| Literature DB >> 36014691 |
Sarkar Siddique1, James C L Chow2,3.
Abstract
Cancer theranostics is the combination of diagnosis and therapeutic approaches for cancer, which is essential in personalized cancer treatment. The aims of the theranostics application of nanoparticles in cancer detection and therapy are to reduce delays in treatment and hence improve patient care. Recently, it has been found that the functionalization of nanoparticles can improve the efficiency, performance, specificity and sensitivity of the structure, and increase stability in the body and acidic environment. Moreover, functionalized nanoparticles have been found to possess a remarkable theranostic ability and have revolutionized cancer treatment. Each cancer treatment modality, such as MRI-guided gene therapy, MRI-guided thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermia treatment, MRI-guided chemotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal and photodynamic therapy, has its strengths and weaknesses, and combining modalities allows for a better platform for improved cancer control. This is why cancer theranostics have been investigated thoroughly in recent years and enabled by functionalized nanoparticles. In this topical review, we look at the recent advances in cancer theranostics using functionalized nanoparticles. Through understanding and updating the development of nanoparticle-based cancer theranostics, we find out the future challenges and perspectives in this novel type of cancer treatment.Entities:
Keywords: MRI-guided therapy; biomedical imaging; cancer theranostics; cancer therapy; functionalized nanoparticles; molecular imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014691 PMCID: PMC9416120 DOI: 10.3390/nano12162826
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Advantages using nanoparticles in cancer theranostics.
Figure 2Superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs being used in liver imaging and lymph node imaging. (A,B): T2-weighted MR image of a liver with a large hepatocellular carcinoma before (A) and after (B) the administration of SPION. The lesion is demarcated with arrows. (C,D): Standard (C) and SPION-based contrast-enhanced (D) MR imaging of liver metastasis in a patient with colorectal cancer. After administration of ferumoxide SPION, a second metastasis becomes visible on T2-weighted MR image. (E,H): Lymph node in left iliac region (arrow), with and without metastatic infiltration. T2-weighted images before (E,G) and 24 h after (F,H) administration of ferumoxtran. Lymph node (arrow) appears bright before injection of UPIO (E,G). One day after injection, a signal loss in the lymph node (arrow) due to high UPIO macrophage uptake can be observed, thus indicating functionality and no metastasis (F). Conversely, in the lower panel, the lymph node (arrow) stays bright, indicating no trafficking of USPIO and thus metastatic colonization (H). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 3Applications of inorganic NPs for cancer therapy and imaging. Reproduced with permission from [40]. Copyright 2017 ACS Publications.
Figure 4Schematic diagram showing applications of functionalized magnetic NPs in MRI-based diagnosis and anticancer therapy. Reproduced with permission from [55]. Copyright Anani et al. 2020.
Figure 5Schematic diagram showing the physiological and biological effects of gold nanoparticle-mediated photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT). A large amount of gold nanoparticles accumulate due to the leaky vasculature of the tumour, resulting in a photothermal effect in response to near-infrared (NIR) light and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by secondary delivered photosensitizer (PS), ultimately inducing apoptosis and necrosis of tumour tissue. Reproduced with permission from [74]. Copyright Kim et al. 2018.
Application of gold NPs in drug delivery. Reproduced with permission from [94].
| Nanoparticle | Nanoparticle Size (nm) | Outcome | Cell Lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTX-AuNP | 8–80 | Higher cytotoxicity towards numerous cell lines as compared to free MTX. Suppression of tumour growth with MTX-AuNP but not with free MTX. | Lewis lung carcinoma (LL2) cells |
| DOX-Hyd@AuNP | 30 | Enhanced toxicity against multi drug-resistant cancer cells. | MCF-7/ADR cancer cells |
| (Pt(R,R-dach))-AuNP | 26.7 | Platinum-tethering exhibited higher cytotoxicity as compared to free oxaliplatin | A549 lung epithelial |
| Tfpep-AuNP conjugated with photodynamic pro-drug Pc 4 | 5.1 | Cellular uptake of targeted particles was significantly higher than that of the non-targeted ones. | LN229 and U87 human |
| CPP-DOX-AuNP | 25 | Higher cell death as compared to previously tested 41 nm AuNP. | HeLa cells and A549 cells |
| FA-Au-SMCC-DOX | Enhanced drug accumulation and retention as compared to free DOX in multi drug-resistant cancer cells. | HepG2-R, C0045C | |
| FA-BHC-AuNP | 20–60 | Increased efficacy of BHC against cancer cells. | Vero and HeLa |
| Au-P(LA-DOX)-b-PEG-OH/FA NP | 34 | Enhanced cellular uptake and cytotoxicity against cancer cells. | 4T1 mouse mammary |
| DOX@PVP-AuNP | 12 | Induction of early and late apoptosis in lung cancer cells and upregulation of tumour suppression genes. | A549, H460 and H520 human lung cancer cells |
| DOX-BLM-PEG-AuNP | 10 | Enhanced half-maximal effective drug concentration, providing rationale for chemotherapy using two drugs. | HeLa cells |
| EpCam-RPAuN | 48 | The biomimetic nanoparticle loaded with PTX was used in combination treatment (PTT and chemotherapy). | 4T1 mouse mammary |
AuNP: gold nanoparticle, AuN: gold nanocage, BHC: berberine hydrochloride, BLM: bleomycin, CPP: cell penetrating peptides, DOX: doxorubicin, EpCam: epithelial cell adhesion molecule, FA: folic acid, Hyd: hydrazone, MTX: methotrexate, PEG: poly ethylene glycol, PLA: poly L-aspartate, (Pt (R,R-dach)): active ingredient of oxaliplatin, PTT: photothermal therapy, PTX: paclitaxel, PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone, SMCC: succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate, Tfpep: transferrin peptide.
Some tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in clinical practice. Reproduced with permission from [103]. Copyright 2010 Elsevier.
| Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor | Kinase Target(s) | FDA-Approved Indications |
|---|---|---|
| Dasatinib (Sprycel) | SRC, SFKs, BCR-ABL, c-KIT, PDGFR, c-FMS, EPHA2 | CML (2nd-line), Ph + ALL |
| Erlotinib (Tarceva) | EGFR | NSCLC |
| Gefitinib (Iressa) | EGFR | NSCLC |
| Imatinib (Gleevec/Glivec) | BCR-ABL, c-KIT, PDGFR | CML, Ph + ALL, GIST |
| Lapatinib (Tykerb) | EGFR, HER2/neu | Advanced breast cancer |
| Nilotinib (Tasigna) | BCR-ABL, c-KIT, PDGFR | CML (2nd-line) |
| Sorafenib (Nexavar) | VEGFR, PDGFR | Renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma |
| Sunitinib (Sutent) | VEGFR2, PDGFR, c-KIT, FLT3 | GIST, renal cell carcinoma |
CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EPHA, ephrin A; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumours; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; Ph + ALL, Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2.