| Literature DB >> 36015934 |
Delmas Vidal Tabe Ebunang1, Kevin Yemele Tajeu1, Chancellin Nkepdep Pecheu1, Sherman Lesly Zambou Jiokeng1,2,3, Arnaud Kamdem Tamo4,5,6, Ingo Doench4,5,6, Anayancy Osorio-Madrazo4,5,6, Ignas Kenfack Tonle1, Emmanuel Ngameni7.
Abstract
In this work, an electrode modified with an amino-functionalized clay mineral was used for the electrochemical analysis and quantification of quercetin (QCT). The resulting amine laponite (LaNH2) was used as modifier for a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The organic-inorganic hybrid material was structurally characterized using X-ray diffraction, Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and CHN elemental analysis. The covalent grafting of the organosilane to the clay backbone was confirmed. The charge on the aminated laponite, both without and with the protonation of NH2 groups, was evaluated via cyclic voltammetry. On the protonated amine (LaNH3+)-modified GCE, the cyclic voltammograms for QCT showed two oxidation peaks and one reduction peak in the range of -0.2 V to 1.2 V in a phosphate buffer-ethanol mixture at pH 3. By using the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), the modification showed an increase in the electrode performance and a strong pH dependence. The experimental conditions were optimized, with the results showing that the peak current intensity of the DPV increased linearly with the QCT concentration in the range from 2 × 10-7 M to 2 × 10-6 M, leading to a detection limit of 2.63 × 10-8 M (S/N 3). The sensor selectivity was also evaluated in the presence of interfering species. Finally, the proposed aminated organoclay-modified electrode was successfully applied for the detection of QCT in human urine. The accuracy of the results achieved with the sensor was evaluated by comparing the results obtained using UV-visible spectrometry.Entities:
Keywords: amino-laponite; modified electrode; quercetin; voltammetry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015934 PMCID: PMC9414484 DOI: 10.3390/s22166173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Scheme 1Chemical structure of the quercetin (QCT) molecule.
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (A) and infrared spectra (B) of pristine laponite La and amino-functionalized laponite LaNH2 materials.
Figure 2Thermogravimetric analysis (curves 1) and differential thermal gravimetry (curves 2) curves of unmodified La (A) and amino-functionalized laponite LaNH2 (B).
Figure 3Scanning electronic microscopy images of unmodified La (a) and amino-functionalized laponite LaNH2 (b).
Figure 4Multisweep cyclic voltammograms recorded in 10−2 M HCl containing 5 × 10−4 M (Fe(CN)6)3− on a glass carbon electrode (GCE) modified with (A) LaNH2 and (B) LaNH3+ materials. The inset in Figure 4A represents the same experiment on the GCE covered by a thin film of unmodified La.
Figure 5Differential pulse voltammograms (DPV) for 10−4 M of quercetin (QCT) in (v/v) phosphate buffer and EtOH mixture solution (pH 2) in (a) LaNH2/GCE, (b) La/GCE, (c) GCE and (d) LaNH3+/GCE working electrodes.
Figure 6(A) Variations in scan rate on LaNH3+/GCE immersed in 0.1 M of 50:50 (v/v) phosphate buffer and EtOH mixture solution (pH = 2) in the presence of 5 × 10−4 M of QCT. (B) A plot of Ipa = f (v1/2). (C) A plot of logIpa = f (logv). (D) A plot of Epa = f (logv).
Figure 7(A) Variation in pH values of (v/v) phosphate buffer and EtOH mixture solution on LaNH3+/GCE in the presence of 10−4 M of QCT. (B) The curves of ipa = f (pH) and Epa = f(pH).
Scheme 2The proposed electrochemical redox reaction of quercetin.
Figure 8DPV voltammograms of QCT in a LaNH3+/GCE sensor at different concentrations (0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 µM). Inset: Plot of ipa vs. quercetin concentrations (QCT) in a 50:50 (v/v) phosphate buffer and EtOH mixture solution (pH 3).
Comparison of the performances of the LaNH3+/GCE sensor with those of other GCE-modified electrodes applied to the electroanalysis of quercetin.
| GCE Modifier | Linear Range | Detection Limit | Real Sample | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graphene | 0.006–10 | 0.0036 | Apple, onion | [ |
| MWCNTs dispersed in | 2–11 | 0.2 | Onion | [ |
| poly (safranine O) | 0.01–8 | 0.005 | Wine, Fruit Juice | [ |
| TEOS@Fe2O3 | 1–9 | 0.092 | Apple tea | [ |
| PtNPs/PEDOT-MeOH | 0.04–91 | 0.052 | Apple juice | [ |
| Aminated laponite | 0.2–2 | 0.0263 | Human urine | This work |
MWCNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes; TEOS@Fe2O3: tetraethylorthosilicate coated to magnetic Fe2O3; PtNPs: Pt nanoparticles; PEDOT: poly(hydroxymethylated-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene).
Figure 9Influence of various potentially interfering compounds on the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) response in the presence of quercetin (QCT) at 10−4 M.
Determination of QCT in urine sample.
| DPV | UV-Visible | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | QCT Added | QCT Found | Recovery (%) | QCT Found | Recovery (%) |
| 1 | 0.4 | 0.38 | 96.20 | 0.55 | 137 |
| 2 | 0.8 | 0.77 | 97.70 | 0.94 | 117 |
| 3 | 1.2 | 1.17 | 97.20 | 1.39 | 116 |
| 4 | 1.6 | 1.56 | 97.50 | 1.73 | 108 |