No | Interview |
| Natalia | 1999 | 9 | Studying | Tobacco | IP | Yes | Interview |
| Joaquín | 1999 | 6 | Studying | No | MID | Yes | |
| Valentina | 2000 | 4 | Studying | No | MID | Yes | |
| Montse | 1999 | 15 | Studying | Alcohol | MID | Yes | |
| Discussion Group Performed by T1D youths in the Hospital Clínic 2 Years After transfer. November 2017 | |||||||
| Ramon | 1998 | 7 | Studying | No | MID | Yes | DG |
| Joana | 1996 | 8 | Studying | No | MID | Yes | DG |
| Mario | 1996 | 8 | Studying | No | MID | Yes | DG |
| Roger | 1997 | 3 | Studying | Tobacco | MID | Yes | DG |
Note: The name of the participants is fictitious to maintain anonymity, although the sex has been maintained.
Abbreviations: T1D, type 1 diabetes; CVRF, cardiovascular risk factors; MID, multiple insulin doses; IP, insulin pump; DG, discussion group.
Experience of the Youths Prior to Transfer
| Living with diabetes | Negative event, especially during adolescence. |
| Social aspects | Perception that their friends protect and support them. |
| Quality of healthcare and therapeutic education | Positive evaluation despite claims for psychological support and more information on complications and investigation. |
| Transfer to adult hospital | Generates anxiety and missing paediatric centre but accept the change. |
| Proposals for improvement | Make first visit with professionals from both centres. |
Experience of Youths with T1D Post Transfer
| Coordination | Positive evaluation. Good coordination between centres. |
| Adult age and autonomy | More autonomous and free from parental control despite believing that it is too quick. |
| Visits, types and frequency | Similar to the paediatric hospital during the first year. |
| Group course | Believe reinforcement not necessary. Changes in methodology: less discussion of cases and more discussion of own experiences. |
| Social networks | Consume less. Clarify concepts with professional. |
| Proposals for improvement | Adapt group course content |
Strong and Weak Points and Proposals for Programme Improvement. Youths with T1D Prior to and Following Transfer
| Youths with T1D Prior to Transfer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Strong Points | Weak Points | Proposals for Improvement |
| - Logical and irreversible. | - Generates anxiety and missing of paediatric professionals. | - Visit without the presence of the family to consult emotional and personal aspects. |
| - Good coordination | - Process too quick. | - Able to choose day and time of visits. |