| Literature DB >> 36016182 |
Ewa Bojkiewicz1, Kacper Toczylowski1, Sambor Grygorczuk2, Beata Zelazowska-Rutkowska3, Justyna Dunaj2, Agnieszka Zebrowska4, Piotr Czupryna2, Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska2, Artur Sulik1.
Abstract
In Poland, tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination rate is low despite high incidence of severe infections with TBE virus (TBEV). However, infection with TBEV can be asymptomatic or mild, which makes the total number of cases difficult to assess. We aimed at assessing asymptomatic TBEV infections and describing attitudes towards the TBE vaccine. We studied 298 healthy adult blood donors and 180 children from the TBE endemic area of northeastern Poland for the presence of anti-TBEV IgG antibodies. We also surveyed a separate cohort of 444 adults. Thirty-eight blood donors (13%) and 38 survey respondents (9%) reported a history of a prior anti-TBEV vaccination. Forty respondents (9%) reported vaccinating their child in the past. Fourteen unvaccinated blood donors (5%) and four children (2%) were seropositive for specific anti-TBEV antibodies, suggesting a history of an undiagnosed TBEV infection. In the surveyed cohort, 130 (32%) expressed their intention to be vaccinated and 144 (36%) expressed their intention to vaccinate their child. This intention was significantly higher in respondents with a recent tick-bite, a diagnosis of tick-borne disease in a close relative, and in males. Our study shows that asymptomatic TBEV infections are common. The acceptance of TBE vaccine is low, but might be increased by communicating risks associated with tick bites.Entities:
Keywords: Poland; TBEV vaccination; blood donors; seroprevalence; tick-borne encephalitis; tick-borne encephalitis virus
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016182 PMCID: PMC9412675 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Characteristics of surveyed parents of children hospitalized in the Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases in Bialystok.
| Individual—Related Characteristic | Number (%) |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Male | 74/419 (17.7%) |
| Female | 345/419 (82.3%) |
|
|
|
| <29 | 76/426 (17.8%) |
| 30–39 | 252/426 (59.2%) |
| 40–49 | 85/426 (20%) |
| 50–59 | 11/426 (2.6%) |
| >60 | 2/426 (0.4%) |
|
|
|
| Primary | 11/426 (2.6%) |
| Secondary | 134/426 (31.4%) |
| Higher | 281/426 (66%) |
|
|
|
| Village | 175/426 (41.1%) |
| City more than 30,000 inhabitants | 251/426 (58.9%) |
|
| 104/433 (24%) |
|
| 270/438 (61.6%) |
|
| 75/444 (16.9%) |
|
| 139/433 (32.1%) |
Data presented as frequencies and percentages. Denominators lower than the study group indicate missing data. Abbreviations: TBD, tick-borne disease.
Figure 1Binominal logistic regression analysis of variables associated with the odds of receiving or declaration to receive the TBE vaccine. The age-related odds were calculated with reference to age under 30 years. Abbreviations: TBD, tick-borne disease.
Figure 2Binominal logistic regression analysis of variables associated with the odds of vaccinating or declaration to vaccinate the respondent’s child with the TBE vaccine. The age-related odds were calculated with reference to age under 30 years. Abbreviations: TBD, tick-borne disease.