| Literature DB >> 36017230 |
Mostafa Qorbani1,2, Negar Movasaghi2, Nami Mohammadian Khonsari3, Elnaz Daneshzad1, Gita Shafiee2, Haleh Ashraf4,5, Leily Sokoty1,6, Armita Mahdavi-Gorabi1, Mehdi Ebrahimi7, Ramin Heshmat2, Roya Kelishadi8.
Abstract
Introduction: Metabolic syndrome comprises a set of metabolic risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Zinc plays an essential role in numerous enzyme functions that may be associated with metabolic dysfunctions. The relationship between serum zinc levels and metabolic syndrome in adolescents has not been specifically studied. Therefore, this study was performed to determine the relationship between serum zinc levels and metabolic syndrome in Iranian children and adolescents. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was performed using data collected in the CASPIAN-V study. In this project, data were collected using interviews, examinations, biochemical assessments, anthropometric studies, and the nutritional status of participants. The variables considered in this study included serum zinc levels, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), fasting blood sugar, height, weight, abdominal circumference, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.Entities:
Keywords: CASPIAN-V; adolescents; children; metabolic syndrome; zinc
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017230 PMCID: PMC9396024 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.932746
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Demographic status of the study population according to the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome (n = 1371).
| Variables | Total | Metabolic syndrome | ||
| Yes | No | |||
| Female | 675 (49.2) | 39 (5.8) | 636 (94.2) | 0.340 |
| Male | 696 (50.8) | 49 (7.0) | 647 (93.0) | |
| Rural | 370 (27) | 19 (5.1) | 351 (94.9) | 0.238 |
| Urban | 1001 (73.0) | 69 (6.9) | 932 (93.1) | |
| Age (year) | 12.24 (3.22) | 11.81 (3.23) | 12.29 (3.24) | 0.184 |
| Weight (kg) | 42.64 (16.50) | 42.69 (15.90) | 42.54 (16.41) | 0.934 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18.99 (4.82) | 19.23 (4.21) | 18.96 (4.89) | 0.618 |
| WC (cm) | 67.70 (11.72) | 69.13 (12.79) | 67.54 (11.76) | 0.225 |
| NC (cm) | 30.23 (3.71) | 30.01 (3.51) | 30.26 (3.73) | 0.531 |
| Wrist Circumference (cm) | 15.12 (2.11) | 15.39 (2.36) | 15.12 (2.11) | 0.247 |
| Hip Circumference (cm) | 78.89 (14.99) | 79.44 (15.77) | 78.91 (14.96) | 0.748 |
| WHtR | 0.46 (0.06) | 0.47 (0.06) | 0.46 (0.06) | 0.136 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 101.33 (13.46) | 101.45 (16.29) | 101.35 (13.36) | 0.947 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 65.45 (10.76) | 64.81 (11.85) | 65.46 (10.78) | 0.589 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 88.08 (44.58) | 109.29 (68.25) | 86.62 (41.18) |
|
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 152.95 (26.57) | 154.27 (24.88) | 152.51 (26.70) | 0.550 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 88.77 (22.60) | 88.21 (21.10) | 88.59 (22.62) | 0.880 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 46.88 (9.24) | 45.78 (11.27) | 46.88 (9.08) | 0.283 |
| FBS (mg/dl) | 93.16 (8.64) | 99.26 (8.65) | 92.95 (8.32) |
|
| Serum Zinc (μ g/dL) | 107.23 (25.81) | 110.60 (29.84) | 107.02 (25.59) | 0.211 |
|
| ||||
| Low | 1044 (76.1) | 70 (6.7) | 974 (93.3) | 0.440 |
| High | 327 (23.9) | 18 (5.5) | 309 (94.5) | |
|
| ||||
| Low | 471 (34.4) | 33 (7.0) | 438 (93.0) | 0.327 |
| Moderate | 490 (35.7) | 25 (5.1) | 465 (94.9) | |
| High | 410 (29.9) | 30 (7.3) | 380 (92.7) | |
|
| ||||
| Low | 370 (27.0) | 23 (6.2) | 347 (93.8) | 0.732 |
| Moderate | 569 (41.5) | 34 (6.0) | 535 (94.0) | |
| High | 432 (31.5) | 31 (7.2) | 401 (92.8) | |
BMI, Body Mass Index; WC, Waist Circumference; WHtR, waist-to-height ratio; NC, Neck Circumference; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, Triglyceride; LDL, Low-density Lipoprotein; HDL, High-density Lipoprotein; FBS, Fasting Blood Sugar; ST, screen time (above 2 h per day are regarded as high, otherwise as low); PA, physical activity; SES, socioeconomic status.
Data presented as mean (SD) and number (%) for quantitative and qualitative variables, respectively.
SES,PA and other abbreviations are listed under the table or their definition can be found in the methods, or under the bolded variable.
Association between metabolic syndrome components and dyslipidemia with serum zinc level in children: linear regression analysis.
| Variables | β | Standard error | |
|
| |||
| Crude model | 0.30 | 0.29 | 0.291 |
| Adjusted model | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.419 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.417 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | 0.08 | 0.47 | 0.853 |
| Adjusted model | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.751 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.748 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | 0.07 | 0.37 | 0.850 |
| Adjusted model | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.649 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.640 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | –0.13 | 0.31 | 0.666 |
| Adjusted model | –0.07 | 0.31 | 0.804 |
| Adjusted + BMI | –0.07 | 0.31 | 0.804 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | –0.27 | 0.75 | 0.716 |
| Adjusted model | –0.15 | 0.76 | 0.836 |
| Adjusted + BMI | –0.15 | 0.76 | 0.839 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | 1.09 | 1.49 | 0.463 |
| Adjusted model | 0.87 | 1.50 | 0.561 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 0.87 | 1.50 | 0.562 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | –0.10 | 0.89 | 0.907 |
| Adjusted model | 0.07 | 0.90 | 0.937 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 0.07 | 0.90 | 0.936 |
|
| |||
| Crude model | 0.16 | 0.41 | 0.692 |
| Adjusted model | 0.004 | 0.37 | 0.991 |
FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; WC, waist circumference.
Adjusted model: Variables were controlled for age, gender, socioeconomic status, physical activity, residential region, and screen time. Moreover, MetS components except for WC were adjusted for one more confounder (BMI).
Association between metabolic syndrome components and dyslipidemia with tertiles of serum zinc in children: logistic regression analysis.
| Variables | Serum Zinc tertiles | |||
| 1 (< 94) | 2 (94–113) | 3 (113 <) | ||
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 0.75 (0.43; 1.30) | 1.08 (0.64; 1.80) | 0.751 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 0.73 (0.42; 1.27) | 1.01 (0.60; 1.70) | 0.938 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.87 (0.89; 3.91) | 1.91 (0.91; 4.02) | 0.097 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.78 (0.84; 3.74) | 1.61 (0.76; 3.43) | 0.253 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 1.80 (0.85; 3.78) | 1.62 (0.76; 3.45) | 0.249 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.15 (0.66; 1.98) | 0.81 (0.45; 1.48) | 0.526 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.05 (0.60; 1.84) | 0.76 (0.41; 1.41) | 0.400 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 1.08 (0.61; 1.90) | 0.77 (0.41; 1.43) | 0.417 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.17 (0.81; 1.68) | 1.19 (0.82; 1.73) | 0.347 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.13 (0.78; 1.64) | 1.19 (0.81; 1.74) | 0.364 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 1.14 (0.78; 1.65) | 1.19 (0.81; 1.74) | 0.371 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 0.99 (0.73; 1.35) | 1.19 (0.88; 1.62) | 0.241 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.00 (0.73; 1.36) | 1.19 (0.88; 1.62) | 0.246 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 0.99 (0.73; 1.35) | 1.19 (0.88; 1.62) | 0.247 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.17 (0.83; 1.66) | 1.03 (0.71; 1.48) | 0.878 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.18 (0.83; 1.68) | 1.04 (0.72; 1.50) | 0.812 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 1.19 (0.83; 1.69) | 1.05 (0.72; 1.51) | 0.794 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 0.91 (0.67; 1.22) | 1.16 (0.87; 1.56) | 0.295 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 0.89 (0.66; 1.19) | 1.12 (0.83; 1.50) | 0.440 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 0.89 (0.66; 1.20) | 1.12 (0.83; 1.50) | 0.435 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.02 (0.52; 1.99) | 0.68 (0.32; 1.45) | 0.337 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.03 (0.53; 2.02) | 0.70 (0.33; 1.51) | 0.389 |
| Adjusted + BMI | 1 | 1.03 (0.53; 2.02) | 0.70 (0.33; 1.51) | 0.389 |
|
| ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 1.30 (0.96; 1.78) | 1.30 (0.95; 1.78) | 0.106 |
| Adjusted model | 1 | 1.22 (0.89; 1.67) | 1.20 (0.87; 1.66) | 0.261 |
MetS, metabolic syndrome; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar.
Adjusted model: Variables were controlled for age, gender, socioeconomic status, physical activity, residential region, and screen time. Moreover, MetS components except for abdominal obesity were adjusted for one more confounder (BMI).
-High blood pressure and abdominal obesity cut-offs are based on the 90th percentile or higher based on height, weight, age, and gender. TG, TC, LDL, HDL, and FBS cutoffs were 150, 200, 130, 40, and 100 mg/dL, respectively.