| Literature DB >> 36012621 |
Chenzhi Zhang1, Dashuang Wang1, Lichao Dong2, Kailin Li1, Yifan Zhang1, Pingan Yang3, Shuang Yi1, Xingjian Dai1, Changqing Yin1, Zhilan Du1, Xinfang Zhang1, Quan Zhou1, Zhiyu Yi1, Jinsong Rao1, Yuxin Zhang1.
Abstract
A neoteric round sieve diatomite (De) decorated with sea-urchin-like alpha-type iron trioxide (α-Fe2O3) synthetics was prepared by the hydrothermal method and further calcination. The results of the electromagnetic (EM) parameters of α-Fe2O3-decorated De (α-Fe2O3@D) showed that the minimum reflection loss (RLmin) of α-Fe2O3@D could reach -54.2 dB at 11.52 GHz and the matched absorber thickness was 3 mm. The frequency bandwidth corresponding to the microwave RL value below -20 dB was up to 8.24 GHz (9.76-18 GHz). This indicates that α-Fe2O3@D composite can be a lightweight and stable material; because of the low density of De (1.9-2.3 g/cm3), the density of α-Fe2O3@D composite material is lower than that of α-Fe2O3 (5.18 g/cm3). We found that the combination of the magnetic loss of sea-urchin-like α-Fe2O3 and the dielectric loss of De has the most dominant role in electromagnetic wave absorption and loss. We focused on comparing the absorbing properties before and after the formation of sea-urchin-like α-Fe2O3 and explain in detail the effects of the structure and crystal shape of this novel composite on the absorbing properties.Entities:
Keywords: diatomite; microwave absorption; α-Fe2O3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012621 PMCID: PMC9409334 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Magnification increases from left to right. SEM images of (a–c) MnO2@D; (d–f) FeOOH@D; (g–i) α-Fe2O3@D.
Figure 2XRD patterns of De, MnO2@D, FeOOH@D and α-Fe2O3@D. (a) The XPS of α-Fe2O3@D: survey; (b) O 1s; (c) Fe 2p; (d) (M−H) loops of MnO2@D, FeOOH@D and α-Fe2O3@D; (e) Illustration: the relationship between magnetization and magnetic field of the sample is shown in an enlarged view.
Figure 3Relevant EM parameters of MnO2@D; (a–c) FeOOH@D; (d–f) and α-Fe2O3@D; (g–i). Frequency dependence of ε′, ε″, μ′ and μ″ (a,d,g); dielectric and loss tangent (b,e,h); attenuation constant α and μ″(μ′)−2f−1 values (c,f,i).
Figure 4One—dimensional, two—dimensional, and three—dimensional picture of the RL values, which varies with frequency and thickness: (a–c) MnO2@D, (d–f) FeOOH@D and (g–i) α-Fe2O3@D.
RL(min) and effective absorption bandwidths (RL < −20 dB) of MnO2@D, FeOOH@D and α-Fe2O3@D.
| Sample Name | RL(min) | Effective Absorption Bandwidth (RL < −20 dB) |
|---|---|---|
| MnO2@D | −7.9 dB | 0 |
| FeOOH@D | −17.8 dB | 0 |
| α-Fe2O3@D | −54.2 dB | 8.24 GHz |
Figure 5Microwave absorption mechanism of α-Fe2O3@D composite materials.
Figure 6Frequency dependence of impedance matching Zr of the MnO2@D, FeOOH@D and α-Fe2O3@D composite material.
Comparison with other De basic materials.
| Sample Name | Percentage | RLmin (dB) | Absorberthickness (mm) | EAB(RL < −10 dB) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe2O4/α-Fe2O3 | 20 | −52.69 | 3 | 5.36 | [ |
| α-Fe2O3-graphene | 15 | −30.6 | 4 | 5.5 | [ |
| α-Fe2O3/OPEFB fiber/PCL | 25 | −38 | 6 | 3 | [ |
| RGO/PANI/α-Fe2O3@SiO2 with 1:4 | 16.7 | −31.06 | 5 | 2 | [ |
| RGO/PANI/α-Fe2O3@SiO2 with 1:6 | 16.7 | −25.88 | 4 | 3 | [ |
| α-Fe2O3@D | 20 | −54.2 | 3 | 8.24 | this work |