| Literature DB >> 36015569 |
Eduarda Chiabai Rodrigues de Melo1, Mayara de Oliveira Camillo1, Paulo Roberto Correia Marcelino1, Roseméri Barbosa Dos Santos da Silva1, Thierry Colares Firmino1, Bárbara Ferreira de Oliveira2, Demetrius Profeti3, Artur Camposo Pereira4, Sergio Neves Monteiro4, Michel Picanço Oliveira1.
Abstract
Natural lignocellulosic fibers (NLFs) have been extensively investigated and applied as reinforcements for polymers composites owing to improved properties associated with their cost-effectiveness and their sustainable characteristics as compared to synthetic fibers. However, an intrinsic difficulty of the hydrophilic NFL adhesion to a hydrophobic polymer matrix is still a major limitation, which might be overcome via fiber surface treatments. Among the less-known NLFs, sponge gourd (Lufta cylindrica) is a promising reinforcement for polymer composites owing to its natural network of intertwined fibers. The present work investigated for the first time the influence of a chemical treatment using silane as a coupling agent for 30 wt.% sponge gourd incorporated into a polyester matrix composite. The novel composite performance was compared with that of an untreated fiber composite via X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Charpy impact tests, and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). The XRD results revealed that the silanization increased the crystallinity index by 37%, which attests to the effective fiber-matrix interaction stretching of the C-H bond, as observed in its FTIR band. The silanization also increased the mean impact resistance by 10%. Although the temperatures associated with the beginning of the thermal degradation by the TGA were not affected, both the silane-treated fibers and composite displayed less thermal degradation compared with the untreated fibers. The scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) results disclosed an improved sponge gourd fiber morphology after the silanization, which caused greater adherence to the polyester matrix. These results revealed a promising novel composite compared with other NLF polymer composites in engineering applications.Entities:
Keywords: chemical treatment; lignocellulosic fiber; mechanical proprieties; polymer; sponge gourd
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015569 PMCID: PMC9415829 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1(a) Sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica) fibers as received and (b) after cleaning and being used for reinforcement in composites.
Results reported for sponge-gourd-reinforced polymer matrix composites [16].
| Polymer | Fiber-Resin Ratio (wt.%) | Impact Strength (KJ/m2) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyester | 50:50 | 29.32 | 46.47 | 57.36 | 3.58 |
| Epoxy | 13:87 | 6.67 | 27.00 | 55.00 | 2.41 |
| HDPE | 40:60 | 34.70 | 20.80 | 37.70 | 1.08 |
| Polypropylene | 55:45 | 31.29 | 37.17 | 19.40 | 1.70 |
Figure 2Polyester composites reinforced with 30 wt.% sponge gourd fibers after the Charpy impact test.
Lignocellulosic compositions of untreated and silanized Luffa cylindrica fibers.
| Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) | Extractives (%) | Ashes (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural fiber | 33.36 ± 1.30 | 38.44 ± 1.30 | 12.32 ± 0.49 | 12.15 ± 0.29 | 0.49 ± 0.05 |
| Silanized fiber | 36.26 ± 1.03 | 32.48 ± 1.03 | 20.47 ± 2.37 | 15.01 ± 0.13 | 8.24 ± 0.15 |
Figure 3Comparative XRD curves for (a) in natura and silanized sponge gourd, (b) neat polyester. and composites reinforced with 30 wt.% fiber with and without treatment.
The crystallinity index (CI) of natural sponge gourd fibers, silanized fibers, neat polyester, and composites reinforced with 30 wt.% fiber.
| LCF/Composites | Crystalline Index, CI (%) |
|---|---|
| Natural fiber | 73.56% |
| Silanized fiber | 77.76% |
| Neat polyester | 6.21% |
| 30 wt.% fiber | 6.67% |
| 30 wt.% silanized fiber | 9.16% |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of (a) natural and silanized sponge gourd fibers and (b) polyester composites reinforced with 30 wt.% of natural and silanized sponge gourd fibers.
Figure 5Variation of the absorbed impact energy of the neat polyester and composites reinforced with 30 wt.% sponge gourd fiber contents.
ANOVA analysis of the impact strengths of neat polyester and composites reinforced with 30 wt.% in natura and silanized sponge gourd fibers.
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | P (Same) | F (Critical) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between composites | 608.1347 | 4 | 152.0337 | 30.587 | 2.88 × 10−8 | 2.86608 |
| Within groups | 99.41067 | 20 | 4.970533 | |||
| Total | 707.5454 | 24 |
Tuckey test applied via pairwise comparison (Q/p) for the impact strengths of neat polyester and composites reinforced with 30 wt.% in natura of in natura and silanized sponge gourd fibers.
| Neat Polyester | 30 wt.% Fiber | 30 wt.% Silanized Fiber | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neat polyester |
|
| |
| 30 wt.% in natura fiber | 11.95 | 0.9137 | |
| 30 wt.% silanized fiber | 13.14 | 1.193 |
Figure 6Thermogram (TG) and derivative of thermogravimetry (DTG) for natural sponge gourd fiber and silanized fiber.
Figure 7Comparative thermogram and derivative of thermogravimetry (DTG) of neat polyester, whereby the composites were reinforced with 30 wt.% sponge gourd fibers, both without treatment and silanized.
Figure 8EDS map of Luffa cylindrica fibers after the silanization treatment.
Figure 9Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) untreated sponge gourd fibers at 30×, (b) silanized fibers at 30×, (c) a 30 wt.% sponge gourd fiber-reinforced polyester polymer composite at 100×, and (d) a silanized 30 wt.% sponge gourd fiber-reinforced polymer composite at 110×.