| Literature DB >> 36014483 |
Daniil N Lyapustin1, Svetlana K Kotovskaya1, Ilya I Butorin1, Evgeny N Ulomsky1, Vladimir L Rusinov1, Denis A Babkov2, Alexander A Pokhlebin2, Alexander A Spasov2, Vsevolod V Melekhin1,3, Maria D Tokhtueva1, Anna V Shcheglova1,3, Oleg G Makeev3.
Abstract
Today, cancer is one of the most widespread and dangerous human diseases with a high mortality rate. Nevertheless, the search and application of new low-toxic and effective drugs, combined with the timely diagnosis of diseases, makes it possible to cure most types of tumors at an early stage. In this work, the range of new polysubstituted 4,7-dihydro-6-nitroazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines was extended. The structure of all the obtained compounds was confirmed by the data of 1H, 13C NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. These compounds were evaluated against human recombinant CK2 using the ADP-GloTM assay. In addition, the IC50 parameters were calculated based on the results of the MTT test against glioblastoma (A-172), embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma (Rd), osteosarcoma (Hos), and human embryonic kidney (Hek-293) cells. Compounds 5f, 5h, and 5k showed a CK2 inhibitory activity close to the reference molecule (staurosporine). The most potential compound in the MTT test was 5m with an IC50 from 13 to 27 µM. Thus, our results demonstrate that 4,7-dihydro-6-nitroazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines are promising for further investigation of their antitumor properties.Entities:
Keywords: Azolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines; CK2 inhibition; antitumor activity; multicomponent reaction; nitro compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014483 PMCID: PMC9415015 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Most significant ATP-competitive CK2 inhibitors: A [19], B [20], C [21], D [18].
Figure 2Azolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines exhibiting antitumor activity: E [22,23,24,25], F [30], G [26], H [27].
Scheme 1Preparation of 4,7-dihydro-6-nitroazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines 5,6.
Screening of the target compounds against CK2 activity.
| Compound | CK2 Inhibition at 50 μM, m ± SD (%) | Compound | CK2 Inhibition at 50 μM, m ± SD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| n.a. |
| 66.81 ± 7.97 ** |
|
| n.a. |
| 48.35 ± 4.48 * |
|
| n.a. |
| n.a. |
|
| n.a. |
| 19.80 ± 24.53 |
|
| n.a. |
| n.a. |
|
| 53.81 ± 0.42 |
| n.a. |
|
| n.a. |
| n.a. |
|
| 54.80 ± 0.87 |
| n.a. |
|
| 3.66 ± 37.60 |
| n.a. |
|
| n.a. |
| 39.82 ± 19.52 |
| Staurosporine | 72.34 ± 6.39 ** | ||
n.a.-not active; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01-significance vs. DMSO-control. Kruskal–Wallis test.
Inhibition of CK2 by the most active compounds.
| Compound | CK2 IC50, μM | 95% C.I., μM | Hill Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 52.83 | 39.12–59.08 | −1.369 |
|
| 59.47 | 32.99–66.81 | −1.566 |
|
| 52.26 | 30.10–105.80 | −1.183 |
|
| 57.20 | 57.14–57.26 | −2.947 |
|
| >100 | - | - |
| Staurosporine | 69.85 | 50.96–98.39 | −0.974 |
Cytotoxicity index (IC50 ± SE) of 4,7-dihydro-6-nitroazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines on glioblastoma (A-172), embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma (Rd), osteosarcoma (Hos), and human embryonic kidney (Hek-293) cells, µM.
| Compound | IC50, µM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cells | ||||
| A-172 | Rd | Hos | Hek-293 | |
|
| 28.91 ± 4.58 | 105.54 ± 16.81 | 103.53 ± 18.27 | 543.74 ± 70.79 |
|
| 256.72 ± 12.20 | 99.46 ± 4.43 | 126.60 ± 7.17 | 222.84 ± 6.33 |
|
| 212.36 ± 42.85 | 121.97 ± 13.53 | 170.14 ± 11.16 | 35.86 ± 4.30 |
|
| 171.74 ± 8.63 | 149.72 ± 11.01 | 181.14 ± 7.47 | 483.09 ± 37.61 |
|
| 323.41 ± 22.70 | 378.59 ± 20.39 | 234.97 ± 25.80 | 153.47 ± 12.35 |
|
| 145.19 ± 8.96 | 105.10 ± 10.70 | 88.44 ± 5.85 | 69.52 ± 8.69 |
|
| 566.09 ± 17.12 | 673.44 ± 20.70 | 522.38 ± 16.16 | 581.39 ± 43.90 |
|
| 110.23 ± 2.97 | 89.43 ± 10.46 | 77.32 ± 3.06 | 107.57 ± 11.10 |
|
| 77.79 ± 4.02 | 124.66 ± 6.80 | 92.91 ± 3.91 | 162.30 ± 9.95 |
|
| 13.36 ± 0.98 | 27.52 ± 2.77 | 18.54 ± 1.79 | 211.7 ± 10.77 |
|
| 119.75 ± 8.49 | 151.44 ± 7.28 | 112.26 ± 8.19 | 78.70 ± 9.75 |
|
| 22.49 ± 2.93 | 36.33 ± 3.40 | 28.09 ± 3.91 | 169.30 ± 10.88 |
|
| 434.08 ± 18.02 | 448.21 ± 22.53 | 542.85 ± 21.45 | 1131.79 ± 77.86 |
|
| 71.03 ± 2.07 | 110.11 ± 4.93 | 92.03 ± 3.08 | 237.40 ± 11.99 |
|
| 41.27 ± 4.10 | 71.15 ± 6.84 | 40.88 ± 4.11 | 227.50 ± 25.20 |
|
| 27.49 ± 1.67 | 37.28 ± 3.77 | 23.31 ± 1.84 | 50.07 ± 4.43 |
|
| 82.44 ± 2.22 | 192.69 ± 10.27 | 93.72 ± 5.89 | 54.16 ± 5.32 |
|
| 3.64 ± 0.21 | 4.99 ± 0.31 | 2.36 ± 0.12 | 4.41 ± 0.24 |
Figure 3Cytotoxicity index IC50 ± SE for compounds 5m, 5o, 6c, 6d, and cPt in comparison.
Figure 4Comparison of the selectivity ratio (normal/cancer cell).