| Literature DB >> 36012972 |
Joanna Peczyńska1, Bożenna Klonowska2, Beata Żelazowska-Rutkowska3, Agnieszka Polkowska1, Klaudyna Noiszewska1, Artur Bossowski1, Barbara Głowińska-Olszewska1.
Abstract
Recent years have confirmed the importance of oxidative stress and biomarkers of inflammation in estimating the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and explaining not fully understood pathogenesis of diabetic macroangiopathy. We aimed to analyze the relation between the intima-media thickness (IMT) of common carotid arteries and the occurrence of classical cardiovascular risk factors, together with the newly proposed biomarkers of CVD risk (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), adiponectin, N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and vitamin D) in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) recognized in screening tests to present early stages of microvascular complications (VC). The study group consisted of 50 adolescents and young adults with T1D, mean age 17.1 years (10-26 age range), including 20 patients with VC (+) and 30 VC (-). The control group (Control) consisted of 22 healthy volunteers, mean age 16.5 years (11-26 age range). In the VC (+) patients, we found a significantly higher concentration of HbA1c, lipid levels, hsCRP and NT-proBNP. BMI and blood pressure values were highest in the VC (+) group. Higher levels of MPO and lower levels of vitamin D were found in both diabetic groups vs. Control. IMT in VC (+) patients was significantly higher and correlated positively with HbA1c, hsCRP, NT-pro-BNP and negatively with vitamin D levels. In conclusion, youth with T1D and VC (+) present many abnormalities in the classical and new CVD biomarkers. hsCRP and MPO seem to be the most important markers for estimating the risk of macroangiopathy. NT-proBNP may present a possible marker of early myocardial injury in this population.Entities:
Keywords: IMT; biomarkers; inflammation; macroangiopathy; microvascular complications; obesity; oxidative stress; risk of cardiovascular disease; type 1 diabetes; youth
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012972 PMCID: PMC9409989 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
General characteristics of the study groups.
| T1D Total | T1D Group without Vascular Complications | T1D Group with Vascular Complications | Control Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17.1 ± 3 | 16.8 ± 3.0 | 18.3 ± 3.3 | 16.5 ± 5.0 |
|
| 20 (40%)/30 (60%) | 13 | 10 (50%)/10 (50%) | 9 (41%)/13 (59%) |
|
| 10.3 ± 3.1 | 10.0 ± 2.8 | 11.6 ± 3.2 | |
|
| 6.8 ± 3.6 | 6.8 ± 3.9 | 6.7 ± 3.5 | |
|
| 63.4 ± 14.5 | 60.3 ± 13.3 | 67.0 ± 14.0 | 54.0 ± 13.8 |
|
| 170.6 ± 11 | 170.5 ± 11 | 169.4 ± 12 | 164.4 ± 13 |
|
| 8.4 ± 1.3 | 8.1 ± 1.1 | 9.6 ± 1.2 * | |
|
| 8.7 ± 1.2 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 9.8 ± 1.6 * | 5.4 ± 0.3 |
|
| 0.8 ± 0.18 | 0.8 ± 0.16 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | |
|
| 7.9 ± 7.6 | 8.8 ± 7.6 | 5.6 ± 6.3 | |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.16 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
|
| 25.1 ± 18 | 21.6 ± 7.4 | 27.2 ± 12.1 * | 23.5 ± 6.5 |
|
| 28 ± 10 | 27.1 ± 10.0 | 32.8 ± 15.1 | 24.6 ± 7.1 |
The data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 in Student’s t-test (difference between patients with T1D without vascular complications and T1D with vascular complications).
Clinical characteristics, lipids, metabolic control, “new biomarkers” of cardiovascular disease between study groups. The results are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).
| T1D without | T1D with Vascular Complications | Control Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| a 21.28 ± 2.9 | a 23.07 ± 4 | 19.65 ± 2.4 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.40 ± 1.0 | a 0.91 ± 1.5 | −0.01 ± 0.58 | 0.021 |
|
| a 75.10 ± 7.6 | a 78.48 ± 9 | 69.0 ± 7.4 | <0.001 |
|
| a 0.54 ± 1.0 | a 0.93 ± 1.1 | 0.011 ± 0.79 | 0.009 |
|
| a 121 ± 11 | a 129 ± 14 | 109 ± 9 | <0.001 |
|
| 71 ± 6 | ab 77 ± 10 | 69 ± 5 | 0.003 |
|
| 176 ± 25 | a 191 ± 38 | 164 ± 29 | 0.03 |
|
| 101 ± 28 | a 112 ± 35 | 89 ± 28 | 0.06 |
|
| 57 ± 11 | ab 52 ± 7 | 59 ± 11 | 0.05 |
|
| 82 ± 27 | ab 115 ± 67 | 75 ± 39 | 0.002 |
|
| 8.1 ± 1.1 | b 9.6 ± 1.2 | - | <0.001 |
|
| a 8.6 ± 0.4 | ab 9.8 ± 1.6 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
|
| 7704.6 | 7279.8 | 9746.6 | 0.71 |
|
| a 200.8 | a 147.750 | 96.8 | 0.06 |
|
| 23.4 | ab 51.07 | 28.9 | 0.01 |
|
| 0.36 | ab 1.14 | 0.2 | <0.001 |
|
| a 17.9 ± 7.9 | a 14.3 ± 5 | 25.4 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
* ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis test; a p < 0.05—in comparison to the controls; b p < 0.05—in comparison to the diabetes group without vascular complication in post hoc analyses.
Figure 1BMI (A), SDS-BMI (B), waist circumference (C) and waist SDS (D) in the studied groups.
Figure 2Selected “new biomarkers” (A–D) of the atherosclerotic process in the studied groups.
Figure 3Carotid IMT in the studied groups.
Figure 4IMT correlations with chosen variables (A–D) in patients with T1D and vascular complications.
Analysis of associations between IMT and studied variables in group of T1D with vascular complications VC (+).
| IMT | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| Rho = 0.1 | |
|
| Rho = −0.22 | |
|
| Rho = 0.35 | |
|
| Rho = 0.22 | |
|
| Rho = 0.2 | |
|
| Rho = 0.58 | |
|
| Rho = 0.26 | |
|
| Rho = 0.11 | |
|
| Rho = 0.19 | |
|
| Rho = −0.42 | |
|
| Rho = 0.26 | |
|
| Rho = 0.76 | |
|
| Rho = 0.23 | |
|
| Rho = 0.12 | |
|
| Rho = 0.39 | |
|
| Rho = 0.36 | |
|
| Rho = −0.54 | |
Figure 5Proposed pathophysiological impact of classical risk factors and new biomarkers on the progression of atherosclerosis and possible ways to influence the process of diminishing vascular disease development.