| Literature DB >> 36017023 |
Lingjia Shi1, Dan Yang2, Xin Wang3.
Abstract
For the treatment of trichomonas vaginitis, a combination therapy of metronidazole vaginal effervescent tablet combined with Flavescentis Sophora suppository is proposed. The patients diagnosed with trichomonas vaginitis are divided into the conventional treatment group and the joint group. The conventional group is treated with metronidazole vaginal effervescent tablets, and the joint group is treated with metronidazole vaginal effervescent tablets combined with sophora bolt. Both groups are treated for 3 months to observe the therapeutic effect of the two treatment methods. The expressions of IL-2 and IL-13 in serum of patients are detected by the ELISA. The changes in the vaginal pH value and cleanliness at each time point are observed. The patients are followed up for 6 months after treatment in order to observe the recurrence of trichomonas vaginitis in both groups. Experimental results show that the combination of the two tablets can further improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the inflammatory response and effectively improve the PH value and cleanliness of the vagina, and the recurrence rate is lower, which is worthy of clinical application.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36017023 PMCID: PMC9371805 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1250755
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
The baseline data.
| Conventional group ( | Combined group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 34.42 ± 7.63 | 34.17 ± 7.58 | 0.163 | 0.871 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.33 ± 2.15 | 23.25 ± 2.14 | 0.185 | 0.854 |
| Course of the disease (month) | 11.15 ± 3.36 | 11.21 ± 3.28 | −0.089 | 0.929 |
| Level of education | ||||
| Primary and below | 12 (24.49%) | 11 (22.45%) | 2.363 | 0.732 |
| Junior to senior high | 28 (57.14%) | 30 (61.22%) | ||
| University and above | 9 (18.37%) | 8 (16.33) | ||
Figure 1Technology roadmap of this study.
Therapeutic response rate.
| Group |
| Cured | Significant effect | Effective | Ineffective | Effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 18 (36.73%) | 21 (42.86%) | 7 (14.29%) | 3 (6.12%) | 46 (93.88%) |
| Conventional group | 49 | 7 (14.29%) | 17 (34.69%) | 15 (30.61%) | 10 (20.41%) | 39 (79.59%) |
|
| 4.346 | |||||
|
| 0.037 |
The trend of IL-2 changes.
| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 9.34 ± 2.19 | 7.22 ± 1.98 | 6.18 ± 1.63∗# | 5.24 ± 1.25∗#& | 6.642 | <0.001 |
| Conventional group | 49 | 9.32 ± 2.17 | 8.23 ± 2.05 | 7.64 ± 1.87 | 6.64 ± 1.67∗#& | 4.451 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.045 | −2.481 | −4.120 | −4.698 | |||
|
| 0.964 | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 2The trend of IL-2 changes.
The trend of IL-13 changes.
| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 36.66 ± 3.19 | 30.22 ± 2.74 | 24.42 ± 2.53∗# | 20.16 ± 2.15∗#& | 7.723 | <0.001 |
| Conventional group | 49 | 36.63 ± 3.25 | 32.74 ± 2.86 | 29.35 ± 2.78∗# | 26.63 ± 2.32∗#& | 5.624 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.046 | −4.454 | −9.181 | −14.318 | |||
|
| 0.963 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 3The trend of IL-13 changes.
The changing trend of the vaginal pH value.
| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 6.93 ± 0.63 | 5.63 ± 0.53 | 4.57 ± 0.43∗# | 3.82 ± 0.27∗#& | 5.532 | <0.001 |
| Conventional group | 49 | 6.91 ± 0.61 | 6.03 ± 0.56 | 5.34 ± 0.53∗# | 4.93 ± 0.31∗#& | 3.326 | 0.034 |
|
| 0.160 | −3.631 | −7.897 | −18.901 | |||
|
| 0.873 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 4Vaginal pH changes.
The changing trend of vaginal cleanliness.
| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 2.73 ± 0.56 | 2.12 ± 0.42 | 1.78 ± 0.33∗# | 1.21 ± 0.29∗#& | 4.426 | <0.001 |
| Conventional group | 49 | 2.72 ± 0.58 | 2.33 ± 0.48 | 2.04 ± 0.42∗# | 1.98 ± 0.32∗# | 3.325 | 0.028 |
|
| 0.087 | −2.305 | −3.407 | −12.481 | |||
|
| 0.931 | 0.023 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 5Vaginal cleanliness changes.
Adverse reaction comparison.
| Group |
| Nausea and vomiting | Bad breath | Diarrhea | Rash | Occurrence rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 49 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 (22.45%) |
| Conventional group | 49 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 (16.33%) |
|
| 0.588 | |||||
|
| 0.443 |
Figure 6Comparison of recurrence rates.