| Literature DB >> 36017152 |
Xiaomin Zhu1, Ying Xu1, Xuefei Hu1, Hong Ye1, Jun Xiao2.
Abstract
In this study, 897 surgical instruments used for comprehensive management of hand supply from January to December 2019 were selected as the control group. Similarly, 1086 surgical instruments administered with 6Sigma from January to December 2020 were selected as the observation group. By observing and comparing the differences between the two groups of patients in the operating room equipment cleaning pass rate and general indicators, other related pass rate, operating room equipment defects, and doctors' satisfaction with equipment, to explore the application value and influence of comprehensive nursing in operating room and disinfection supply center combined with 6Sigma management in operating room equipment management. The results show that the application of hand-supply integration combined with 6Sigma management has a good effect on operating room equipment management, which significantly improves the qualified rate of operating room equipment cleaning and the satisfaction of doctors to the equipment, and reduces the defects of operating room equipment, which has a certain reference value for operating room equipment management.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017152 PMCID: PMC9398843 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8490473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Figure 1The research procedure.
Comparison of the qualification rate of equipment cleaning in the operating room between the two groups [n (%)].
| Group | Tissue forceps qualification rate | Qualified rate of hemostatic forceps | S hook qualification rate | Qualified rate of needle holder | Qualification rate of cavity mirror |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (897) | 206 (95.37) | 162 (82.65) | 126 (86.90) | 113 (89.68) | 37 (75.51) |
| Observation group (1086) | 319 (96.67) | 211 (91.74) | 139 (97.89) | 141 (95.92) | 132 (96.35) |
|
| 4.417 | 4.235 | 4.079 | 32.810 | 139.501 |
|
| 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.039 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Comparison of other relevant qualification rates [n (%)].
| Group | Sterilization qualification rate | Loss attrition rate | Goods packaging qualification rate | Equipment damage rate | Late delivery rate of equipment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (897) | 886 (98.77) | 862 (96.10) | 126 (14.10) | 793 (88.41) | 787 (87.74) |
| Observation group (1086) | 1082 (99.63) | 1061 (97.70) | 119 (10.96) | 1071 (98.61) | 1079 (99.36) |
|
| 4.817 | 4.285 | 4.329 | 87.462 | 117.693 |
|
| 0.028 | 0.031 | 0.037 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Comparison of equipment defects in the operating room between the two groups [n (%)].
| Group | Inappropriate placement | Not registered after use | Not repaired in time | Parts are not matched | Not ready | Poor function |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (897) | 22 (24.53) | 49 (54.63) | 32 (35.67) | 27 (30.10) | 25 (27.87) | 19 (21.18) |
| Observation group (1086) | 13 (11.97) | 12 (11.05) | 16 (14.73) | 18 (16.57) | 14 (12.89) | 8 (7.37) |
|
| 4.467 | 29.899 | 9.121 | 4.052 | 5.717 | 6.981 |
|
| 0.035 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.044 | 0.017 | 0.008 |
Two groups of physicians' satisfaction with devices [n (%)].
| Group | Very satisfied | Satisfy | Generally | Dissatisfied | Satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group (897) | 640 | 122 | 100 | 35 | 862 (96.10) |
| Observation group (1086) | 582 | 230 | 270 | 4 | 1082 (99.63) |
|
| / | / | / | / | 31.814 |
|
| / | / | / | / | 0.000 |