| Literature DB >> 36015504 |
Tatiana Kojnoková1, František Nový1,2, Lenka Markovičová1.
Abstract
The present research deals with the investigation of the influence of aqueous solutions of chemical substances in combination with temperature on the change of material properties of polymer composites based on epoxy resins reinforced with carbon fibers. The aim of the research was to investigate and evaluate the impact of degradation processes due to the influence of chemical environments of different temperatures and time of their action on changes in the material properties and macrostructure of carbon composite with epoxy resin. The chemical and thermal influence of the environment on the experimental material was evaluated by monitoring changes in mechanical properties, glass transition temperature, and material surface macrostructure. The achieved results show different behavior of the experimental composite material in different environments, while it was demonstrated that the degradation effect of chemical and thermal influences on changes in material properties increase with increasing temperature. Among the investigated environments (NaCl, NaOH, and H2SO4), exposure to 10% NaOH, and 15% H2SO4 had the greatest degradation influence on the polymer composite, and exposure to 20% NaCl had the smallest influence, which is also confirmed by invisible changes in material surface macrostructure and decrease of tensile strength by about 20%. Exposure to 10% NaOH resulted in significant surface roughening of the epoxy resin, white deposit creation on the surface, and a decrease of tensile strength by 35%. Opposite that, exposure to 15% H2SO4 resulted in the highlighting of the fiber yarns of the carbon fiber fabric, yellowing of the surface, surface pore occurrence, and a decrease of tensile strength by 35%.Entities:
Keywords: carbon composite with epoxy resin; chemical and thermal influence; glass transition temperature; material surface macrostructure; mechanical properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015504 PMCID: PMC9416301 DOI: 10.3390/polym14163245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Examples of conducted research on the influence of chemical environments and humidity on composites.
| Research | Material | Types of Conditioning | Variables | Methodology | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | GFRP | NaOH, HCl | alkaline and acid solution, time | three-point | A decrease in flexural strength and flexural |
| [ | CFRP | water | temperature | immersion | Degradation and |
| [ | GFRP | hydraulic fluid, | types of | absorption, three-point bending test, impact test | A greater reduction |
| [ | GFRP | salt fog and immersion into salt water | time | tensile test | GFRP laminates decreased their tensile strength after immersion in salt water. |
| [ | CFRP | water, salt water, | type of | tensile test, | An adverse effect on |
| [ | GFRP | hygrothermal | temperature | moisture absorption, tensile test, dynamic mechanical analysis, SEM | Increased temperature accelerates the absorption |
| [ | pultruded carbon/glass hybrid rod | underground oil well-exposure | exposure | the long-term | The short beam shear strength and interface shear strength of rods decreased with the exposure time. Higher exposed temperature and |
| [ | basalt- and glass-fiber-reinforced polymer bars | seawater | synergistic effect of sustained load and corrosion environment | scanning | SEM results reveal the degradation mechanism of BFRP bars in |
Figure 1Production of the CFRP composite; (a) preparation flow chart; (b) curing cycle in the autoclave.
Characteristics of experimental CFRP composite.
| Layer | Orientation | Carbon Fiber Fabric | Epoxy Resin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 0/90° | GG280T(T300) | DT121HT-42 KE |
| 2. | ±45° | ||
| 3. | 0/90° |
Exposure conditions.
| Weeks of Immersion | Chemical Solution (wt. %) | Temperature (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 20% NaCl | 23 |
| 6 | 10% NaOH | 40 |
| 9 | 15% H2SO4 | 60 |
Figure 2Material surface changes of the experimental CFRP composite; magnification 20× (after 9 weeks); (a) reference material before the test; (b) after 9 weeks of exposure to 20% NaCl at 60 °C; (c) after 9 weeks of exposure to 10% NaOH at 60 °C; (d) after 9 weeks of exposure to 15% H2SO4 at 60 °C.
Figure 3Material surface changes of the experimental CFRP composite; magnification 20× (after 9 weeks); (a) reference material before the test; (b) after 9 weeks of exposure to 20% NaCl at 60 °C; (c) after 9 weeks of exposure to 10% NaOH at 60 °C; (d) after 9 weeks of exposure to 15% H2SO4 at 60 °C.
Figure 4Influence of exposure to 20% NaCl at different temperatures on the CFRP composite.
Figure 5Influence of exposure to 10% NaOH at different temperatures on the CFRP composite.
Figure 6Influence of exposure to 15% H2SO4 at different temperatures on the CFRP composite.
Figure 7Influence of the time of exposure to 20% NaCl, 10% NaOH, and 15% H2SO4 at 60 °C on tensile stress-strain curves of the CFRP composite.
Figure 8Influence of exposure to 20% NaCl at different temperatures on the CFRP composite; (a) flexural strength; (b) flexural modulus.
Figure 9Influence of exposure to 10% NaOH at different temperatures on the CFRP composite; (a) flexural strength; (b) flexural modulus.
Figure 10Influence of exposure to 15% H2SO4 at different temperatures on the CFRP composite; (a) flexural strength; (b) flexural modulus.
Figure 11DMA of the CFRP composite evaluated depending on the influence of individual chemical environments at 23 °C; (a) complex modulus of elasticity; (b) tan delta.
Figure 12DMA of the CFRP composite evaluated depending on the influence of individual chemical environments at 40 °C; (a) complex modulus of elasticity; (b) tan delta.
Figure 13DMA of the CFRP composite evaluated depending on the influence of individual chemical environments at 60 °C; (a) complex modulus of elasticity; (b) tan delta.
The glass transition temperature is determined by the dependence of the complex modulus of elasticity on temperature.
| Chemical Solution | Temperature | Tg1 |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | 122.95 |
| 20% NaCl | 23 | 113.64 |
| 40 | 107.95 | |
| 60 | 102.27 | |
| 10% NaOH | 23 | 110.80 |
| 40 | 107.95 | |
| 60 | 93.75 | |
| 15% H2SO4 | 23 | 107.95 |
| 40 | 106.82 | |
| 60 | 96.59 |
The glass transition temperature is determined by the dependence of the tan delta on temperature.
| Chemical Solution | Temperature | Tg1 | Tg2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | 138.24 | |
| 20% NaCl | 23 | 120.59 | |
| 40 | 123.53 | ||
| 60 | 116.28 | 126.47 | |
| 10% NaOH | 23 | 126.47 | |
| 40 | 120.59 | ||
| 60 | 111.76 | 123.53 | |
| 15% H2SO4 | 23 | 120.59 | |
| 40 | 117.65 | ||
| 60 | 117.76 | 125.25 |
Decrease in the tensile strength and flexural strength of the CFRP composite.
| Mechanical Property | 3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | 9 Weeks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile strength | 20% NaCl at 40 °C | 10% NaOH at 60 °C by 35.13% | 15% H2SO4 at 40 °C by 34.83% |
| Flexural strength | 10% NaOH at 60 °C by 27.13% | 10% NaOH at 60 °C by 29.97% | 10% NaOH at 60 °C by 29.96% |