| Literature DB >> 36017218 |
Ziyang Wu1,2,3, Dan Qin1,2,3, Hehe Li2,3, Dongqi Guo1, Huan Cheng1, Jinyuan Sun2,3, Mingquan Huang2,3, Xingqian Ye1, Baoguo Sun2,3.
Abstract
Three different extraction methods were used to extract high-temperature water-extracted pectin (HWp), high-temperature acid-extracted pectin (HAp), and high-temperature alkali-extracted pectin (HALp) from Lycium ruthenicum. The physicochemical properties, structure, and functional properties of three different pectins were studied. The results showed that HWp and HALp can extract rhamnogalacturonan-I (RG-I) from L. ruthenicum better. Through structural feature analysis, HWp and HALp have a branched structure, and HWp has a higher degree of esterification than HAp and HALp. Zeta potential results show that HWp solution is more stable. The thermal analysis results show that the thermal stability is HALp > HAp > HWp. HWp has the highest viscosity. The inhibitory activity results showed that HWp, HAp, and HALp have a certain inhibitory effect on α-glucosidase activity. This study shows the effects of different extraction methods on the properties of L. ruthenicum pectin and aims to provide a theoretical basis for the pharmaceutical and food industries to choose more suitable pectin extraction methods.Entities:
Keywords: Lycium ruthenicum; extraction methods; functional properties; pectin; physicochemical properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017218 PMCID: PMC9395692 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.946606
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Yields and the chemical compositions of HWp, HAp, and HALp.
| HWp | HAp | HALp | |
| Yield (%, w/w) | 3.83 ± 0.73 | 6.77 ± 0.54 | 6.19 ± 0.71 |
| Total sugar (%, w/w) | 65.86 ± 1.74 | 65.15 ± 2.68 | 70.85 ± 1.17 |
| Total phenolic content (μg GAE/mg) | 11.96 ± 1.65 | 18.91 ± 1.69 | 17.09 ± 1.64 |
| Total protein content (%, w/w) | 4.77 ± 0.64 | 5.82 ± 0.77 | 6.43 ± 0.41 |
|
| |||
| Fuc | 0.92 ± 0.15 | 0.59 ± 0.11 | 0.81 ± 0.01 |
| Rha | 2.70 ± 1.45 | 6.02 ± 0.54ab | 8.12 ± 0.91 |
| Ara | 38.16 ± 3.73 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 38.31 ± 1.46 |
| Gal | 20.67 ± 2.40 | 26.94 ± 1.37 | 18.46 ± 0.94 |
| Glu | 5.35 ± 1.50 | 11.40 ± 1.02 | 3.00 ± 0.16 |
| Xyl | 5.31 ± 1.90 | 17.69 ± 4.29 | 4.98 ± 0.50 |
| GalA | 23.23 ± 4.77 | 33.22 ± 0.37 | 23.60 ± 0.77 |
| GluA | 3.66 ± 0.32 | 3.33 ± 0.13 | 2.73 ± 0.03 |
| HG | 20.53 ± 3.30 | 27.20 ± 0.39 | 15.48 ± 0.26 |
| RG-I | 64.23 ± 9.03 | 39.79 ± 0.23 | 73.00 ± 4.21 |
| (Gal+Ara)/Rha | 21.79 ± 2.27 | 4.61 ± 0.24c | 6.99 ± 0.30 |
Means that the data has significant differences.
The molecular parameters of HWp, HAp, and HALp.
| Mass fraction (%) | HWp | HAp | HALp | |||
| Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | |
| 34.8 | 65.2 | 19.7 | 80.3 | 53.1 | 46.9 | |
| Mw (g/mol) | (3.445 ± 0.029) × 106 | (1.271 ± 0.017) × 105 | (2.469 ± 0.028) × 105 | (3.973 ± 0.149) × 104 | (5.311 ± 0.020) × 106 | (9.440 ± 0185) × 104 |
| Mn (g/mol) | (2.353 ± 0.017) × 106 | (1.173 ± 0.017) × 105 | (1.551 ± 0.024) × 105 | (3.547 ± 0.147) × 104 | (1.459 ± 0.005) × 106 | (7.615 ± 0.143) × 104 |
| Polydispersity (Mw/Mn) | 1.464 ± 0.016 | 1.084 ± 0.021 | 1.592 ± 0.030 | 1.120 ± 0.063 | 3.641 ± 0.019 | 1.240 ± 0.034 |
| Rz (nm) | 138.900 ± 0.972 | 38.400 ± 1.382 | 25.600 ± 1.536 | 44.600 ± 3.390 | 49.900 ± 0.349 | 52.700 ± 1.634 |
FIGURE 1(A) FT-IR spectra of HWp, HAp, and HALp; (B) characterization of pectin helical structure at different concentrations; (C) thermodynamic properties of HWp, HAp, and HALp: TGA analysis.
FIGURE 2SEM imaging of HWp (A), HAp (B), and HALp (C).
FIGURE 3AFM imaging of HWp (A), HAp (B), and HALp (C).
FIGURE 4Rheological characterization of HWp, HAp, and HALp: (A) flow behavior and (B) frequency sweep of modulus G′ and G″.
Parameters of flow curves obtained by fitting to power law model.
| Sample | Concentration (w/v %) | κ (Pa⋅s |
|
|
| HWp | 15% | 0.126 | 0.595 | 0.996 |
| HAp | 15% | 0.002 | 0.913 | 0.830 |
| HALp | 15% | 0.002 | 0.938 | 0.823 |
FIGURE 5Different concentrations of HWp, HAp, HALp, and acarbose glucosidase inhibition efficiency.