| Literature DB >> 36016671 |
Yan Zhang1, Dongmei Guo1, Xiaocui Yang1, Xiaojing Sun1, Yajuan Dong1, Jun Zhang1, Yujiao Gao1, Zhanhua Guo1, Haikun Zhou1, Quanfu Li1.
Abstract
To analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention based on ERAS's concept in laparoscopic gallbladder polyp (GP) surgery on patients' postoperative quality of life and nursing job satisfaction. Ninety patients with polyps were included in this article until October 2021. In this format, the 45 cases are divided into governing bodies and committees according to their processing time. As recommended by the ERAS committee, the committee provides daily and patient care, as well as training on the WeChat platform. The pain level (visual analogue scale (VAS) score), the quality of life (life quality index (GLQI) score), and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. The VAS score of the control group at 2 h after operation was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the GLQI scores of the two groups were higher than those before the intervention, and the GLQI scores of the control group were higher than those of the control group, with significant differences (all P < 0.05). Studies have shown that comprehensive nursing intervention applied to patients with gallbladder polyps can reduce postoperative pain with less complications and can also improve nursing satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016671 PMCID: PMC9385345 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6919130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scanning ISSN: 0161-0457 Impact factor: 1.750
Figure 1ERAS concept map.
Comparison table of operation-related indicators between the two groups.
| Group | Time to get out of bed (h) | Anus exhausting time (h) | Length of stay (d) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group ( | 8.85 ± 1.61 | 15.32 ± 3.40 | 4.51 ± 0.88 |
| Control group ( | 12.24 ± 1.98 | 20.33 ± 4.14 | 6.21 ± 1.02 |
|
| 8.351 | 5.928 | 8.705 |
|
| <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of quality scores of the two groups before and after the intervention.
| Group | Physical function | Mental functioning | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the intervention | After the intervention | Before the intervention | After the intervention | |
| Observation group ( | 56.58 ± 6.99 | 78.24 ± 6.25 | 55.15 ± 5.95 | 8123 ± 6.78 |
| Control group ( | 56.43 ± 5.14 | 66.85 ± 7.21 | 54.98 ± 5.28 | 70.27 ± 6.98 |
|
| 0.026 | 7.182 | 0.028 | 8.147 |
|
| > 0.05 | <0.05 | >0.05 | <0.05 |
Comparison of GLQI scores between the two groups before and after intervention.
| Group | Number of cases | GLQI score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Postoperation | ||
| Control group | 45 | 81.65 ± 14.95 | 94.51 ± 17.95 |
| Observation group | 45 | 80.35 ± 15.24 | 108.26 ± 20.65 |
Nursing job satisfaction was compared between the two groups.
| Group | Number of cases | Great satisfaction | Satisfaction | Dissatisfaction | Nursing job satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 45 | 29 | 16 | 0 | 45 (100%) |
| Control group | 45 | 27 | 11 | 7 | 38 (84.44%) |
|
| 8.347 | ||||
|
| 0.004 |
Figure 2The line chart of nursing job satisfaction was compared between the two groups.