| Literature DB >> 36014654 |
Aihemaitijiang Aihaiti1,2, Zongda Li1,2, Yanan Qin1,2, Fanxing Meng1,2, Xinbo Li1,2, Zekun Huangfu1,2, Keping Chen3, Minwei Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Excessive antibiotic residues in food can cause detrimental effects on human health. The establishment of rapid, sensitive, selective, and reliable methods for the detection of antibiotics is highly in demand. With the inherent advantages of high sensitivity, rapid analysis time, and facile miniaturization, the electrochemical sensors have great potential in the detection of antibiotics. The electrochemical platforms comprising carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) have been proposed to detect antibiotic residues. Notably, with the introduction of functional CNMs, the performance of electrochemical sensors can be bolstered. This review first presents the significance of functional CNMs in the detection of antibiotics. Subsequently, we provide an overview of the applications for detection by enhancing the electrochemical behaviour of the antibiotic, as well as a brief overview of the application of recognition elements to detect antibiotics. Finally, the trend and the current challenges of electrochemical sensors based on CNMs in the detection of antibiotics is outlined.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; aptamers; carbon nanotubes; electrochemical activity; functionalization; graphene; molecular imprinting
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014654 PMCID: PMC9414981 DOI: 10.3390/nano12162789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1An overview of functional CNMs and their application in the detection of antibiotics.
Different molecules are used to modify CNMs, their processing methods, and their properties.
| Carbon Nanomaterials | Modification | Processing | Morphology | Properties | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNTs | Ag NWs | Van der Waals interaction | Network structure | Facilitate the electron transfer. | [ |
| MWCNTs | Au NPs | In situ growth | Network structure | Good sensitivity, electron-transfer rate, and surface area. | [ |
| MWCNTs | Au NPs (10 nm) and cDNA | In situ growth | Tube with dark dots | High biological binding sites and good conductivity. | [ |
| GO | Au NRs | Drop-casting | Rod-shaped particles, dropped-plate pieces | Good surface conductivity and conductivity. | [ |
| Gr | Au NP (15 nm) and PDDA | In situ growth and electrochemical polymerization | Wrinkled flakes with bright dots | Good sensitivity and high selectivity. | [ |
| CNTs | Aptamer, Au NP (68 nm) and MoSe2 | Sonication and potentiostatic electrodeposition | Network structure with nanoflowers and spherical nanoparticles | Excellent selectivity and conductivity. | [ |
| ErGO | Au NP and Pb NP | Physisorption | Wrinkled, thin film with many small spherical structures | Efficient electrocatalytic activity and good sensitivity. | [ |
| ErGO | Ta2O5 | Sonication and potentiostatic electrodeposition | Crumpled-like surface structure with small particles | Large electroactive surface area and better adsorption. | [ |
| Gr | ZnO NRs | Sonication | The nanorods were intercalated between the sheets | High electric conductivity and sensitivity. | [ |
| MWCNT | FeCr2O4 (30 nm) | In situ growth | Entangled cross-linked fibrils with small particles | Good surface conductivity. | [ |
| GO | NiO NPs (24 nm) | Electrodeposition | Wrinkled sheets with multiple particles | Good surface conductivity. | [ |
| MWCNT | CuO | Sonochemical | Tube wrapped in spheres | Good conductivity and catalytic activity. | [ |
| rGO | NiFe2O4 (16.6 nm) | Hydrothermal method | Film with spherical-shaped particles | Good electron transfer and sensitivity. | [ |
| rGO | Poly(L-cysteine) and Au NPs | Electrodeposition and in-situ growth | Wrinkled film with dark dots | Large electroactive surface area and good conductivity. | [ |
| MWCNT | Poly(L-lysine) | Sonication | Tube surrounded by a blurry film | High biological binding sites and good conductivity. | [ |
| Gr | Poly(L-cysteine) | Electrodeposition | Small granular structure | Good conductivity and better adsorption. | [ |
| rGO | NH2-UiO-66 | Sonication | Smooth film with a regular, octahedron-like shape | Large specific surface area, high active sites, and high electrical conductivity. | [ |
| Gr | ZnO | Potentiostatic electrodeposition | Smooth film with a microcluster structure | Good electro-catalytic properties and conductivity. | [ |
Figure 2(A,B) SEM images of ZnO nanorods and Gr-ZnO nanocomposites, respectively. Adapted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier. (C,D) TEM images of NH2–UiO-66 and NH2–UiO-66/RGO, respectively. Adapted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2019 ACS.
CNM-based electrochemical sensor for antibiotics.
| Atibiotics | Detection Principle | Electrode | Linear Range | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET |
| Ta2O5/ErGO/GCE | 0.2–10 µM | 0.095 µM | [ |
| L-Cys/GR/GCE | 8.0–140 µM | 0.12 µM | [ | ||
| p-Mel@ErGO/GCE | 5–225 µM | 2.2 µM | [ | ||
| ErGO/SPE | 20–80 µM | 12 µM | [ | ||
| c-MWCNTs/GO/CPE | 0.02–310 µM | 0.36 µM | [ | ||
| Amoxicillin |
| Au NPs/en-MWCNTs/SPE | 0.2–10 and 10–30 µM | 0.015 µM | [ |
| Au NPs/Pd NPs/ErGO/GCE | 0–350 µM | 9 µM | [ | ||
| FeCr2O4/MWCNTs/GCE | 0.1–10.0 and 10.0–70.0 µM | 0.05 µM | [ | ||
| Au NPs/Gr/Laccase/GCE | 0.425–292 µM | 425 nM | [ | ||
| MWCNTs/GCE | 0.6–8.0 and 10.0–80.0 mM | 0.2 µM | [ | ||
| Ciprofloxacin |
| β-CD/MWCNT/GCE | 10–80 µM | 50 nM | [ |
| NiO NPs-GO/GCE | 0.04–0.97 µM | 6 nM | [ | ||
| NH2-UiO-66/RGO/GCE | 0.02–1 µM | 6.67 nM | [ | ||
| Porous-Nafion-MWCNT/BDD | 0.005–10 µM | 5 nM | [ | ||
| Levofloxacin |
| Poly (L-Cysteine)/Au NPs/rGO | 0.001–100 nM | 3 pM | [ |
| GO/IL/CPE | 7–700 nM | 0.28 nM | [ | ||
| Ag/AgVO3/N-rGO | 0.09–670 μM | 7.92 pM | [ | ||
| Nitrofurantoin |
| NiFe2O4/rGO/GCE | 0.1–10.0 | 0.05 μM | [ |
| rGO/GCE | 0.001–2.0 μM | 0.3 nM | [ | ||
| NiFe/f-MWCNT/SPCE | 0.1–24.8 µM | 0.03 µM | [ |
Figure 3(A) Mechanism for the electrochemical oxidation of TET. (B) Adsorptive transfer stripping differential pulse voltammograms corresponding to different mixtures of tetracyclines using ErGO. The black, red, and blue lines are different concentrations of the TET antibiotic mixture. Adapted with permission from Ref. [62].
Figure 4(A) Mechanism for the electrochemical oxidation of amoxicillin; (B) Square-wave voltammograms recorded for amoxicillin of different concentrations using AuNP-PdNP-ErGO/GCE. Reprinted with permission from. Adapted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2017 Elsevier.
Figure 5Mechanism for the electrochemical levoxidation of ciprofloxacin (A) and ofloxacin (C). (B) DPV curves of 50 µM ciprofloxacin on BDD, Nafion/BDD, porous-Nafion/BDD, Nafion-MWCNT/BDD, and porous-Nafion-MWCNT/BDD electrodes in 0.1 M KH2PO4 solution (pH = 4.50). Adapted with permission from Ref. [67]. Copyright 2016 ACS. (D) DPV response was obtained for Ag/AgVO3/N-rGO/SPCE by linear addition of levofloxacin in the N2 environment. Adapted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2021 ACS.
Figure 6Mechanism for the electrochemical oxidation of nitrofurans.
CNMs-based aptasensors for antibiotics.
| Antibiotics | Aptamer Sequence | Electrode | Linear Range | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TET | 5′-NH2-(CH2)-CGTACGGAATTCGCTAGCCCCCCGGCAGGCCACGGCTTGGGTTGGTCCCACTGCGCGTGGATCCGAGCTCCACGTG-3′ | Apt/MWCNTs/ | 10 nM–50 µM | 5 nM | [ |
| OTET | 5′-SH-GGAATTCGCTAGCACGTTGACGCTGGTGCCCGGTTGTGGTGCGAGTGTTGTGTGGATCCGAGCTCCACGTG-3′ | cMWCNTs/Au NPs/cDNA/Apt/ | 1 × 10−13–1 × 10−5 g/mL | 3.1 × 10−14 g/mL | [ |
| 5′-NH2-CGTACGGAATTCGCTAGCCCCCCGGCAGGCCACGGCTTGGGTTGGTCCCACTGCGCGTGGATCCGAGCTCCACGTG-3′ | Apt/GO/GCE | 0.1 pM–10 µM | 29 fM | [ | |
| 5′-SH-CGACGCACAGTCGCTGGTGCGTACCTGGTTGCCGTTGTGT-3′ | Apt/Au NPs/ | 5 × 10−10–2×10−3 g/L | 4.98 × 10−10 g/L | [ | |
| Kanamycin | 5′-NH2-(CH2)6-TGGGGGTTGAGGCTAAGCCGAC-3′ | Apt/Au NP/ | 1 pM–0.1 nM and | 0.28 pM | [ |
| Streptomycin | 5′-NH2-(CH2)6-TAGGGAATTCGTCGACGGATCCGGGGTCTGGTGTTCTGCTTTGTTCTGTCGGGTCGTCTGCAGGTCGACGCATGCGCCG-3′ | Apt/CNT/Chi/Pd NPs/GCE | 0.1–1500 nM | 18 pM | [ |
| 5′-NH2 -AGATGGGGGTTGAGGCTAAGCCGA-3′ | Apt/HNP-PtCu/Gr-Thionine/GCE | 5 × 10−7–5 × 10−2 μg/mL | 0.42 pg/mL | [ | |
| Chloramphenicol | 5′-NH2 -ACTTCAGAGAGTTGTCCCACGGTCGGCGAGTCGGTGGTAG-3′ | Apt/Ag NPs/ | 10 pM–0.2 µM | 3.3 pM | [ |
Figure 7Schematic illustration of fabrication process for the DNA biosensor. Adapted with permission from Ref. [80]. Copyright 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.