| Literature DB >> 36013206 |
Yumi Mashimo1, Saki Tsuchihashi2, Kenta Tsutsui3, Tomoyuki Arai4, Yoshitaka Tsuji5, Toshiaki Numai6, Kazuo Kameda6, Kyoko Nishizawa6, Mami Kovacs6, Shukichi Tanaka7, Hiroki Watanabe8, Yasushi Naruse8, Mitsuyo Ohmura9, Noriyuki Ishida10, Toshiki Iwasaki10, Gaku Hiruma10, Naoki Miyazaki10, Ryo Takemura10, Kengo Nagashima10, Yasunori Sato11, Yui Ohtsu12, Takashi Nakano13, Naomi Aida13, Isao Iizuka14, Hiromi Kato14, Yoshiki Kobayashi13, Takaaki Senbonmatsu3,15.
Abstract
Maintaining a social environment that enables going out freely is important for older people and aids the prevention of frailty syndrome. However, losing a driver's license can increase the long-term care needs of older people. Therefore, outing support systems are important. However, the utilization rate of these systems is currently relatively low. We conducted a demonstration experiment among older people aged 70 years and over, living in Iruma City, Saitama Japan, by implementing the Choisoko outing support system developed by Aisin Co., Ltd., in conjunction with an approach for improving motivation. Using this system, elderly people were able to go shopping freely whenever they chose, without a driver's license. Participants in the demonstration experiment exhibited higher Functional Independence Measure scores after the intervention, irrespective of whether or not they used the Choisoko system. The number of uses per person increased over time, and the subjective well-being of Choisoko users improved. However, few male participants engaged with the system. Although improving motivation is important for inducing positive behaviors and enabling the elderly to go out, motivation-improving factors differ between men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Choisoko; elderly people; motivation; subjective well-being
Year: 2022 PMID: 36013206 PMCID: PMC9410321 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Figure 1Eligibility of subject person.
Baseline characteristics.
| Choisoko Group | Non Choisoko Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | N | ||||
| Age | 31 | 82.1 ± 4.7 | 25 | 82.9 ± 4.6 | 0.496 |
| Gender (Female) | 31 | 29 (93.5) | 25 | 19 (76.0) | 0.069 |
| Height | 30 | 149.5 ± 7.0 | 24 | 149.1 ± 7.9 | 0.847 |
| Weight | 30 | 50.1 ± 8.5 | 24 | 49.4 ± 7.5 | 0.756 |
| Alb | 31 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 24 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 0.028 |
| AST | 31 | 26.0 ± 7.5 | 24 | 23.8 ± 6.6 | 0.261 |
| ALT | 31 | 20.0 ± 12.7 | 24 | 18.8 ± 7.8 | 0.667 |
| BUN | 31 | 18.9 ± 5.3 | 24 | 17.2 ± 4.1 | 0.186 |
| CRE | 31 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 24 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.972 |
| eGFR | 31 | 57.5 ± 12.5 | 24 | 59.4 ± 8.9 | 0.510 |
| WBC | 31 | 5819.4 ± 1446.0 | 24 | 6720.8 ± 2203.6 | 0.091 |
| RBC | 31 | 413.2 ± 41.6 | 24 | 408.2 ± 88.3 | 0.799 |
| Hb | 31 | 12.6 ± 1.3 | 24 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 0.285 |
| Ht | 31 | 38.1 ± 3.2 | 24 | 39.2 ± 3.2 | 0.225 |
| MCV | 31 | 92.5 ± 5.2 | 24 | 92.3 ± 4.4 | 0.904 |
| MCH | 31 | 30.7 ± 2.3 | 24 | 30.6 ± 1.7 | 0.928 |
| MCHC | 31 | 33.2 ± 1.1 | 24 | 33.2 ± 0.8 | 0.967 |
| Platelet | 31 | 21.7 ± 4.2 | 24 | 24.3 ± 5.8 | 0.075 |
| Grip strength (right) | 31 | 23.3 ± 4.0 | 25 | 23.2 ± 4.5 | 0.876 |
| Grip strength (left) | 31 | 22.1 ± 3.5 | 25 | 22.3 ± 4.4 | 0.888 |
| Grip strength max | 31 | 23.9 ± 3.7 | 25 | 24.3 ± 4.4 | 0.682 |
| Stand up | 31 | 12.0 ± 3.7 | 24 | 13.2 ± 7.3 | 0.486 |
| Walk speed | 31 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 24 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.147 |
| Walk speed max | 31 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 24 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.297 |
| Muscle | 29 | 31.7 ± 4.4 | 24 | 32.0 ± 4.2 | 0.800 |
| Quadmus | 29 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 25 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 0.469 |
| Volume of iliopsoas muscle | 30 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 25 | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 0.653 |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. Alb: albumin, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, CRE: creatinine, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, WBC: White blood cell, RBC: Red blood cell, Hb: hemoglobin, Ht: hematocrit, MCV: mean corpuscular volume, MCH: mean corpuscular hemoglobin, MCHC: mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
Figure 2Number of monthly Choisoko reservations. Blue bar indicates male. Orange bar indicates female.
Comparisons of FIM score changes.
| Choisoko Use | Non Choisoko Use | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change of FIM Score | N | Mean ± SD | N | Mean ± SD | Difference | |
| Total score | 28 | 1.86 ± 2.24 | 17 | 0.47 ± 2.45 | 1.39 | 0.067 |
| Exercise score | 28 | 0.46 ± 1.67 | 17 | −0.41 ± 2.50 | 0.88 | 0.212 |
| Cognitive score | 28 | 1.39 ± 1.52 | 17 | 0.88 ± 1.41 | 0.51 | 0.261 |
SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.
Percentage of reservations per person. n = 31, high percentage of multiple users, because you can understand the convenience once you use it.
| Number of Reservations | Number of Target People | |
|---|---|---|
| 1~4 | 9 (29.0%) | |
| 5~9 | 3 (9.7%) | |
| 10~19 | 14 (45.2%) |
|
| 20~29 | 3 (9.7%) | |
| 30 or more | 2 (6.4%) | |
Figure 3(A): relationship between the amount of change in the total FIM score and the number of times the choisoko is used. (B): the relationship between the amount of change in the FIM exercise score and the number of times the choisoko is used. (C): the relationship between the amount of change in the FIM cognitive score and the number of times the choisoko is used.
Figure 4Relationship between number of times the Choisoko using and QOL.
Figure 5(A) Choisoko usage and frequency of going out. The use of Choisoko creates going out. (B) Changes in quality of life due to the use of Choisoko.