| Literature DB >> 36013697 |
Abstract
With the development of fiber optical technologies, fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors are frequently utilized in structural health monitoring due to their considerable advantages, including fast response, electrical passivity, corrosion resistance, multi-point sensing capability and low-cost production, as well as high accuracy and resolution over a long period. These characteristics allow FBG to be a proper alternative sensing element for displacement measurements. In this article, the recent sensing advances and principles of detection of FBG-based displacement sensors are illustrated. Specifically, the latest FBG-based displacement technologies are examined from three principles of detection, i.e., wavelength, intensity and phase signal demodulation. Regarding wavelength detection methods, the problem related to the cross-sensitivity can significantly be reduced depending on the new type of cantilever-FBG-based sensing developed. Vice versa, only the packaging method of FBG prestressed between two fixed ends can still avoid the chirp phenomenon in the reflection spectrum. Moreover, to attenuate the influence of temperature variations on the accuracy of FBG displacement sensors, specific temperature self-compensation structures were successfully designed according to the concepts of phase signal demodulation. In future investigations, different elastic structures and gratings manufactured through special fibers and new methodologies for temperature compensation will still highly refine the efficiency of FBG-based displacement sensors.Entities:
Keywords: Bragg wavelength; displacement sensor; fiber Bragg grating (FBG); information detection; monitoring; optical fiber; structure design
Year: 2022 PMID: 36013697 PMCID: PMC9414369 DOI: 10.3390/ma15165561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Spectral response for a definite grating period and shifting of Bragg wavelength λ of an FBG subjected to axial loading and temperature. Each of a series of FBG sensors (e.g., sensor a, b, c, …) can occupy a certain broadband light (e.g., λa, λb, λc, …). λ: Bragg wavelength shift.
Figure 2FBG-based displacement sensors according to wavelength shift demodulation: (a) Schematic of a proposed cantilever-based sensor. The positions of the two FBGs, at distance Ls between each other, are shown along with the effective cantilever length L; (b) mechanism of a proposed two-fixed-ends-based sensor. Heat-shrink tubes at both ends of an FBG that exert an external tensile force F on the FBG (top). Variation in the external tensile force ΔF with variations in the central wavelength ΔλB (bottom).
Applications and performances for FBG-based displacement sensors according to wavelength shift demodulation (Section 3).
| Reference | Method of Wavelength Demodulation | Technique | Packaging | Application | Range (mm) | Sensitivity (pm/mm) | Resolution (mm) | Accuracy (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen et al. [ | Cantilever beam structure | Hydraulic telescopic cylinder linked to a cantilever | FBG formed by a single-mode fiber and photosensitive fiber | Displacements in industrial environments | 0~45 | 36.00 | — | — |
| Guo et al. [ | Cantilever beam structure | Slider combined with a cantilever | Bending strain of cantilever sensed by FBG | Micro-displacements monitoring | 0~100 | 20.11 | — | — |
| Nazeer et al. [ | Cantilever beam structure | Interferometry and FBG sensing | FBG sensing along the cantilever | Any beam of any material | 0~20 | — | — | ±1 |
| Li et al. [ | Cantilever beam structure | Wedge cavity sensing structure | — | Displacements of civil structures | 0~50 | 5.58 | — | — |
| Lyu et al. [ | Cantilever beam structure | — | — | Displacements of high-speed railway bridges | 0~200 | 4.53 | — | — |
| Hong et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | Anchorage plate and PVC tube | FBG sealed with PVC tube | Soil strain monitoring | 0~0.9 | — | 0.0747 | — |
| Bonopera et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | Hydrostatic system of communicating vessels | FBG encapsulated in vessels | Long-span bridge displacements | 0~180 | — | 0.01 | — |
| Li et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | T-shaped cantilever and slider | Prestressed FBG bonded from ends | Sub-micrometer displacements of micro-systems | 1~2 | 2086.27 | 0.00048 | — |
| Xiong et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | Two FBGs prestressed on two cylindrical rods | Prestressed FBG bonded from ends | Crack monitoring | 0~2 | 3304.70 | 3.03 × 10−5 | 0.02 |
| Tian et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | Flexible FBG sensor | Bending deformation of flexible FBG | Displacements of slope profiles | — | — | 0.01 | — |
| Li et al. [ | Structure with two fixed ends | FBG with embedded spring | FBG wavelength shifts | High-precision displacements of civil structures | — | 23.96 | — | — |
| Thomas et al. [ | Other structure | Wire combined with a sensing arm | Two FBGs attached on sensing arm | Displacements in industrial environment | 0~150 | 23.80 | 0.042 | — |
| Wu et al. [ | Other structure | Two FBGs combined with mechanical units | Two FBGs suspended in a tilt parallel mode | Displacements at micro-scale | 0~0.5 | 1518.60 | — | — |
| Li et al. [ | Other structure | FBG combined with mechanical units | FBG attached on thin-walled ring | Displacements of subway floating slabs | 0~20 | 36.36 | — | 0.0825 |
| Chen et al. [ | Other structure | Dowel bar containing four FBGs | FBG strains of four points on dowel bar | Displacements of pavement slabs | 0~1 | — | — | — |
| Kim et al. [ | Other structure | — | — | Detection of load of bridge vehicles | — | — | — | — |
| Alias et al. [ | Other structure | Embedded FBG | Wavelength shifts of embedded FBG | High-precision monitoring of ground movements | — | 1.58 | — | — |
Applications and performances for FBG-based displacement sensors according to optical intensity and phase signal demodulation (Section 4).
| Reference | Method of Signal Demodulation | Technique | Packaging | Application | Range (mm) | Sensitivity | Resolution (mm) | Accuracy (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zou et al. [ | Intensity method | Twin-core optical fiber between two single-mode optical fibers | Intensity variation between two single-mode optical fibers | High-precision displacement monitoring | — | — | — | — |
| Ghaffar et al. [ | Intensity method | Plastic optical fiber with a large and a small diameter | Intensity variation of plastic optical fiber | High-precision displacement monitoring | 0~1.3 | 1.977 nW/μm | 5.058 × 10−5 | — |
| Zhang et al. [ | Phase method | Optical fiber MZI based on slow light in PI-PCW | FBG attached on Omega-like beam | High-precision displacement monitoring | 0~55.6 | 1.035 rad/mm | — | — |
| Tao et al. [ | Phase method | Fabry–Pérot (FP) effect of FBG | Apodized FBG glued on a thin-walled ring | High-precision displacement monitoring | 0~2 | 117 pm/mm | — | 0.085 |
| Zhang et al. [ | Phase method | Wavelength scanning laser with FBG FPI | Scanning of radio frequency signal using two FBGs | Monitoring of micro-displacement with ultrahigh resolution | — | 35.70 MHz/μm | — | — |
| Zhu et al. [ | Phase method | Magnetic scale, as transferring mechanism, combined with two FBGs | Phase variation between two FBGs | Displacement monitoring in research and industry | — | — | — | — |