| Literature DB >> 36014225 |
Tao-Qian Tang1,2,3,4,5, Muhammad Rooman6, Narcisa Vrinceanu7, Zahir Shah6, Ahmed Alshehri8.
Abstract
Nanofluids are extremely useful to investigators due to their greater heat transfer rates, which have significant applications in multiple industries. The primary objective of this article is to look into the effect of viscous dissipation in Sisko nano liquid flow with gold Au nanoparticles on a porous stenosis artery. Heat transfer properties were explored. Blood was utilized as a base fluid for nanoparticles. To renovate the governing nonlinear PDEs into nonlinear ODEs, appropriate transformations were used. The bvp4c-based shooting method, via MATLAB, was used to determine the numerical results of the nonlinear ODEs. Furthermore, flow forecasts for each physical quantity were explored. To demonstrate the physical influences of flow constraints versus presumed flow fields, physical explanations were used. The findings demonstrated that the velocity contour improved as the volume fraction, curvature, power law index, and material parameter upsurged. For the Prandtl number, the volume fraction of nanoparticles, the index of the power law, and the temperature profile of the nanofluid declined. Furthermore, the drag force and transfer of the heat were also investigated as explanations for influences on blood flow. Further, the Nusselt number reduced and the drag force enhanced as the curvature parameter values increased. The modeling and numerical solutions play an impressive role in predicting the cause of atherosclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: Sisko fluid; blood flow; gold nanoparticles; nanofluid; porous medium; stenosis arteries; viscous dissipation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36014225 PMCID: PMC9415983 DOI: 10.3390/mi13081303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 3.523
Base fluid (blood) and nanoparticle experimental values [10].
| Material | Symbol |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| -- | 1050 | 3617 | 0.52 |
|
|
| 19,300 | 129 | 318 |
Figure 1Geometry of the problem.
Figure 2Modification of versus .
Figure 3Modification of versus .
Figure 4Modification of versus .
Figure 5Modification of versus .
Figure 6Modification of versus .
Figure 7Modification of versus .
Figure 8Modification of versus .
Figure 9Modification of versus .
Figure 10Modification of versus .
Figure 11Modification of versus .
Skin friction coefficient variations for various parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | −1.053197 |
| 0.05 | −1.094823 | |||
| 0.1 | −1.155339 | |||
| 0.01 | 0.1 | −1.053197 | ||
| 0.3 | −1.16986 | |||
| 0.5 | −1.278185 | |||
| 0.1 | 0.1 | −1.053197 | ||
| 0.2 | −0.9924828 | |||
| 0.3 | −0.9448766 | |||
| 0.1 | 0.1 | −1.053197 | ||
| 0.3 | −1.138746 | |||
| 0.5 | −1.218283 |
Nusselt number variations for various parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 3.928399 |
| 0.05 | 7.487721 | ||
| 0.1 | 10.59055 | ||
| 0.01 | 0.1 | 3.928399 | |
| 0.2 | 3.744353 | ||
| 0.3 | 3.573028 | ||
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 3.928399 | |
| 0.2 | 3.183704 | ||
| 0.3 | 2.43899 |
Comparisons with a previous study, when .
|
|
| Present Paper | L. Sarwar and A. Hussain [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | −0.93947 | −0.939968 |
| 0.12 | −0.9295648 | −0.924794 | |
| 0.14 | −0.9180573 | −0.911311 | |
| 0.1 | 0.0 | −0.93947 | −0.939968 |
| 0.05 | −1.323752 | −1.329552 | |
| 0.1 | −1.714007 | −1.715985 |