| Literature DB >> 36014575 |
Sandra N Jimenez-Garcia1, Lina Garcia-Mier2, Xóchitl S Ramirez-Gomez1, Humberto Aguirre-Becerra3, Alexandro Escobar-Ortiz4, Luis M Contreras-Medina3, Juan F Garcia-Trejo3, Ana A Feregrino-Perez3.
Abstract
Hylocereus spp. present two varieties of commercial interest due to their color, organoleptic characteristics, and nutritional contribution, such as Hylocerous polyrhizus and Selenicerus undatus. The fruit recognized as dragon fruit or Pitahaya is an exotic fruit whose pulp is consumed, while the peel is discarded during the process. Studies indicate that the pulp has vitamin C and betalains, and seeds are rich in essential fatty acids, compounds that can contribute to the prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases (cancer, hypertension, and diabetes). In the present study, polyphenolic compounds, biological activity, and fatty acids present in the peel of the two varieties of pitahaya peel were evaluated, showing as a result that the variety S. undatus had higher antioxidant activity with 51% related to the presence of flavonoids 357 mgRE/g sample and fatty acids (hexadecanoic acid and linoleate) with 0.310 and 0.248 mg AG/g sample, respectively. On the other hand, H. polyrhizuun showed a significant difference in the inhibitory activity of amylase and glucosidase enzymes with 68% and 67%, respectively. We conclude that pitahaya peel has potential health effects and demonstrate that methylated fatty acids could be precursors to betalain formation, as well as showing effects against senescence and as a biological control against insects; in the same way, the peel can be reused as a by-product for the extraction of important enzymes in the pharmaceutical and food industry.Entities:
Keywords: Hylocerous spp.; biological activity; phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014575 PMCID: PMC9415145 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Phenolic compounds content in methanol extracts in Selenicerus undatus and Hylocereus polyrhizus.
| Peels | Phenolic mg GAE/g Sample | Flavonoids mg RE/g Sample | Tannins mg CE/g Sample | Total Phenolicmg /g Sample | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | F | ||||||||||||||
|
| 2.717 ± 0.0319 a | 1.492 | 0.706 | 356.74 ± 0.0216 a | 0.471 | 0.000 | 2.886 ± 0.001 a | 4.046 | 0.000 | 362. 568 ± 0.026 a | ||||||
|
| 1.863 ± 0.0053 b | 352.09 ± 0.0455 a | 1.628 ± 0.002 b | 355..033 ± 0.038 b | ||||||||||||
mg GAE/g sample (mg Gallic acid equivalents/ g sample), mg RE/g sample (rutine equivalents/g sample), mg CE/g sample (mg catechin equivalents/g sample). The average represents the value of 3 repetitions. * Comparison between means (T Student α ≤ 0.05). Means with different letters in the same column are statistically different.
Figure 1Chromatogram of pitahaya samples. (A) Chromatogram of pitahaya Selenicerus undatus. (B) Chromatogram of pitahaya Hylocereus polyrhizus.
Figure 2Identification of Gas-chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis in Selenicerus undatus and Hylocereus polyrhizus. The average represents the value of 3 repetitions.
Retention times and areas measured by the team, FAMEs in two varieties of pitahaya Selenicerus undatus and Hylocereus polyrhizus. TR(retention time). In the spaces where a hyphen was placed is an unidentified element.
| Peak | TR | Compound Name | Area% | % Similarity to Library | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 9.27 | 8.750 | 9-Octadecenamide | Heneicosane | 1.30 | 5.85 | 43 | 87 |
| 2 | 9.78 | 9.26 | Ethanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | Nonadecane | 0.58 | 6.56 | 80 | 91 |
| 3 | 11.615 | 11.615 | Undecanoic acid, methyl ester | Undecanoic acid, methyl ester | 5.51 | 5.51 | 92 | 92 |
| 4 | 13.94 | 13.25 | - | Methyl tretadecanoate | - | 1.28 | - | 95 |
| 5 | 15.35 | 15.388 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 51.29 | 10.38 | 98 | 97 |
| 6 | 16.04 | 16.04 | 3-Acetoxy-3-hydroxypropionic acid, methyl ester | Dimethyl dl-malate | 0.40 | 0.41 | 72 | 83 |
| 7 | 19.88 | 18.98 | 3-Hexadecanol | Eicosane | 0.70 | 15.01 | 35 | 87 |
| 8 | 20.78 | 20.82 | Methyl linoleate | Methyl linoleate | 32.08 | 6.20 | 99 | 99 |
| 9 | 23.84 | 22.94 | Decanamide | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester | 0.65 | 2.15 | 53 | 98 |
| 10 | 34.35 | 34.78 | 9-Octadecenamide | Hexadecanamide | 62.35 | 5.09 | 96 | 81 |
Antioxidant capability in methanol extracts of peels in Selenicerus undatus and Hylocereus polyrhizus.
| Peels | DPPH% | ABTS% | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | |||||||||||
|
| 23.81 ± 0.46 a | 23.84 | 0.000 | 51.22 ± 0.171 a | 71.79 | 0.000 | ||||||
|
| 24.88 ± 0.29 a | 50.92 ± 0.421 a | ||||||||||
The average represents the value of 3 repetitions. * Comparison between means (T Student α ≤ 0.05). Means with equal letters in the same column are not statistically different.
Biological activity of secondary metabolites in methanol extracts in melissa, peppermint, thyme, and mint.
| Peels | α-Amylase% | α-Glucosidase% | ACE% | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | F | ||||||||||||||||
|
| 57.95 ± 6.39 a | 10.137 | 0.000 | 55.08 ± 1.39 a | 4.596 | 0.000 | 91.5895 ± 0.65 a | 33.107 | 0.000 | |||||||||
|
| 67.78 ± 6.06 b | 69.60 ± 1.02 b | 97.9571 ± 7.44 a | |||||||||||||||
The average represents the value of 3 repetitions. * Comparison between means (T Student α ≤ 0.05). Means with equal letters in the same column are not statistically different.