| Literature DB >> 36014434 |
Xin Liu1,2, Lijuan Feng1, Yongpeng Li3, Tian Xia2, Zhuyin Sui3, Qi Chen2.
Abstract
Novel covalent organic framework (COF) composites containing a bipyridine multimetal complex were designed and obtained via the coordination interaction between bipyridine groups and metal ions. The obtained Pt and polyoxometalate (POM)-loaded COF complex (POM-Pt@COF-TB) exhibited excellent oxidation of methane. In addition, the resultant Co/Fe-based COF composites achieved great performance in an electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Compared with Co-modified COFs (Co@COF-TB), the optimized bimetallic modified COF composites (Co0.75Fe0.25@COF-TB) exhibited great performance for electrocatalytic OER activity, showing a lower overpotential of 331 mV at 10 mA cm-2. Meanwhile, Co0.75Fe0.25@COF-TB also possessed a great turnover frequency (TOF) value (0.119 s-1) at the overpotential of 330 mV, which exhibited high efficiency in the utilization of metal atoms and was better than that of many reported COF-based OER electrocatalysts. This work provides a new perspective for the future coordination of COFs with bimetallic or polymetallic ions, and broadens the application of COFs in methane conversion and electrocatalytic oxygen evolution.Entities:
Keywords: covalent organic frameworks; electrocatalyst; methane; multimetal; oxygen evolution reaction
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014434 PMCID: PMC9416349 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27165193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Scheme 1Synthesis route of metal COF composites.
Figure 1(a) Powder X–ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of prepared COFs; XPS spectra of POM–Pt@COF–TB: (b) full elements; (c) Pt; (d) v; (e) Mo, (f) P; (g) EDS mapping images of POM–Pt@COF–TB.
Figure 2(a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of prepared COFs; (b) pore size distribution calculated with the NLDFT method.
Porosity data of prepared porous materials.
| COFs | SBET (m2 g−1) a | SL (m2 g−1) b | Vtotal (cm3 g−1) c | Dpore (nm) d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COF–TB | 1216 | 1263 | 1.002 | 2.13 |
| Pt@COF–TB | 965 | 1207 | 0.8008 | 2.05 |
| POM–Pt@COF–TB | 738 | 892 | 0.6408 | 1.84 |
| Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB | 319 | 369 | 0.5138 | 1.39 |
a Specific surface area calculated by the BET method; b specific surface area calculated via the Langmuir method; c total pore volume at P/P0 = 0.99; d data calculated with the NLDFT method.
Figure 3(a) XPS spectra of Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB; N 1s spectra of COF–TB (b) and Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB (c); Co 2p spectra (d) and Fe 2p spectra (e) of Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB; (f) EDS mapping images of Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB.
Figure 4(a) LSV curves toward OER of COF–TB, CoxFe1–x@COF–TB (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1); (b) Tafel slopes of the prepared materials; (c) Nyquist plots of CoxFe1–x@COF–TB (x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1); (d) LSV curves for Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB before and after 100 and 1000 cycles of CV scans; (e) CV plots of Co0.75Fe0.25@COF–TB tested at various scan rates from 10 to 90 mV s−1; (f) ECSA evaluation.