Weiguang Yu1, Xing Li1, Hongbo Zhou2, Yang Zhang3, Zhiguo Sun1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang, China. 2. Internal Medicine Oncology, Affiliated Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang, China. 3. Department of Anatomy, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang, China.
Abstract
This study was aimed to analyze the application value of the filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithm of computed tomography (CT) images in laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. In this study, 56 patients with gastric cancer were selected as research subjects and randomly divided into the control group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy) and the observation group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with the FBP reconstruction algorithm), with 28 patients in each group. Fourier transform and iterative reconstruction were introduced for comparison, and finally, the postoperative curative effect and adverse events were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the CT image quality score processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm (4.31 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than that of the iterative reconstruction method (3.5 ± 0.29) and the Fourier transform method (3.97 ± 0.38) (P < 0.05). The incidences of postoperative wound infection and gastric motility disorder (5.88% and 8.16%, respectively) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (8.21% and 10.82%, respectively) (P < 0.05). The levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) (280.35 ± 15.08 ng/L) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (144.32 ± 10.32 ng/L) in the observation group after the treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were 399.71 ± 14.19 ng/L and 165.33 ± 10.08 ng/L, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the FBP reconstruction algorithm was better than other algorithms in the processing of gastric cancer CT images. The FBP reconstruction algorithm showed a good reconstruction effect on CT images of gastric cancer; CT images based on this algorithm helped to formulate targeted surgical treatment plans for gastric cancer, showing a high clinical application value.
This study was aimed to analyze the application value of the filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithm of computed tomography (CT) images in laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. In this study, 56 patients with gastric cancer were selected as research subjects and randomly divided into the control group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy) and the observation group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with the FBP reconstruction algorithm), with 28 patients in each group. Fourier transform and iterative reconstruction were introduced for comparison, and finally, the postoperative curative effect and adverse events were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the CT image quality score processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm (4.31 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than that of the iterative reconstruction method (3.5 ± 0.29) and the Fourier transform method (3.97 ± 0.38) (P < 0.05). The incidences of postoperative wound infection and gastric motility disorder (5.88% and 8.16%, respectively) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (8.21% and 10.82%, respectively) (P < 0.05). The levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) (280.35 ± 15.08 ng/L) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (144.32 ± 10.32 ng/L) in the observation group after the treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were 399.71 ± 14.19 ng/L and 165.33 ± 10.08 ng/L, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the FBP reconstruction algorithm was better than other algorithms in the processing of gastric cancer CT images. The FBP reconstruction algorithm showed a good reconstruction effect on CT images of gastric cancer; CT images based on this algorithm helped to formulate targeted surgical treatment plans for gastric cancer, showing a high clinical application value.
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, which has a serious
impact on human health and even life. The 5-year survival rate of such malignant tumors is
generally low; however, if it can be detected early and treated aggressively, the 5-year
survival rate can reach more than 90%. Therefore, early detection, early diagnosis, and
early treatment of this type of malignant tumor are very important [1, 2]. According to 2018 global
survey data, the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer ranked fifth and second in
malignant tumors, respectively, and showed an increasing trend with age [3, 4]. Early gastric
cancer may not show obvious clinical symptoms. When the patient develops symptoms such as
abdominal pain or discomfort, anemia, indigestion, dysphagia or obstruction, and other
symptoms, it has mostly become advanced gastric cancer [5, 6]. At present, gastric cancer is mainly
treated by surgery, and radiotherapy and chemotherapy are performed before and after surgery
to enhance the curative effect [7]. Radical surgery is
the main treatment for early gastric cancer; palliative surgery can be used when the tumor
cannot be completely removed in advanced gastric cancer [8, 9]. The resection rate of early gastric
cancer is high, up to 90%. Once in the advanced stage, the progression is rapid, and
the complete resection rate is extremely low [10,
11]. In addition, doctors need to formulate
corresponding treatment plans according to their special circumstances and choose the most
suitable therapy for patients with different tumor stages, tumor types, and physical
conditions [12, 13].With the continuous advancement of modern medical diagnosis technology, various types of
medical equipment are also highly popularized, and various auxiliary inspection methods can
be used in the medical field to take images, assist clinicians to determine the lesions of
gastric cancer, and determine surgical planning [14,
15]. Among them, computed tomography (CT) imaging
is an important means of gastric cancer detection, with high diagnostic accuracy and good
adaptability. However, the current segmentation of conventional CT images has great
limitations and challenges, and there are problems such as blurred lesion boundaries and
insignificant differences in brightness [16, 17]. Image reconstruction technology plays an important
role in many fields. Common CT image reconstruction algorithms include the Fourier transform
method, the iterative reconstruction method, and the filtered back-projection (FBP) method.
In the process of research and implementation of the FBP algorithm, there are a series of
extremely complex image processing problems and mathematical calculation problems, which
have the advantages of fast reconstruction speed and high image quality [18].At present, algorithms such as image reconstruction and computer-aided medical image
analysis have obvious advantages in major breakthrough in technology and the improvement of
medical level and have also become an effective way to solve problems in the medical image.
Therefore, to solve blurred edges and insignificant differences in brightness of traditional
CT images, a FBP reconstruction algorithm was introduced for image processing, and applied
in laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy to analyze its clinical application value.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Objects and Their Grouping
In this study, 56 patients with gastric cancer, admitted to the hospital from October
2019 to October 2020, were selected as research subjects, including 26 male patients and
30 female patients, aged 48–65 years old. Patients were randomly divided into a
control group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy) and an observation group
(64-slice spiral CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with the FBP reconstruction
algorithm), with 28 patients in each group. The average age of patients in the control
group was 53.21 ± 7.28 years old, and the average age of patients in
the experimental group was 54.08 ± 6.87 years old. This study had been
approved by the ethics committee of hospital, and these patients and their families
understood the research content and signed the informed consent.Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent
laparoscopic-guided radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer without restriction of
pathological type; patients with complete case data; and patients with no radiotherapy or
chemotherapy before surgery.Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with liver and kidney dysfunction or other
system and organ diseases; patients with abnormal coagulation function and blood routine;
and patients with other types of gastric diseases such as gastritis and gastric ulcer.
2.2. CT Scanning
Patients were scanned with 64-slice spiral CT. Patients were required to fast for 5 hours
before the CT scan, but could drink a small amount of water for half an hour before the
scan. Patients were in the supine position, and the scanning range was from the top of the
diaphragm to the lower poles of both kidneys. Scanning parameters were defined as follows:
tube voltage was 120 kV, tube current was 120 mAs, gantry rotation time was
0.6 seconds, detector collimation parameter was 65 × 0.618 mm,
field of view was 340 mm × 340 mm, and matrix was
521 × 521.The obtained CT-enhanced images were sent to the workstation for processing. All patients
underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans of the abdomen. CT images were interpreted by two
attending doctors or radiologists with rich clinical experience. If there was any dispute
between two doctors or radiologists, they can consult with the third doctor or
radiologist.
2.3. Reconstruction of CT Images
The basis of CT image reconstruction was that the same X-ray intensity, passing through
different substances, has different attenuations. Using this law, different substances in
the human body can be distinguished.The process of CT image reconstruction was described as follows. In simple terms,
structures within each layer of the human body that were penetrated by X-rays in a CT scan
can be divided into small cubes (called voxels: Voxel). Each small cube
corresponded to a separate attenuation signal, which was input into the corresponding
small grid (called pixel: Pixel) in the image plane matrix, and the
attenuation signal of each voxel was input into the corresponding pixel. Then, it was
reflected in different grayscale images, so as to realize the reconstruction of CT images.
Figure 1 shows the flow of FBP reconstruction of
CT images.
Figure 1
The flow of FBP reconstruction of CT images.
The central slice theorem of a two-dimensional image stated that the Fourier transform
method p(ϖ) of the projection and
p(s) of a two-dimensional function
f(x, y) was equal to the slice of the
function f(x, y) that passed through
the origin in a direction parallel to the detector of the Fourier transform method
F(ϖx, ϖy).The one-dimensional continuous Fourier transform method pair isThe two-dimensional continuous Fourier transform method and the corresponding Fourier
transform are given as follows:The inverse transform is as follows:In the above equation, f is a two-dimensional function;
(μ, ν) represents the two-dimensional
Fourier transform of the function; and the Fourier transform of projection of each angle
was a straight line passing through the center of the frequency domain coordinates and
finally formed a point scattering shape. The density of original points of the central
segment in the plane ϖx − ϖy was
higher than that in the region farther from the origin, while the region near the origin
of Fourier space was the low frequency region. Excessive weighting of low frequency
components caused the image to become blurred. In order to eliminate the blurring effect,
it should weight the Fourier space to make the density uniform. Therefore, a low frequency
filter |w| was used to suppress low frequency components and
improve the clarity of the image.The basic starting point of the R-L filter function was that the actual two-dimensional
image function always had an upper frequency limit, so the filter function
|θ| in frequency can be expressed asIts filter function is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
R-L filter function.
Then, the continuous R-L convolution function is expressed inThe discretized R-L convolution function is shown inDifferent from the R-L filter function, the S-L filter function does not use a
rectangular function to intercept the |θ| filter function
in the frequency domain but uses some smoother window functions to constrain the filter
function. The window function W(θ) is assumed as
follows:Therefore, it could obtain that the S-L function could be expressed as
follows:The convolution function corresponding to the S-L filter function is expressed as
follows:Its discretized convolution function is given as follows:
2.4. Evaluation Indicators
All patients included underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans before
laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. CT images of patients in the observation group
underwent FBP reconstruction, and the reconstruction effect was analyzed by comparing the
image quality scores.Image quality was rated as follows: (1) the image quality was very poor, with blurred
edges and large noise in structures such as the chest wall; (2) the image quality was
poor, some artifacts were visible, and the diagnostic requirements cannot be met; (3) the
image quality was general with low recognition; (4) the image quality was good with sharp
edges; (5) the image quality was good with high recognition, and it can be used for
diagnosis.The incidence of adverse events and inflammatory response indexes of the two groups of
patients were compared after surgery: serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis
factor-α (TNF-α). Detection was completed
according to the operation instructions of the IL-6 detection kit and the
TNF-α detection kit, respectively.
2.5. Statistical Methods
SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for data processing in this study. Measurement
data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation
(x ± s), and enumeration
data were expressed as percentage (%). Pairwise comparisons were made using analysis
of variance. The difference was statistically significant at P <
0.05.
3. Results
3.1. CT Manifestations of Gastric Cancer
Figure 3 shows CT images of 4 gastric cancer
patients, including 2 male patients and 2 female patients, aged 52, 50, 50, and
54 years old, respectively. According to CT images of the four patients, the
gastric wall of these patients was irregular or diffusely thickened, and the gastric
cavity was deformed and narrowed. In addition, submucosal infiltration, thickening and
sclerosis of the gastric wall, thick mucosal folds, and thinning or thickening of local
blood vessels can be seen, and perigastric fat space appeared as a cord image.
Figure 3
CT findings of four gastric cancer patients. The red marked area in the figure indicates
irregular or diffuse thickening.
3.2. The Reconstruction Effect of the CT Image Algorithm
To solve the noise and unclear image edges in conventional CT images under the premise of
ensuring image quality, the initial image was reconstructed by introducing the Fourier
transform method, the iterative reconstruction method, and the FBP reconstruction
algorithm to compare the processing effects of different reconstruction algorithms on the
image. The results are shown in Figure 4. CT
reconstruction of different tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages of lung cancer suggested
that CT images processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm showed higher definition,
clear edges, and no obvious noise.
Figure 4
Processing effects of different algorithms. T3 and T4 represent different TNM stages. The
red marked area in the figure indicates irregular or diffuse thickening.
3.3. Evaluation of Reconstruction Effect
Figure 5 shows the comparison results of CT images
processed by the Fourier transform method, the iterative reconstruction method, and the
FBP reconstruction algorithm, respectively. Figure
5(a) shows the comparison of CT values of three algorithms with different tube
currents. There was no statistically significant difference in CT values of three
algorithms with different tube currents (P > 0.05), and there was no
significant difference in CT values of three algorithms for the same tube current
(P > 0.05). Figures 5(a)
and 5(b) illustrate that the CT image quality score
processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm (4.31 ± 0.31) was
significantly higher than that of the iterative reconstruction method
(3.5 ± 0.29) and the Fourier transform method
(3.97 ± 0.38) (P < 0.05). In addition, the CT
image noise processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm (5.28 ± 0.63)
was significantly lower than that of the iterative reconstruction method
(7.25 ± 0.59) and the Fourier transform method
(18.97 ± 0.54) (P < 0.05).
Figure 5
Evaluation of CT image reconstruction effect. (a) CT value. (b) Comparison of the image
quality score. (c) Comparison of the image noise. ∗ meant
significant difference compared with the Fourier transform method (P
< 0.05) and # meant significant difference compared to the iterative
reconstruction method (P < 0.05).
3.4. Postoperative Adverse Events in Patients
After two groups of patients were treated by laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy
under the guidance of different CT images, the results of postoperative adverse events
were compared. As illustrated in Figure 6, the more
common postoperative adverse events included wound infection, abdominal pain, nausea and
vomiting, gastric motility disorder, and pulmonary disorders. The incidences of gastric
motility disorder and wound infection were higher. The incidence of postoperative wound
infection (8.21% vs. 10.82%) and gastric motility disorder (5.88% vs.
8.16%) in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control
group (P < 0.05).
Figure 6
The incidence of postoperative adverse events in patients. (a–g) Postoperative
wound infection, pulmonary infection, abdominal infection, severe abdominal pain, nausea
and vomiting, gastric motility disorder, and other complications, respectively.
∗ indicates the difference was significant compared with the
control group (P < 0.05).
3.5. Changes of Postoperative Inflammatory Response Indicators in Patients
Figure 7 shows the comparison of changes in the
inflammatory response indexes IL-6 and TNF-α before and after the
treatment in the control group and the observation group. It demonstrates that there was
no significant difference in the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α between
the two groups before the treatment (P > 0.05). The serum levels of
IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation group after the treatment
(280.35 ± 15.08 ng/L,
144.32 ± 10.32 ng/L) were significantly lower than those in the
control group (399.71 ± 14.19 ng/L,
165.33 ± 10.08 ng/L) (P < 0.05).
Figure 7
Comparison of inflammatory response indicators in patients: (a) comparison of the changes
of IL-6 and (b) comparison of the changes of TNF-α.
∗ indicates a significant difference compared with the control
group (P < 0.05).
4. Discussion
Gastric cancer can be divided into early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer. Its CT
has various manifestations, such as early gastric cancer is difficult to detect on CT due to
its small lesions, and gastroscopic examination is required for diagnosis at this time
[19]. For advanced gastric cancer, the cancer has
invaded the submucosal layer and even entered the muscularis. On CT, main manifestations are
localized or diffuse gastric wall thickening, the gastric wall thickening is usually uneven,
and even ulcers can be seen, and the localized appearance of this cancer is rigid [20, 21]. CT can
not only show changes of the gastric wall itself but it can also show the tumor's
invasion to the surrounding, local or distant metastasis, such as the perigastric lymph node
enlargement, ascites, thickening of the omentum and mesentery, and implanted nodules,
showing a high application value in the diagnosis and the treatment of gastric cancer [22, 23]. Gastric
cancer is divided into four stages according to CT manifestations. Stage I: a mass confined
to the gastric cavity without metastasis or invasion to adjacent organs; stage II: the
thickening of the gastric wall greater than or equal to 1 cm; stage III: gastric
cancer that has invaded adjacent organs in addition to local manifestations; and stage IV:
distant metastasis. Therefore, gastric cancer can be diagnosed by staging based on CT
findings and then help clinicians to formulate corresponding treatment plans, so that
patients can receive the most suitable treatment [24,
25]. The filtered back-projection reconstruction
algorithm is developed on the basis of the back-projection method, and the image sharpness
is solved by adding a filter function.Tamura et al. [26] showed that the FBP
reconstruction algorithm has fast reconstruction speed and high image quality and has become
a commonly used CT image reconstruction method. CT images of gastric cancer patients were
processed by introducing the Fourier transform method, the iterative reconstruction method,
and the FBP reconstruction algorithm, respectively. The results showed that the CT image
quality score processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm was significantly higher than
that processed by the iterative reconstruction method and the Fourier transform method
(P < 0.05); and the CT image noise processed by the FBP
reconstruction algorithm was significantly lower than that by the iterative reconstruction
method and the Fourier transform method (P < 0.05). It is concluded
that the FBP algorithm not only effectively solves the problems of large noise and unclear
edges in conventional CT images but also its performance is significantly better than other
algorithms. The research of Padole et al. [27]
pointed out that although the iterative reconstruction algorithm was proposed earlier than
filtered back-projection, it depended on the breakthrough of computer performance due to its
huge computational load and slow reconstruction speed.CT images reconstructed by the FBP algorithm were used for laparoscopic-assisted distal
gastrectomy. The results showed that the incidence of postoperative surgical wound infection
and gastric motility disorder in the observation group was significantly lower than that in
the control group (P < 0.05). It may be because CT images
reconstructed by the FBP algorithm better show stratification of lesions invading the
gastric wall and make more accurate staging according to the degree of invasion, so as to
formulate targeted treatment plans for patients, reducing the occurrence of various
postoperative adverse events in patients [28, 29]. The levels of serum inflammatory response indexes
IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation group after the treatment were
significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
Similarly, reconstructed CT images helped doctors to better observe tumor metastasis in
combination with images, make accurate staging diagnosis, and carry out corresponding
treatment. Therefore, using it in laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric
cancer is of a high application value.
5. Conclusion
The results of this study found that the FBP reconstruction algorithm showed better
reconstruction effect on CT images of gastric cancer; CT images based on the algorithm were
helpful to formulate targeted surgical treatment plans for gastric cancer, showing a high
clinical application value. However, this study only performed CT scan diagnosis and image
reconstruction analysis for patients with advanced gastric cancer, and the sample sources
were concentrated and lacked representativeness. Therefore, in the follow-up research, it
would improve and optimize this aspect, and further analyze the reconstruction algorithm of
CT images and its application value in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors. In
conclusion, this study could provide a reference for the early diagnosis and treatment of
gastric cancer and other diseases.
Authors: Alexander B J Borgstein; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wytze Lameris; Wietse J Eshuis; Suzanne S Gisbertz Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Emma C Gertsen; Hylke J F Brenkman; Richard van Hillegersberg; Johanna W van Sandick; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Misha D P Luyer; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jan J B van Lanschot; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Wobbe O de Steur; Henk H Hartgrink; Jan H M B Stoot; Karel W E Hulsewe; Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen; Marc J van Det; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Donald L van der Peet; Freek Daams; Nicole C T van Grieken; Joos Heisterkamp; Boudewijn van Etten; Jan Willem van den Berg; Jean Pierre Pierie; Hasan H Eker; Annemieke Y Thijssen; Eric J T Belt; Peter van Duijvendijk; Eelco Wassenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Kevin P Wevers; Lieke Hol; Frank J Wessels; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Miriam P van der Meulen; Geert W J Frederix; Erik Vegt; Peter D Siersema; Jelle P Ruurda Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 14.766