| Literature DB >> 36016555 |
Huang Liu1,2, Zhongwang Huang3, Houbin Zheng2, Zhiyong Zhu2, Hui Yang4, Xingzhang Liu2, Tao Pang2, Liping He5, Hai Lin2, Lei Hu2, Qingqi Zeng1,6, Lanying Han7.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the evidence of JWRJD in the treatment of cryptozoospermia.Entities:
Keywords: JWRJD; cryptozoospermia; network pharmacology; testicular microenvironment; varicocele
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016555 PMCID: PMC9395676 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.945949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Ultrasonic testing standard.
| Grade of varicocele | Palpation | Width (mm) | Reflux(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | − | ≤1.7 | 0 |
| Grade 0 | − | 1.8–2.1 | 1–2 |
| Grade I | + | 2.2–2.7 | 2–4 |
| Grade II | + | 2.8–3.1 | 4–6 |
| Grade III | + | ≥3.1 | ≥6 |
FIGURE 1Follow-up flowchart of all the patients.
Baseline data on the three groups before the treatment.
| Indicator | Group A | Group B | Group C | F |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size ( | 58 | 55 | 49 | — | — |
| Age ( | 33.41 ± 4.47 | 34.2 ± 5.92 | 35.27 ± 6.10 | 1.504 | 0.225 |
| Height (cm) | 169.50 ± 2.97 | 169.36 ± 3.58 | 168.90 ± 3.18 | 0.489 | 0.614 |
| Weight (kg) | 70.78 ± 3.17 | 70.26 ± 2.71 | 71.01 ± 3.12 | 0.858 | 0.426 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.66 ± 1.39 | 24.51 ± 1.09 | 24.90 ± 1.15 | 1.350 | 0.262 |
| Left testicular size (ml) | 13.52 ± 2.08 | 12.95 ± 2.84 | 12.76 ± 2.72 | 1.322 | 0.270 |
| Right testicular size (ml) | 14.02 ± 1.59 | 13.53 ± 1.99 | 13.43 ± 1.88 | 1.649 | 0.195 |
| Varicocele width (mm) | 2.57 ± 0.55 | 2.68 ± 0.61 | 2.74 ± 0.62 | 1.086 | 0.34 |
| Abstinence days ( | 4.53 ± 1.60 | 4.65 ± 1.72 | 4.39 ± 1.59 | 0.320 | 0.727 |
| Semen volume (ml) | 3.51 ± 1.59 | 3.53 ± 1.86 | 3.46 ± 1.81 | 0.025 | 0.975 |
| pH value | 7.99 ± 0.29 | 8.03 ± 0.35 | 8.03 ± 0.33 | 0.267 | 0.766 |
| Total sperm count ( | 21.36 ± 12.99 | 23.16 ± 17.06 | 22.13 ± 16.20 | 0.189 | 0.828 |
| Follicular estrogen (mIU/ml) | 14.70 ± 6.60 | 15.45 ± 5.94 | 14.21 ± 10.93 | 0.324 | 0.724 |
| Luteinizing hormone (mIU/ml) | 8.56 ± 3.21 | 10.22 ± 4.85 | 8.79 ± 6.29 | 1.877 | 0.156 |
| Prolactin (mIU/ml) | 297.19 ± 169.00 | 310.18 ± 156.46 | 244.15 ± 140.15 | 2.557 | 0.081 |
| Estradiol (pmol/L) | 107.67 ± 49.04 | 119.04 ± 56.13 | 105.36 ± 40.32 | 1.187 | 0.308 |
| Testosterone (nmol/L) | 16.18 ± 8.53 | 14.37 ± 7.93 | 12.75 ± 4.72 | 2.899 | 0.058 |
| Neutral α-glucosidase (U/L) | 36.11 ± 13.47 | 40.01 ± 23.36 | 34.42 ± 16.97 | 1.287 | 0.279 |
| Citric acid (mmol/L) | 37.53 ± 31.11 | 44.46 ± 32.40 | 40.47 ± 50.24 | 0.465 | 0.629 |
| Zinc (mmol/L) | 4.77 ± 2.91 | 4.97 ± 3.38 | 5.02 ± 5.36 | 0.060 | 0.942 |
FIGURE 2Comparison of related indicators of the three groups after treatment: red: Jiawei Runjing Decoction group (JWRJD group: group A), green: tamoxifen group (group B), and blue: no treatment group (control group: group C). (A) pH value. (B) Total sperm count. (C) Follicle stimulating hormone. (D) Testosterone. (E) Prolactin. (F) Luteinizing hormone. (G) Seminal plasma zinc. (H) Neutral α-glycosidase. (I) Seminal citric acid. (J) Vein width. (K) Left testicular volume. (L) Right testicular volume.
Baseline data on different age stages in group A before the treatment.
| Indicator | >35-year-old | ≤35-year-old |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | 14 | 43 | — | — |
| Height (cm) | 170.57 ± 3.06 | 169.14 ± 2.92 | 1.574 | 0.121 |
| Weight (kg) | 69.57 ± 2.45 | 71.02 ± 3.19 | −1.557 | 0.125 |
| Varicocele width (mm) | 2.75 ± 0.69 | 2.51 ± 0.49 | 1.454 | 0.152 |
| Left testicular size (ml) | 13.29 ± 2.30 | 13.67 ± 1.97 | 0.615 | 0.541 |
| Right testicular size (ml) | 13.79 ± 1.76 | 14.14 ± 1.54 | 0.722 | 0.473 |
| Abstinence days ( | 3.93 ± 1.21 | 4.77 ± 1.67 | −1.730 | 0.089 |
| Semen volume (ml) | 3.32 ± 1.57 | 3.58 ± 1.63 | −0.518 | 0.607 |
| pH value | 8.06 ± 0.24 | 7.98 ± 0.29 | 0.872 | 0.387 |
| Total sperm count ( | 21.00 ± 15.00 | 21.49 ± 12.46 | 0.121 | 0.904 |
| Follicular estrogen (mIU/ml) | 13.97 ± 4.12 | 14.88 ± 7.30 | −0.442 | 0.660 |
| Luteinizing hormone (mIU/ml) | 8.60 ± 3.52 | 8.58 ± 3.17 | 0.023 | 0.982 |
| Prolactin (mIU/ml) | 295.98 ± 173.63 | 298.07 ± 171.51 | −0.039 | 0.969 |
| Estradiol (pmol/L) | 110.26 ± 51.49 | 107.76 ± 49.02 | 0.164 | 0.870 |
| Testosterone (nmol/L) | 15.83 ± 6.80 | 16.07 ± 9.06 | −0.090 | 0.929 |
| Neutral α-glucosidase (U/L) | 42.50 ± 14.92 | 34.32 ± 12.52 | 2.026 | 0.050 |
| Citric acid (mmol/L) | 39.66 ± 28.46 | 37.30 ± 32.43 | 0.243 | 0.809 |
| Zinc (mmol/L) | 5.72 ± 3.64 | 4.56 ± 2.58 | 1.315 | 0.194 |
FIGURE 3Effect of JWRJD on men of different ages. (A): Sperm incremental (ΔSC): p < 0.05. (B): Testicular volume incremental (ΔTV): p < 0.05. (C): Vein width incremental (ΔVW): p < 0.05. (D): Incremental FSH (ΔFSH) and neutral α-glucosidase (ΔNeu): p < 0.05.
Indicator of different locations in group A before and after the treatment.
| Indicator | Before the treatment | After the treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left side | Both sides |
|
| Left side | Both sides |
|
| |
| Sample size ( | 51 | 6 | — | — | 51 | 6 | — | — |
| Abstinence days ( | 4.61 ± 1.61 | 4.17 ± 1.60 | 0.634 | 0.529 | 4.47 ± 1.43 | 5.00 ± 1.79 | −0.835 | 0.407 |
| Semen volume (ml) | 3.49 ± 1.60 | 3.70 ± 1.79 | −0.294 | 0.770 | 3.29 ± 1.62 | 2.30 ± 0.71 | 1.472 | 0.147 |
| pH value | 8.01 ± 0.28 | 7.92 ± 0.29 | 0.764 | 0.448 | 8.04 ± 0.32 | 7.90 ± 0.19 | 1.131 | 0.263 |
| Total sperm count ( | 20.51 ± 12.45 | 28.67 ± 16.38 | −1.470 | 0.147 | 48.35 ± 34.28 | 60.33 ± 45.74 | −0.782 | 0.437 |
| Follicular estrogen (mIU/ml) | 14.59 ± 6.77 | 15.24 ± 6.01 | −0.225 | 0.823 | 13.61 ± 8.03 | 9.78 ± 5.32 | 1.133 | 0.262 |
| Luteinizing hormone (mIU/ml) | 8.36 ± 3.18 | 10.50 ± 3.23 | −1.555 | 0.126 | 8.66 ± 3.65 | 7.38 ± 2.65 | 0.832 | 0.409 |
| Prolactin (mIU/ml) | 297.92 ± 176.67 | 294.43 ± 115.54 | 0.047 | 0.963 | 279.94 ± 155.43 | 282.88 ± 96.77 | −0.045 | 0.964 |
| Estradiol (pmol/L) | 104.11 ± 45.65 | 144.58 ± 67.03 | −1.954 | 0.056 | 104.06 ± 53.57 | 136.57 ± 82.85 | −1.325 | 0.191 |
| Testosterone (nmol/L) | 15.89 ± 8.58 | 17.04 ± 8.53 | −0.310 | 0.758 | 17.30 ± 9.43 | 19.94 ± 10.71 | −0.641 | 0.524 |
| Neutral α-glucosidase (U/L) | 35.35 ± 13.24 | 44.65 ± 13.83 | −1.621 | 0.111 | 66.75 ± 17.82 | 57.96 ± 27.32 | 1.078 | 0.286 |
| Citric acid (mmol/L) | 38.71 ± 32.88 | 30.84 ± 8.41 | 0.580 | 0.565 | 60.06 ± 19.53 | 52.82 ± 17.65 | 0.866 | 0.390 |
| Zinc (mmol/L) | 4.60 ± 2.73 | 6.91 ± 3.62 | −1.900 | 0.063 | 7.98 ± 5.55 | 5.37 ± 4.01 | 1.113 | 0.271 |
FIGURE 4Changes of FSH (ΔFSH) before and after treatment.
Indicator of different grades in group A before the treatment.
| Indicator | Grade 0 | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | F |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size ( | 15 | 19 | 10 | 13 | — | — |
| Age ( | 33.73 ± 5.61 | 32.95 ± 4.36 | 34.00 ± 2.94 | 33.92 ± 4.03 | 0.188 | 0.904 |
| Height (cm) | 168.87 ± 3.36 | 170.00 ± 2.43 | 169.40 ± 2.41 | 169.51 ± 3.82 | 0.391 | 0.760 |
| Weight (kg) | 72.10 ± 2.92 | 70.45 ± 3.16 | 69.25 ± 3.11 | 70.42 ± 2.72 | 1.957 | 0.132 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.30 ± 1.26 | 24.40 ± 1.49 | 24.15 ± 1.29 | 24.52 ± 1.22 | 1.919 | 0.138 |
| Abstinence days ( | 4.33 ± 1.45 | 4.42 ± 1.61 | 5.40 ± 1.78 | 4.38 ± 1.61 | 1.121 | 0.349 |
| Semen volume (ml) | 4.07 ± 1.85 | 3.23 ± 1.44 | 4.09 ± 1.38 | 2.86 ± 1.51 | 2.046 | 0.119 |
| pH value | 7.99 ± 0.30 | 8.02 ± 0.26 | 7.97 ± 0.37 | 8.00 ± 0.23 | 0.072 | 0.975 |
| Total sperm count ( | 19.80 ± 10.60 | 18.74 ± 12.65 | 22.70 ± 14.45 | 26.00 ± 14.86 | 0.915 | 0.440 |
| Follicular estrogen (mIU/ml) | 14.75 ± 6.29 | 12.81 ± 7.38 | 14.25 ± 7.64 | 17.58 ± 4.44 | 1.371 | 0.262 |
| Luteinizing hormone (mIU/ml) | 8.14 ± 3.16 | 8.59 ± 2.39 | 7.79 ± 4.70 | 9.71 ± 3.11 | 0.817 | 0.490 |
| Prolactin (mIU/ml) | 247.09 ± 185.78 | 331.47 ± 191.44 | 287.16 ± 126.06 | 314.21 ± 151.89 | 0.723 | 0.538 |
| Estradiol (pmol/L) | 100.44 ± 34.11 | 104.65 ± 53.16 | 98.77 ± 34.17 | 130.36 ± 64.15 | 1.170 | 0.330 |
| Testosterone (nmol/L) | 17.43 ± 7.57 | 14.93 ± 9.93 | 14.18 ± 8.69 | 17.36 ± 7.55 | 0.493 | 0.689 |
| Neutral α-glucosidase (U/L) | 34.39 ± 12.70 | 36.57 ± 13.78 | 45.30 ± 16.31 | 31.32 ± 8.81 | 2.334 | 0.084 |
| Citric acid (mmol/L) | 47.12 ± 25.39 | 41.52 ± 38.15 | 43.47 ± 33.48 | 17.60 ± 13.72 | 2.671 | 0.057 |
| Zinc (mmol/L) | 5.98 ± 2.96 | 4.43 ± 2.15 | 5.35 ± 3.39 | 3.73 ± 3.12 | 1.707 | 0.177 |
FIGURE 5Effect of JWRJD on men with different varicocele grades. (A) Left testicular volume before treatment. (B) Right testicular volume before treatment. (C) Mean varicocele vein width before treatment. (D) Left testicular volume after treatment. (E) Right testicular volume after treatment. (F) citric acid after treatment. (G) mean varicocele vein width after treatment. (H) incremental FSH after treatment. (I) incremental left vein width after treatment.
FIGURE 6Factors affecting the therapeutic effect of JWRJD. (A) Correlation between sperm count after treatment and other indicators. (B) Relationship between total sperm count increment and other indicators. (C) Relationship between SC and ΔCC. (D) Relationship between SC and ΔM-VW. (E) Relationship between SC and ΔL-VW. (F) Relationship between SC and ΔL-TV. (G) Relationship between SC and CC. (H) Relationship between SC and bSC. (I) Relationship between SC and ΔR-TV.
Regression analysis of related indicators.
| Dependent index | Equation | R2 | F | df1 | df2 | Sig | Constant | b1 | b2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔCC | Linear | 0.118 | 7.375 | 1 | 55 | 0.009 | 3.059 | 0.352 | |
| ΔM-VW | Linear | 0.233 | 16.667 | 1 | 55 | 0 | 0.075 | −0.003 | |
| ΔR-TV | Linear | 0.006 | 0.356 | 1 | 55 | 0.553 | 0.14 | 0.003 | |
| ΔL-TV | Linear | 0.101 | 6.161 | 1 | 55 | 0.016 | −0.683 | 0.015 | |
| CC | Linear | 0.096 | 5.835 | 1 | 55 | 0.019 | 51.556 | −0.273 | |
| bSC | Linear | 0.086 | 5.154 | 1 | 55 | 0.027 | 16.033 | 0.108 | |
| ΔCC | Logarithmic | 0.142 | 9.104 | 1 | 55 | 0.004 | −46.094 | 18.253 | |
| ΔM-VW | Logarithmic | 0.209 | 14.549 | 1 | 55 | 0 | 0.372 | −0.117 | |
| ΔR-TV | Logarithmic | 0 | 0.011 | 1 | 55 | 0.919 | 0.393 | −0.026 | |
| ΔL-TV | Logarithmic | 0.108 | 6.655 | 1 | 55 | 0.013 | −2.6 | 0.727 | |
| CC | Logarithmic | 0.124 | 7.795 | 1 | 55 | 0.007 | 91.668 | −14.705 | |
| bSC | Logarithmic | 0.05 | 2.876 | 1 | 55 | 0.096 | 7.22 | 3.877 | |
| ΔCC | Secondary | 0.139 | 4.370 | 2 | 54 | 0.017 | −6.664 | 0.762 | −0.003 |
| ΔM-VW | Secondary | 0.243 | 8.688 | 2 | 54 | 0.001 | 0.038 | −0.001 | −1.09E-05 |
| ΔR-TV | Secondary | 0.043 | 1.2 | 2 | 54 | 0.309 | 0.634 | −0.018 | 0 |
| ΔL-TV | Secondary | 0.101 | 3.03 | 2 | 54 | 0.057 | -0.643 | 0.013 | 1.18E-05 |
| CC | Secondary | 0.126 | 3.891 | 2 | 54 | 0.026 | 61.562 | −0.695 | 0.003 |
| bSC | Secondary | 0.088 | 2.615 | 2 | 54 | 0.082 | 17.262 | 0.056 | 0 |
FIGURE 7Network pharmacology analysis: (A): Venn diagram of common target genes. (B): PPI network map of common target genes. (C): GO function bubble diagram. (D): KEGG pathway chart. (E): Drug-disease-target-pathway network map.