| Literature DB >> 36015590 |
Minhua Li1, Xue Dong1, Tieling Xing1, Guoqiang Chen1.
Abstract
Silk, a natural protein fiber, is widely used in the textile industry and biomedical materials for its excellent properties. However, its application in some fields is seriously restricted due to its poor anti-wrinkle behavior. In this study, 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine (TLP) was used in the production of anti-wrinkle silk fabrics. The optimum finishing conditions were as follows: 3-g/L 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine, 6-g/L NaHCO3, 8-g/L Na2SO4, finishing temperature of 65 °C, and finishing time of 40 min. The crease recovery angle of the finished fabric is 16-20% higher than the unfinished fabric, and the finishing process has a small effect on the whiteness of silk while achieving some degree of washing resistance. The morphology and chemical structures of the finished silk fabric were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The K/S value of the finished silk fabric dyed with reactive dyes increased compared with the silk fabric only dyed, indicating that the dyeability of the finished fabric was improved. This technology provides a new method for fabricating silk color crease-resistant fabrics.Entities:
Keywords: 2,4,6-trichloropyrimidine; anti-crease finishing; reactive dyes; silk fabric
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015590 PMCID: PMC9415022 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Schematic of the preparation process of anti-wrinkle silk fabric.
Effect of particle size of finishing agent emulsion on crease recovery angle of finishing silk fabric.
| The Sample | Emulsification Method | Mean Particle Size (nm) | Dispersion Coefficient | DCRA (°) | WCRA (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Method 1 | 1450.2 | 0.435 | 257 | 221 |
| 2 | Method 2 | 287.9 | 0.183 | 284 | 234 |
Figure 2Effects of reaction condition on anti-wrinkle of TLP-finished silk fabric. (a) Concentration of TLP dispersions; (b) concentration of NaHCO2; (c) finishing temperature; (d) finishing time.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of (a) control and (b) TLP-finished silk fabrics.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of control and TLP-finished silk fabrics.
Washability of finished fabric.
| Before Washing | SD | 10 Washings | SD | 20 Washings | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silk | WCRA (°) | 198.5 ± 4.5 | 4.6 | 185.3 ± 4.1 | 3.9 | 172.8 ± 5.0 | 4.9 |
| DCRA (°) | 223.4 ± 6.1 | 5.9 | 208.5 ± 5.7 | 5.6 | 195.2 ± 5.6 | 5.5 | |
| TLP-silk | WCRA (°) | 247.2 ± 5.6 | 5.2 | 238.6 ± 6.2 | 6.3 | 220.3 ± 6.7 | 6.3 |
| DCRA (°) | 268.1 ± 4.8 | 4.7 | 256.1 ± 4.4 | 4.2 | 241.6 ± 4.9 | 4.9 | |
Fracture strength retention rate and whiteness of finished and control silk.
| Fracture Strength Retention Rate (%) | Whiteness WI CIE [D65/10] | |
|---|---|---|
| Silk | - | 69.9 ± 2.3 |
| TLP-silk (2 g/L) | 98.7 ± 1.2 | 68.5 ± 1.9 |
| TLP-silk (3 g/L) | 97.6 ± 0.7 | 68.7 ± 1.7 |
| TLP-silk (4 g/L) | 96.3 ± 1.1 | 68.4 ± 2.0 |
Strong retention analysis of variance.
| The First Test | The Second Test | The Third Test | The Fourth Test | The Fifth Test | Average Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99.5 | 98.2 | 97.9 | 99.0 | 98.9 | 98.7 |
| 2 | 98.6 | 96.4 | 97.1 | 98.3 | 97.6 | 97.6 |
| 3 | 95.2 | 96.9 | 97.4 | 95.9 | 96.1 | 96.3 |
| The total average | 97.53 | |||||
| MSA | 21.65 | |||||
| MSE | 1.45 | |||||
| F(MSA/MSE) | 14.93 > 1 | |||||
Analysis of variance for whiteness.
| The First Test | The Second Test | The Third Test | The Fourth Test | Average Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68.1 | 69.7 | 70.4 | 65.8 | 68.5 |
| 2 | 68.4 | 65.9 | 69.9 | 70.6 | 68.7 |
| 3 | 70.4 | 68.8 | 65.7 | 68.7 | 68.4 |
| The total average | 68.53 | ||||
| MSA | 0.28 | ||||
| MSE | 1.57 | ||||
| F(MSA/MSE) | 0.18 < 1 | ||||
K/S value, color parameters, and washing fastness of finished and control silk fabrics.
| Process | K/S | Colour Parameter | Washing Fastness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | C* | H | |||
| Silk (2%owf) | 11.38 | 32.53 | −7.65 | −16.64 | 18.32 | 245.31 | 4 |
| Method 1 | 11.45 | 32.8 | −7.52 | −16.89 | 18.49 | 246.01 | 4 |
| Method 2 (2%owf) | 7.61 | 39.87 | −10.63 | −17.18 | 20.2 | 238.25 | 3–4 |
| Method 2 (4%owf) | 12.36 | 30.7 | −6.98 | −16.34 | 17.45 | 247.27 | 3–4 |
| Method 3 | 14.08 | 28.88 | −5.97 | −15.8 | 16.89 | 249.3 | 4–5 |
Figure 5Wrinkle resistance of dyed fabrics.
Dye uptake of different types of dyes in different dyeing and finishing processes.
| Type of Dye | Process | Dyeing Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Monochloro triazine type | Method 1 | 83.6 |
| vinyl sulphone type | 85.8 | |
| double reactive type | 89.6 | |
| Monochloro triazine type | Method 2 | 58.7 |
| vinyl sulphone type | 75.1 | |
| double reactive type | 83.0 | |
| Monochloro triazine type | Method 3 | 85.1 |
| vinyl sulphone type | 87.9 | |
| double reactive type | 91.6 |