| Literature DB >> 36014636 |
Dienifer F L Horsth1,2, Julia de O Primo1,2, Nayara Balaba1, Jamille S Correa1, Cristina M Zanette3, Douglas K Silva1, Carla Bittencourt2, Fauze J Anaissi1.
Abstract
We report on the synthesis of boehmite aluminum oxide hydroxide particles with lamellar structure (γ-AlO(OH)) obtained from the recycling of metallic can seals, with the addition of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) reduced by Aloe Vera extract. X-ray diffractometry (XRD) confirmed the γ-phase, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the presence of Ag-NPs on the boehmite particle surface, confirming the efficiency of the synthesis to obtain the composite material. The samples were used to treat lake water, according to the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. The results indicated that the elimination of total coliforms and Escherichia coli occurred, with excellent efficiency for the Ag-boehmite sample. The tests show the possibility of reuse (5×) of the sample, as it maintained the efficiency of disinfection for E. coli. The preparation, use, and reuse of boehmite obtained from metallic waste is a case of a circular economy, focused on sustainability and green chemistry.Entities:
Keywords: aluminum; circular economy; green synthesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014636 PMCID: PMC9415003 DOI: 10.3390/nano12162771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the synthesis route used to obtain the boehmite (γ-AlO(OH)).
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the synthesis route used to obtain Ag-boehmite (Ag-(γ-AlO(OH))).
Figure 3Schematic diagram used for lake water treatment.
Methods used in the analysis of the treated water and the main parameters evaluated.
| Parameter Analyzed | Method |
|---|---|
|
| SMEWW 9223 B- Enzymatic Substrate Coliform Test |
|
| SMEWW 9223 B |
|
| SMEWW4500H + B—Electrometric Method |
|
| SMEWW 2130 B—Nephelometric Method |
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy images of samples: (a) boehmite (LA detector), (b) boehmite (SE detector) (c) Ag-Boehmite (LA detector), (d) Ag-Boehmite (SE detector), (e) Ag-Boehmite (LA detector), the image is the magnification of the region inside the yellow rectangle in image (c), the bight nanostructures are Ag nanoparticles, and (f) histogram of Ag particle size distribution, the diameter of the Ag particles was measured on image (e).
Figure 5X-ray diffractograms of the samples: (a) boehmite; (b) Ag-NPs, and (c) Ag-Boehmite. The samples in powder form were placed directly in an appropriate sample holder for XRD analysis, scanning with an increment of 0.07°/s between 10° and 80° 2 theta.
Chemical composition of the samples according to EDS characterization.
| Sample | % Weight | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | Al | O | Cl | Ag | |
| Boehmite | 2.8 | 37.4 | 53.5 | 6.3 | - |
| Ag-Boehmite | 1.5 | 57.1 | 33.2 | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Crystallinity parameters (percentage and size) calculated from XRD.
| Sample | Crystallinity (%) | Crystallite Size (nm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| k = 0.9 | k = 1.3 | ||
| Boehmite | 60.4 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Ag-NPs | 17.9 | 21.2 | 30.7 |
| Ag-Boehmite | 80.0 | 36.3 | 52.4 |
Microbiological and physicochemical analysis of the water before and after treatment.
| Sample | Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Coliforms | pH | Turbidity | ||
| Lake Water (100 mL) | >2419.6 | 195.6 | 6.3 | 13.0 |
| 1st use Boehmite | 547.5 | 26.2 | 5.1 | 0.7 |
| reuse Boehmite | Presence | Presence | 5.5 | 5.6 |
| 2nd reuse | Presence | Presence | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| 3rd reuse | Presence | Presence | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| 4th reuse | Presence | Presence | 6.0 | 5.6 |
| 1st use Ag-Boehmite | <1 | <1 | 6.0 | 4.8 |
| reuse Ag-Boehmite | Presence | <1 | 6.1 | 5.8 |
| 2nd reuse | Presence | <1 | 6.1 | 5.9 |
| 3rd reuse | Presence | <1 | 6.1 | 5.2 |
| 4th reuse | Presence | <1 | 6.2 | 5.5 |
Figure 6Digital photograph of flasks containing water treated with: (a) boehmite; and (b) Ag-Boehmite. First (left) flask not treated water, last flask water after 4th treatement.
Aluminum and silver concentration (ppm) in water after treatment.
| Sample | Concentration (ppm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Al | Ag | |
| Contaminated water | 0.371 ± 0.0028 | −0.031 ± 0.0025 |
| Boehmite | 3.299 ± 0.0138 | −0.025 ± 0.0019 |
| Boehmite-Ag | 0.082 ± 0.0012 | −0.014 ± 0.0048 |
Colorimetric parameters of samples before and after water treatment.
| Sample | Colorimetric Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | C | ∆E | |
| Boehmite | 89.40 | 1.94 | 5.00 | 5.37 | 6.54 |
| Boehmite (after) | 85.94 | 4.12 | 10.10 | 10.91 | |
| Ag-boehmite | 63.28 | 4.28 | 8.58 | 9.51 | 14.26 |
| Ag-boehmite (after) | 49.18 | 3.70 | 10.63 | 11.26 | |
Figure 7Graph of colorimetric parameters +a* (yellow) vs. +b* (red). Colorimetric measurements (L*a*b*) were performed on the respective samples in the form of powder.