| Literature DB >> 36016577 |
Yangyang Zhang1, Li Yu2, Jiehong Yang1, Zhishan Ding3, Yu He4, Haitong Wan2.
Abstract
Yangyin Tongnao Granules (YYTNG), as traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) compound preparation, have a good curative effect on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the active components of YYTNG in the plasma and the inflammatory response in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury rats. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted to determine the fingerprints at different time points of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rats after the administration of YYTNG at different times points. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect the levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the plasma of MCAO rats at different time points. The spectral-effect relationship between the YYTNG fingerprints and inflammatory indexes in vivo was established by combining three different mathematical models, grey correlation, multiple linear regression, and partial least-square method. The results revealed that each chromatographic peak in the HPLC of the plasma exhibited a certain correlation with the inflammatory index, in the following order: P2 >P6 >P5 >P1 >P3 >P4. Therefore, this study successfully established the spectrum-effect correlation of YYTNG on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury rats. The results provide a certain guiding ideology for the analyses of the relationship between fingerprints and the pharmacodynamics of TCM prescriptions.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC fingerprint; cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury; mathematical model; spectrum-effect relationship; yangyin tongnao granules
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016577 PMCID: PMC9395610 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.947978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1HPLC chromatograms of YYTNG in MCAO rats. (A) Blank plasma; (B) Medicated plasma of 2 h after administration; (C) Fingerprints at different time points.
The peak areas in the rat plasma at different time points ( ±s, n = 6).
| 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 181.5 ± 57 | 184.1 ± 30.2 | 171.8 ± 18.2 | 172.1 ± 18.2 | 141.2 ± 20.4 | 183.8 ± 47.3 | 176 ± 22.4 | 159.9 ± 33 |
|
| 107.1 ± 23 | 82.1 ± 3.3 | 85.6 ± 9.5 | 59.4 ± 9.5 | 41.5 ± 2.5 | 48.8 ± 7.8 | 94.2 ± 3 | 53.7 ± 6.1 |
|
| 921.8 ± 293.4 | 1050.2 ± 173.2 | 907.6 ± 38.2 | 892.8 ± 38.2 | 949.5 ± 103.3 | 1266.5 ± 297.6 | 1158.8 ± 142 | 1003.1 ± 83.3 |
|
| 12.3 ± 1.4 | 11.6 ± 1.5 | 11.2 ± 0.9 | 28.4 ± 0.9 | 15.7 ± 4.6 | 21.1 ± 6.3 | 33.3 ± 13.5 | 45.7 ± 23 |
|
| 36 ± 5.4 | 40.1 ± 9.6 | 33.5 ± 5.5 | 86.9 ± 5.5 | 66.7 ± 0.1 | 28.6 ± 24 | 57.1 ± 36.7 | 72.6 ± 49.4 |
|
| 27.7 ± 7.4 | 31 ± 1.6 | 31.3 ± 1.6 | 18.7 ± 1.6 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 16.3 ± 3.7 | 15.4 ± 1.4 | 13.6 ± 1.1 |
FIGURE 2Effect of YYTNG on the inflammatory factors at different time points in MCAO rats ( ±s, n = 6)
Peak areas and pharmacodynamic comprehensive evaluation value at different time points ( ±s, n = 6).
| 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | 8 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 181.5 | 184.1 | 171.8 | 172.1 | 141.2 | 183.8 | 176 | 159.9 |
|
| 107.1 | 82.1 | 85.6 | 59.4 | 41.5 | 48.8 | 94.2 | 53.7 |
|
| 921.8 | 1050.2 | 907.6 | 892.8 | 949.5 | 1266.5 | 1158.8 | 1003.1 |
|
| 12.3 | 11.6 | 11.2 | 28.4 | 15.7 | 21.1 | 33.3 | 45.7 |
|
| 36.0 | 40.1 | 33.5 | 86.9 | 66.7 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 72.6 |
|
| 27.7 | 31 | 31.3 | 18.7 | 12.2 | 16.3 | 15.4 | 13.6 |
|
| 197.3 | 175.2 | 166.6 | 155.9 | 163.7 | 169.5 | 176.7 | 173.9 |
Gray correlation value between the ingredients and the comprehensive evaluation value of efficacy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.921 | 0.825 | 0.931 | 0.743 | 0.720 | 0.788 |
The predicted value, actual value, and D-value of pharmacodynamic comprehensive evaluation value (Y).
|
|
| Difference1 |
| Difference2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 197.252 | 184.314 | 12.938 | 182.135 | 15.117 |
| 175.222 | 176.053 | 4.931 | 177.225 | 6.356 |
| 166.639 | 176.720 | 10.081 | 176.683 | 10.044 |
| 155.926 | 167.122 | 11.196 | 170.749 | 14.823 |
| 163.653 | 159.542 | 8.839 | 162.883 | 7.880 |
| 169.499 | 167.385 | 5.137 | 167.613 | 4.416 |
| 176.693 | 178.419 | 8.342 | 173.402 | 10.756 |
| 173.881 | 169.208 | 13.555 | 168.073 | 12.628 |
Note: predicted value 1 was calculated by using a multiple linear regression model. The predicted value 2 was calculated by using a partial least squares regression model.
The correlation coefficients between the individual chromatographic peak area and between the peak area and the comprehensive evaluation value of pharmacodynamics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.000 | 0.345 | 0.504 | −0.078 | −0.341 | 0.239 | 0.221 |
|
| 0.345 | 1.000 | −0.187 | −0.229 | −0.375 | 0.636 | 0.556 |
|
| 0.504 | −0.187 | 1.000 | 0.005 | −0.280 | −0.208 | −0.055 |
|
| −0.078 | −0.229 | 0.005 | 1.000 | 0.637 | −0.495 | 0.010 |
|
| −0.341 | −0.375 | −0.280 | 0.637 | 1.000 | −0.659 | −0.276 |
|
| 0.239 | 0.636 | −0.208 | −0.495 | −0.659 | 1.000 | 0.410 |
|
| 0.221 | 0.556 | −0.055 | 0.010 | −0.276 | 0.410 | 1.000 |
Y represents the correlation coefficient between the peak area and the comprehensive evaluation value of pharmacodynamics.