| Literature DB >> 36015482 |
Tadashi Abe1, Masashi Ito2, Ryuichi Takahashi2, Toshimitsu Honma3, Masato Kuramata1, Satoru Ishikawa1.
Abstract
Phytoextraction by high-Cd-accumulating rice lacking a functional OsHMA3 allele is promising for Cd removal from paddy soils. To increase rice Cd extraction efficiency, we developed a new high-Cd variety, TJN25-11. For this, we pyramided a nonfunctional OsHMA3 allele from a high-Cd variety, Jarjan, and two QTLs for increased shoot Cd concentrations, which were discovered in a mapping population derived from a high-Cd variety, Nepal 555, and a low-Cd variety, Tachisugata. In two Cd-contaminated paddy fields under drained aerobic soil conditions, TJN25-11 presented significantly higher Cd concentrations in the straw and panicles than the OsHMA3-deficient varieties TJTT8 and Cho-ko-koku. Among the varieties, TJN25-11 had a relatively high shoot biomass, resulting in the highest Cd accumulation in the shoots. The soil Cd decreased by approximately 20% after TJN25-11 growth. The amount of Cd that accumulated in the TJN25-11 aerial parts was much greater than the amount of Cd that decreased in the topsoil, suggesting that Cd was absorbed from deeper soil layers. Thus, we revealed the effects of QTL pyramiding on shoot Cd accumulation and Cd phytoextraction efficiency. Since TJN25-11 has favorable agronomic traits for compatibility with Japanese cultivation systems, this variety could be useful for Cd phytoextraction in Cd-contaminated paddy fields.Entities:
Keywords: Cd-accumulating ability; DNA marker-assisted breeding; cadmium; food safety; phytoextraction; rice; three-way cross
Year: 2022 PMID: 36015482 PMCID: PMC9415887 DOI: 10.3390/plants11162178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Agronomic traits and Cd accumulation ability of parental varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
| Variety | Days to Heading | Culm Length | Lodging Degree | Shattering Behavior | Cd Concentration | Total Amount of Cd Accumulation in Aerial Parts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straw | Grain | |||||||
| (cm) | (0–5) | (s-r) | (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg m−2) | |||
| Field A | Jarjan | 110 | 109 b | 0.0 | s | 10.0 a ± 6.0 | 8.7 a ± 8.1 | 8.8 a |
| Nepal 555 | 104 | 118 a | 4.0 | s | 8.6 a ± 6.3 | 2.0 ab ± 1.5 | 4.7 ab | |
| Tachisugata | 107 | 94 c | 0.0 | r | 4.0 a ± 3.0 | 1.3 b ± 1.0 | 2.1 b | |
| Field B | Jarjan | 115 | 129 a | 0.0 | s | 14.5 a ± 3.2 | 4.9 a ± 1.0 | 13.7 a |
| Nepal 555 | 107 | 126 a | 3.0 | s | 10.6 b ± 2.7 | 2.2 b ± 0.5 | 9.8 b | |
| Tachisugata | 111 | 101 b | 0.0 | r | 7.2 b ± 1.5 | 2.2 b ± 0.4 | 6.6 c | |
The data are the means ± standard deviations. The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey–Kramer test (only culm length in field B) or the Tukey test (other data). Lodging degree: 0 for all plants erect, 1 for <20% of the plants that became lodged, 2 for 20–40%, 3 for 40–60%, 4 for 60–80%, and 5 for 80–100% (few plants erect). Shattering was categorized as resistant (r), moderate (m), or susceptible (s) based on the percentage of shattering grains, i.e., less than 20%, more than 20% but less than 50%, and more than 50%, respectively, at 35–40 days after heading. The culm length was measured on 20 hills (although only Nepal 555 in field B was 10 hills). The sample number for Cd concentration and total amount of Cd accumulation were measured in three samples with two hills combined per plot. The experiment was performed on two plots.
Figure 1Breeding procedure used in this study. *: GH; greenhouse, F; field. **: TCS; Tachisugata, JRJ; Jarjan, NPL; Nepal555, TJTT line; TCS/JRJ//TCS///TCS (BC2F2), TNT line; TCS/NPL//TCS (BC1F2).
Figure 2Plant shape (A) of TJN25-11 and Tachisugata and grain shapes (B) of TJN25-11 and Koshihikari grown in the field.
Positions and effects of putative QTLs for high Cd concentration in rice straw.
| Chr. | QTL | Marker Interval | Nearest Marker | LOD * | R2 ** | AE *** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
| RM1211-RM5303 | RM1385 | 4.57 | 18.8 | 1.05 |
| 6 |
| RM3414-RM2615 | RM8258 | 5.76 | 22.8 | −1.17 |
*: After 1000-permutation tests, the threshold values of the LOD for Cd concentrations of straw were calculated as 4.0. **: R2 represents the proportion of the phenotypic variance explained by each QTL. ***: A negative value of the additive effect (AE) indicates that the allele from Nepal 555 increased the phenotypic value.
Agronomic traits of rice varieties grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
| Variety | Days to Heading | Culm Length | Straw Weight | Panicle Weight | Lodging Degree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (cm) | (g m−2) | (g m−2) | (0–5) | |||
| Field A | TJN25-11 | 117 | 94 a ± 3.2 | 992 a ± 60 | 332 a ± 39 | 0 |
| TJTT8 | 116 | 81 b ± 1.3 | 922 a ± 9 | 237 a ± 53 | 0 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 112 | 82 b ± 3.2 | 651 b ± 89 | 594 b ± 110 | 2 | |
| Field B | TJN25-11 | 123 | 102 a ± 4.1 | 777 a ± 75 | 150 a ± 18 | 0 |
| TJTT8 | 121 | 94 a ± 1.8 | 784 a ± 69 | 137 a ± 12 | 0 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 115 | 100 a ± 4.6 | 613 b ± 40 | 328 b ± 48 | 3 |
The data are the means ± standard deviations. The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey test. Lodging degree: 0 for all plants erect, 1 for <20% of the plants that became lodged, 2 for 20–40%, 3 for 40–60%, 4 for 60–80%, and 5 for 80–100% (few plants erect). The culm length was measured on 10 hills per plot. The weight of the straw and panicles were measured for 20 hills per plot. The experiment was performed on three plots.
Cd concentration and amount of Cd accumulated in rice grown under early drainage water management in two farmers’ fields.
| Variety | Cd Concentration | Amount of Cd That Accumulated * | Total Amount of Cd that Accumulated in Aerial Parts ** | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straw | Panicle | Straw | Panicle | |||
| (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg m−2) | (mg m−2) | (mg m−2) | ||
| Field A | TJN25-11 | 24.5 a ± 2.9 | 37.4 a ± 5.5 | 24.2 a ± 1.7 | 12.3 a ± 0.7 | 36.5 a ± 2.2 |
| TJTT8 | 19.7 a ± 2.6 | 26.4 a ± 4.3 | 18.2 ab ± 2.4 | 6.1 b ± 0.3 | 24.3 b ± 2.3 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 18.2 a ± 3.4 | 11.2 b ± 4.7 | 12.0 b ± 3.3 | 6.3 b ± 1.4 | 18.3 b ± 4.8 | |
| Field B | TJN25-11 | 21.1 a ± 1.4 | 27.9 a ± 2.4 | 16.3 a ± 1.7 | 4.2 a ± 0.2 | 20.5 a ± 1.6 |
| TJTT8 | 15.0 b ± 1.3 | 15.8 b ± 2.4 | 11.8 b ± 1.8 | 2.2 b ± 0.4 | 14.0 b ± 2.0 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 12.8 b ± 0.7 | 5.7 c ± 0.4 | 7.9 c ± 0.8 | 1.9 b ± 0.4 | 9.7 c ± 1.1 | |
The data are the means ± standard deviations (n = 3). The different letters show statistically significant differences between varieties at the 5% level of significance according to the Tukey test. The experiment included three repetitions. *: Amount of Cd that accumulated in each tissue, calculated by multiplying the Cd concentration by dry weight (cited from Table 3). **: Total amount of Cd that accumulated, calculated from sum of the amounts of Cd in the straw and panicles.
Changes in soil Cd concentrations before and after planting and phytoextraction efficiency.
| Variety | Soil Cd Concentration (0.1 M HCl Extractable) | Average Amount of Cd in the Soil | Total Amount of Cd That Accumulated in Aerial Parts (F) *** | Phytoextraction Efficiency | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Reduction | Actual Reduction Rate of Soil Cd # | Theoretical Reduction Rate of Soil Cd $ | |||
| (mg kg−1) | (mg kg−1) | (mg m−2) | (mg m−2) | (mg m−2) | (mg m−2) | (%) | (%) | ||
| Field A | TJN25-11 | 0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 49.5 | 39.0 | 10.5 | 36.5 | 21.2 | 73.7 |
| TJTT8 | 0.34 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 51.0 | 45.0 | 6.0 | 24.3 | 11.8 | 47.6 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 48.0 | 45.0 | 3.0 | 18.3 | 6.3 | 38.1 | |
| Field B | TJN25-11 | 0.51 ± 0.00 | 0.40 ± 0.06 | 76.5 | 60.0 | 16.5 | 20.5 | 21.6 | 26.8 |
| TJTT8 | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 79.5 | 70.5 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 11.3 | 17.6 | |
| Cho-ko-koku | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | 75.0 | 69.0 | 6.0 | 9.7 | 8.0 | 12.9 | |
The soil Cd concentration data are the means ± standard deviations (n = 3). The other data are the means. *, **, (A or B) × (topsoil depth: 0–15 cm) × (soil bulk density: 1) × (area). ***, Each value is cited in Table 4. #, (E/C) × 100. $, (F/C) × 100.