| Literature DB >> 36014462 |
Jiangtao Huang1,2,3, Aiyun Meng1,3, Zongyan Zhang1,3, Guanjie Ma1,3, Yuhao Long1,3, Xingyu Li1,3, Peigang Han1,3, Bin He1,3.
Abstract
Constructing heterojunction is an attractive strategy for promoting photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance in water splitting and organic pollutant degradation. Herein, a novel porous BiVO4/Boron-doped Diamond (BiVO4/BDD) heterojunction photoanode containing masses of ultra-micro electrodes was successfully fabricated with an n-type BiVO4 film coated on a p-type BDD substrate by magnetron sputtering (MS). The surface structures of BiVO4 could be adjusted by changing the duration of deposition (Td). The morphologies, phase structures, electronic structures, and chemical compositions of the photoanodes were systematically characterized and analyzed. The best PEC activity with the highest current density of 1.8 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE was achieved when Td was 30 min, and the sample showed the highest degradation efficiency towards tetracycline hydrochloride degradation (TCH) as well. The enhanced PEC performance was ascribed to the excellent charge transport efficiency as well as a lower carrier recombination rate, which benefited from the formation of BiVO4/BDD ultra-micro p-n heterojunction photoelectrodes and the porous structures of BiVO4. These novel photoanodes were expected to be employed in the practical PEC applications of energy regeneration and environmental management in the future.Entities:
Keywords: bismuth vanadate (BiVO4); boron-doped diamond (BDD); p-n heterojunction; photoelectrochemical (PEC); tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) degradation; water splitting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014462 PMCID: PMC9415291 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1SEM images (top view) and enlarged SEM images (inset) of the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanodes for the (a) M15 and (b) M30; (c) SEM image (cross-sectional view) the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanode for the M30; Elemental mapping (top view) the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanodes for the (d) M15, (e) M45, and (f) M75; (g) Elemental mapping (cross-sectional view) the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanode for the M45; (h) HRTEM image and (i) elemental mapping (enlarged cross-sectional view) of the M30.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns, (b) Raman spectra, XPS spectra of (c) O 1s, (d) Bi 4f, and (e) V 2p for the M30 BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanode.
Figure 3(a) The UV-VIS absorbance curves and (b) Tauc plots of the BiVO4 films with different Td; (c) UPS spectra for the BiVO4 film and the BDD film; (d) Energy band positions of the BiVO4 and the BDD in reference to vacuum level and NHE.
Figure 4(a) The Mott-Schottky plots for the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanodes and (inset) the BDD; (b) The current-voltage curve of the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanode and (inset) the schematic diagram of the corresponding illustration.
Figure 5(a) Linear sweep voltammogram (LSVs) for the M15-M75 measured in 0.1 M Na2SO4 under AM 1.5 irradiation and in the dark; (b) Variation of the current densities of the M30 and M60 under AM 1.5 irradiation at 1.1 VRHE and 1.6 VRHE; (c) The calculated ηtransport and (d) ηtransfer of the M15-M60.
Figure 6(a) EIS Nyquist plots and (b) CV curves for the M15-M60; (c) TCH degradation and (inset) kinetic curves of TCH degradation for the M15-M60; (d) TCH degradation for the M30 with different scavengers.
Comparative PEC degradation results of BiVO4-based and BDD-based heterojunction photoanodes in recent years.
| Photoanodes | Experimental Conditions | Degradation Activity | Years and Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2/BDD | Glyphosate (50 mg/L); UVC light lamp (9 W and λ = 254 nm); | Removal: 99.5% | 2021 [ |
| SnO2/Mo: BiVO4 | TCH (5 mg/L); AM 1.5 G; 1.23 VRHE. | Removal: 82.1% | 2022 [ |
| F-BiVO4@NiFe-LDH | TCH (20 mg/L); Simulated solar light (100 mW cm−2); 0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl. | Removal: 86% | 2020 [ |
| Patterned TiO2/BDD | MO (50 mg/L); Simulated solar light (100 mW cm−2); 2.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl. | Removal: 100% (4 h). | 2020 [ |
| BiVO4/Ag/Cu2O | RhB (5 mg/L); AM 1.5 G; 1.2 VRHE. | Removal: 86% | 2022 [ |
| WO3/BiVO4 | RhB (5 mg/L); Visible-light; 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl. | Removal: 93% | 2020 [ |
| Coral-like WO3/BiVO4 photoanode | Sulfamethoxazole (20 mg/L); AM 1.5 G; 1.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl. | Removal: 82.1% | 2022 [ |
| Porous BiVO4/BDD | TCH (20 mg/L); AM 1.5; 1.0 VRHE. | Removal: 45.1% | This work |
Figure 7Schematic illustration of the band diagram and PEC degradation occurring at the BiVO4/BDD heterojunction photoanode under a forward bias and light irradiation.