Literature DB >> 36012974

Multivalvular Endocarditis: A Rare Condition with Poor Prognosis.

Sara Álvarez-Zaballos1, Victor González-Ramallo2, Eduard Quintana3, Patricia Muñoz4,5, Sofía de la Villa-Martínez4, M Carmen Fariñas6,7, Francisco Arnáiz-de Las Revillas6,7, Arístides de Alarcón8, M Ángeles Rodríguez-Esteban9, José M Miró7,10, Miguel Angel Goenaga11, Josune Goikoetxea-Agirre12, Elisa García-Vázquez13, Lucía Boix-Palop14, Manuel Martínez-Sellés1,15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe condition. Our aim was to describe the profile and prognosis of patients with multivalvular infective endocarditis (MIE) and compare them to single-valve IE (SIE).
METHODS: We used a retrospective analysis of the Spanish IE Registry (2008-2020).
RESULTS: From 4064 definite cases of valvular IE, 577 (14.2%) had MIE. In patients with MIE, the most common locations were mitral (552, 95.7%) and aortic (550, 95.3%), with mitral-aortic involvement present in 507 patients (87.9%). The most common etiologies were S. viridans (192, 33.3%) and S. aureus (113, 19.6%). MIE involved only native valves in 450 patients (78.0%). Compared with patients with SIE, patients with MIE had a similar age (69 vs. 67 years, respectively, p = 0.27) and similar baseline characteristics, but were more frequently men (67.1% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.005) and had a higher incidence of intracardiac complications (36.2% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001), heart failure (42.7% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001), surgical indication (67.7 vs. 85.1%, p < 0.001), surgery (46.3% vs. 56.3%), and in-hospital mortality (26.9% vs. 34.3%, p < 0.001). MIE was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.7, p = 0.004) but did not have an independent association with 1-year mortality (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4, p = 0.43).
CONCLUSIONS: About one-seventh of the valvular IE patients had MIE, mainly due to mitral-aortic involvement. MIE is associated with a poor in-hospital prognosis. An early diagnosis and treatment of IE might avoid its spread to a second valve.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infective endocarditis; mortality; multivalvular endocarditis; prognosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36012974      PMCID: PMC9410199          DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.964


1. Introduction

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe condition associated with high mortality and frequent complications [1]. Multivalvular IE (MIE) is relatively uncommon, with incidence ranging from 12% to 30% [2,3]. MIE information is scarce, and most published data come from case reports and surgical treatment techniques [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Few studies have compared MIE with single-valve IE (SIE) [2,9,11]. The prognostic influence of MIE is unclear as some data suggest an association with poor outcomes [3,4,5,12,13,14,15], whereas others do not [2,6,7,8,9,11]. The aim of our study was to describe the profile and prognosis of patients with MIE and to compare them with SIE in a large cohort of IE patients.

2. Materials and Methods

The Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis, Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la endocarditis infecciosa en ESpaña (GAMES), is a national observational prospective registry that has been previously described [16,17,18,19]. Multidisciplinary teams, including infectious disease physicians, cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, microbiologists, echocardiographers, and other imaging specialists, have completed standardized case report forms with information regarding IE episodes and follow-up data. A complete list of GAMES members is shown in Appendix A. IE patients at 38 Spanish hospitals between January 2008 and 2020 were included. Inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of definite valvular IE by modified Duke criteria [20]. IE management, including the decision to perform surgery and the type of surgery, was performed by the local medical team following the 2009 and 2015 European Society of Cardiology recommendations [1]. MIE was considered present when two or more valves were involved. Valve involvement was defined by echocardiography as valves with vegetations or new regurgitation or by direct intraoperative visualization of vegetations. This study complied with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of participating centers.

Statistical Methods

Continuous variables are summarized as means ± standard deviations (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges when normal distribution was not observed, as per the Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test; categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. Student‘s t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, or paired t-test was used to compare the continuous variables. The categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to assess the cumulative survival of patients with valvular IE according to the presence of SIE or MIE. The curves were compared with the log-rank test. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (backward selection) were performed to determine the mortality predictors and to assess the independent association of MIE with mortality. All variables with a p-value < 0.10 in univariate analyses were included in the multivariable analyses. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Of 5900 patients with possible or definite IE, 4531 had definite IE, 4064 had definite valvular IE, and 577 with MIE (14.2%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Flow chart of our cohort of patients from the Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis, Grupo de Apoyo al Manejo de la endocarditis infecciosa en ESpaña (GAMES). IE: infective endocarditis. CIED: cardiac implantable electronic device.

In patients with MIE, the most common locations were mitral (552, 95.7%) and aortic (550, 95.3%). MIE was mainly due to mitral-aortic involvement (507, 87.9%), right or left IE was only seen in 68 patients (11.8%), and tricuspid-pulmonary involvement was rare (2, 0.3%). MIE involved only native valves in 450 patients (78.0%). Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics and clinical events of our patients with valvular IE.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics and clinical events in patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE) according to the presence of single-valve IE (SIE) or multivalvular IE (MIE).

SIE (3487)MIE (577) p
Age, mean (IQR 1)69 (57–77)67 (57–76)0.273
Sex (Men)2341 (67.1%)421 (72.9%)0.005
Location
Aortic1827 (52.4%)550 (95.3%)<0.001
Mitral1428 (41.0%)552 (95.7%)<0.001
Tricuspid177 (5.1%)57 (9.9%)<0.001
Pulmonary50 (1.4%)18 (3.1%)0.003
Native IE 2326 (66.7%)450 (78.0%)<0.001
Prosthetic IE 1169 (33.5%)194 (33.6%)0.963
Etiology
Staphylococcus aureus 842 (24.1%)113 (19.6%)0.017
Coagulase-negative staphylococci618 (17.7%)94 (16.3%)0.402
Enterococcus 541 (15.5%)109 (18.9%)0.040
Streptococcus 999 (28.6%)192 (33.3%)0.024
Candida 50 (1.4%)7 (1.2%)0.676
Clinical course
Vegetation present2759 (79.1%)493 (85.4%)<0.001
Intracardiac complications 1261 (36.2%)291 (50.4%)<0.001
 Perforation or rupture533 (15.2%)150 (25.9%)<0.001
 Pseudoaneurysm242 (6.9%)56 (9.7%)0.018
 Abscess682 (19.5%)151 (26.1%)0.001
 Intracardiac fistula 98 (2.8%)26 (4.5%)0.028
Vascular phenomenon 378 (10.8%)60 (10.4%)0.751
New heart murmur 1261 (36.2%)263 (45.6%)<0.001
Heart failure1489 (42.7%)305 (52.9%)<0.001
Persistent bacteriemia 404 (11.6%)69 (12.0%)0.796
Central nervous system involvement 777 (22.3%)140 (24.3%)0.292
Embolization834 (23.9%)153 (26.5%)0.177
Renal failure1278 (36.7%)220 (38.1%)0.495
Septic shock465 (13.3%)94 (16.3%)0.056
Sepsis648 (18.6%)105 (18.2%)0.825
Indication for surgery 2360 (67.7%)491 (85.1%)<0.001
Cardiac surgery 1616 (46.3%)325 (56.3%)<0.001
Surgery indicated not performed 772 (22.1%)168 (29.1%)<0.001
Mean hospital stay (IQR)36 (22–52)38 (22–54)0.368
Antibiotic treatment days, mean (IQR)40 (28–46)38 (21–45)0.368
In-hospital mortality937 (26.9%)198 (34.3%)<0.001
1-year mortality 1146 (32.9%)222 (38.5%)0.008
IE Recurrence in those alive42 (1.6%)7 (1.8%)0.777

1 IQR: interquartile range.

Compared with patients with SIE, patients with MIE had a similar age (69 vs. 67 years), were more frequently men (67% vs. 73%), and had a more common streptococcal etiology (29% vs. 33%). Complications were also more common in MIE, including intracardiac complications (36% vs. 50%) and heart failure (43% vs. 53%). MIE was associated with surgical indication (68% vs. 85%) and surgery (46% vs. 56%). Compared with patients with SIE, patients with MIE had higher in-hospital mortality (34% vs. 27%). MIE was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.7) (Table 2A). One-year mortality was also higher in patients with MIE than in those with SIE (39% vs. 33%, Figure 2), although MIE did not have an independent association with one-year mortality (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9–1.4, p = 0.43) (Table 2B).
Table 2

A. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE). B. Independent predictors of 1-year mortality in patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE).

(A)
OR (95% CI) p
Male sex0.8 (0.7–0.9)0.041
Charlson comorbidity index1.12 (1.09–1.16)<0.001
Heart failure2.9 (2.5–3.4)<0.001
Multivalvular IE1.3 (1.1–1.7)0.004
Severe sepsis2.1 (1.8–2.6)<0.001
S. aureus 1.7 (1.4–2.1)<0.001
Nosocomial IE1.6 (1.3–1.9)<0.001
Intracardiac abscess1.3 (1.1–1.7)0.004
Age (years)1.015 (1.008–1.022)<0.001
(B)
OR (95% CI) p
Mitral location1.2 (1.0–1.4)0.017
Charlson comorbidity index1.15 (1.12–1.19)<0.001
Heart failure2.5 (2.2–2.9)<0.001
Persistent bacteriemia1.2 (1.0–1.5)0.043
Severe sepsis2.0 (1.7–2.4)<0.001
S. aureus 1.4 (1.2–1.7)<0.001
Nosocomial IE1.6 (1.3–1.9)<0.001
Intracardiac abscess1.4 (1.1–1.7)<0.001
Age (years)1.015 (1.015–1.009)<0.001
Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for the cumulative survival of patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE) according to the presence of single-valve IE (SIE) or multivalvular IE (MIE). p-value reflects the result of the log-rank test.

4. Discussion

In our large national cohort of valvular IE, one-seventh of patients had MIE, which was associated with a poor prognosis. MIE can involve native and prosthetic valves. The primary event is bacterial adherence to damaged valves during bacteriemia, with later persistence and growth within the cardiac lesions causing local extensions and tissue damage [21]. MIE can be the result of a simultaneous infection in two previously damaged valves in a patient with persistent bacteriemia or, more often, sequential seeding of a previously damaged valve [11]. In other cases, the infection of the first valve creates a new valvular lesion. A jet of aortic regurgitation may damage and infect the anterior mitral leaflet, which can also cause mechanical complications in the leaflets and mitral valve apparatus [11,21,22]. Other proposed mechanisms are the formation of an anterior abscess spreading and the destruction of the mitral annulus, or the prolapsing aortic IE “kissing vegetation phenomenon” [23]. Bilateral IE is uncommon (12% in our series) and might be related to shunts produced by congenital heart diseases [3], intracardiac devices, or repeated injections by drug users. The most common etiologies in our and other cohorts were streptococcal, staphylococcal, and enterococcal [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,24]. S. viridans infections more frequently occurred in MIE compared with SIE, a fact that has been previously reported [3,4,6,11,24]. However, the incidence of Staphylococci IE is increasing [25]. S. gallolyticus (S. bovis) also has a high frequency of multivalvular locations, especially in French registries [11], more often infecting advanced age patients with known heart disease. Surgical treatment is frequently needed in IE and even more so in MIE. About 85% of our MIE patients had a surgical indication, a higher proportion than in SIE, although only in 56% of MIE patients was surgery finally performed. MIE patients develop heart failure more often than SIE patients, and heart failure is a common surgical indication [1]. In addition, patients with MIE frequently present extensive tissue destruction [24]. These two factors are probably related to the higher rate of surgical treatment in MIE than in SIE [3,4,6,9]. The prognostic influence of MIE is unclear. An association with poor outcomes has been described in some studies [3,4,5,12,13,14,15,26] but not in others [2,6,7,8,9,11,24]. Prosthetic IE is an important compounding factor when we compare MIE with SIE, as prosthetic IE is associated with a poor prognosis [4]. Table 3 summarizes the main information previously published regarding MIE. The mean age was higher in our cohort than in the published studies, probably because most previous data came from surgical series, and patients eligible for surgery are usually younger.
Table 3

Previous data and our cohort results in patients with multivalvular infective endocarditis (MIE).

First Author, YearN and Cohort TypeMIEMean/Median Age (Years)Main EtiologiesMIE in-Hospital Mortality
Kim et al., 2000 [2]77 14 (31%) 65S. aureus 43%S. viridans 36%21% overall 29% surgery
Mihalhevic et al., 2001 [4] 63 MIE surgeryAll 49S. viridans 28% S. aureus 16%
Gillinov et al., 2001 [6]54 MIE surgeryAll50Streptococci 70%Staphylococci 18%0%
David et al., 2007 [7]383 IE surgery101 (26%)51S. aureus 23%S. viridans 18%12%
Yao et al., 2009 [3]388 IE surgery48 (12%) 42S. viridans 29%S. aureus 19%13%
Sheikh et al., 2009 [8]90 MIE surgeryAll53S. aureus 16%S. viridans 14%15%
Selton et al., 2010 [11]300 IE511 IE42 (14%) 88 (17%) 5860Streptococci 64%S. aureus 14%26%23%
López et al., 2011 [15]680 IE115 (17%) 58S. aureus 22%Coagulase-negative staphylococci 18%30%
Ota et al., 2011 [9]152 native valve IE surgery35 (23%)47S. aureus 22%S. viridans 22%9%
Kim et al., 2013 [24]90 native valve IE surgery23 (25%)47S. viridans 70%0%
Our cohort 4064 IE577 (14%)67S. viridans 33%S. aureus 20%34%
Comparisons of SIE and information regarding medically treated patients are scarce. Moreover, a surgical series of selected patients shows excellent results that do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Our series of MIE is the largest reported to date and includes both patients treated with and without surgery. The limitations of this study should be noted. Local medical teams were responsible for IE management, including deciding on surgery, and any judgments may have been influenced by factors not registered in this study. In any case, our data come from a large national database and show a clear association of MIE with IE prognosis.

5. Conclusions

About one-seventh of the valvular IE patients had MIE, mainly due to mitral-aortic involvement. MIE is associated with a poor in-hospital prognosis. An early diagnosis and treatment of IE might avoid its spread to a second valve.
  26 in total

1.  Valve surgery in active infective endocarditis: a simple score to predict in-hospital prognosis.

Authors:  Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Patricia Muñoz; Ana Arnáiz; Mar Moreno; Juan Gálvez; Jorge Rodríguez-Roda; Arístides de Alarcón; Emilio García Cabrera; María C Fariñas; José M Miró; Miguel Montejo; Alfonso Moreno; Josefa Ruiz-Morales; Miguel A Goenaga; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Multi-valvular endocarditis.

Authors:  N Kim; J M Lazar; B A Cunha; W Liao; V Minnaganti
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  The importance of secondary mitral valve involvement in primary aortic valve endocarditis; the mitral kissing vegetation.

Authors:  C Piper; R Hetzer; R Körfer; R Bergemann; D Horstkotte
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Multiple-valve infective endocarditis: clinical, microbiologic, echocardiographic, and prognostic profile.

Authors:  Javier López; Ana Revilla; Isidre Vilacosta; Teresa Sevilla; Héctor García; Itziar Gómez; Eduardo Pozo; Cristina Sarriá; José Alberto San Román
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Clinical and microbiologic features of multivalvular endocarditis.

Authors:  Christine Selton-Suty; Thanh Doco-Lecompte; Yvette Bernard; Xavier Duval; Lorraine Letranchant; François Delahaye; Marie Célard; François Alla; Jean-Pierre Carteaux; Bruno Hoen
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  Infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Philippe Moreillon; Yok-Ai Que
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  [Predictors of hospital mortality in 186 cases of active infective endocarditis treated in a tertiary medical center (1992-2001)].

Authors:  J Horacio Casabé; Héctor Deschle; Claudia Cortés; Pablo Stutzbach; Alejandro Hershson; Claudia Nagel; Eduardo Guevara; Augusto Torino; Héctor Raffaelli; Roberto R Favaloro; Luis D Suárez
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.753

Review 8.  Evolving trends in infective endocarditis.

Authors:  E E Hill; P Herijgers; M-C Herregods; W E Peetermans
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Surgical treatment of multivalvular endocarditis: twenty-one-year single center experience.

Authors:  Feng Yao; Lin Han; Zhi-yun Xu; Liang-jian Zou; Sheng-dong Huang; Zhi-nong Wang; Fang-lin Lu; Ying-long Yao
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Infective Endocarditis in Diabetic Patients: A Different Profile with Prognostic Consequences.

Authors:  María Isabel Biezma; Patricia Muñoz; Sofía De la Villa; Mª Carmen Fariñas-Álvarez; Francisco Arnáiz de Las Revillas; Encarnación Gutierrez-Carretero; Arístides De Alarcón; Raquel Rodríguez-García; Jaume Llopis; Miguel Ángel Goenaga; Andrea Gutierrez-Villanueva; Antonio Plata; Laura Vidal; Manuel Martínez-Sellés
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.