| Literature DB >> 36016848 |
Zuoming Bai1, Jianguo Wang1, Mingming Kang1, Peng Guo1, Dong Wang1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effects of pamidronate disodium combined with calcium on BMD values and the severity of pain in elderly patients with osteoporosis based on the mobile terminal platform for the Internet of Things.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016848 PMCID: PMC9398865 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5069918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.464
Comparison of patients' general information.
| Groups | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.175 | 0.676 | ||
| Male | 34 | 28 | ||
| Female | 34 | 24 | ||
| Age (years) | 73.99 ± 3.16 | 74.44 ± 3.65 | 0.723 | 0.471 |
| Body mass (kg) | 62.65 ± 2.65 | 62.74 ± 2.40 | 0.192 | 0.848 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.11 ± 1.20 | 22.13 ± 1.24 | 0.089 | 0.929 |
| Course of disease (years) | 5.29 ± 1.94 | 4.98 ± 1.66 | 0.922 | 0.358 |
| Severity degree | 0.369 | 0.544 | ||
| Moderate grade | 48 | 34 | ||
| Severe grade | 20 | 18 | ||
| Education level | ||||
| Primary school | 30 | 26 | 0.410 | 0.522 |
| Senior high school | 28 | 20 | 0.091 | 0.764 |
| University and above | 10 | 6 | 0.256 | 0.613 |
| Income level (yuan) | 0.019 | 0.890 | ||
| ≥4000 | 41 | 32 | ||
| <4000 | 27 | 20 | ||
| Payment of medical expenses | ||||
| Medical insurance | 30 | 22 | 0.039 | 0.843 |
| Commercial insurance | 24 | 18 | 0.006 | 0.938 |
| Others | 14 | 12 | 0.108 | 0.743 |
| Place of residence | 0.016 | 0.901 | ||
| Town | 40 | 30 | ||
| Countryside | 28 | 22 |
Figure 1Comparison of patients' BMD values (−x ± s, g/cm2). Notes were as follows: Figure 1(a) shows the BMD value of L2. Figure 1(b) shows the BMD value of L3. Figure 1(c) shows the BMD value of L4. Figure 1(d) shows the BMD value of total hip. Figure 1(e) shows the BMD value of femur neck. There was no statistical difference in the BMD values of lumbar vertebrae L2-4, total hip, and femur neck between the experimental group and the control group before treatment (0.74 ± 0.05 vs. 0.75 ± 0.05, 0.75 ± 0.04 vs. 0.74 ± 0.04, 0.77 ± 0.05 vs. 0.78 ± 0.04, 0.62 ± 0.05 vs. 0.63 ± 0.05, 0.58 ± 0.04 vs. 0.59 ± 0.03, p > 0.05). The BMD values of lumbar vertebrae L2-4, total hip, and femur neck in the experimental group at 6 months after treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (0.84 ± 0.03 vs. 0.77 ± 0.04, 0.83 ± 0.04 vs. 0.78 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.04 vs. 0.84 ± 0.06, 0.69 ± 0.04 vs. 0.64 ± 0.03, 0.68 ± 0.03 vs. 0.62 ± 0.04, p < 0.001). The BMD values of lumbar vertebrae L2-4, total hip, and femur neck in the experimental group at 1 year after treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (0.95 ± 0.02 vs. 0.82 ± 0.03, 0.96 ± 0.05 vs. 0.81 ± 0.06, 1.04 ± 0.08 vs. 0.86 ± 0.04, 0.71 ± 0.03 vs. 0.65 ± 0.04, 0.70 ± 0.03 vs. 0.63 ± 0.04, p < 0.001).