| Literature DB >> 36012431 |
Margarita Y Komarova1,2, Sergey V Rozhkov1, Oksana A Ivanova2, Olga V Turtikova1, Timur M Mirzoev1, Renata I Dmitrieva2, Boris S Shenkman1, Natalia A Vilchinskaya1.
Abstract
The structure and function of soleus muscle fibers undergo substantial remodeling under real or simulated microgravity conditions. However, unloading-induced changes in the functional activity of skeletal muscle primary myoblasts remain poorly studied. The purpose of our study was to investigate how short-term and long-term mechanical unloading would affect cultured myoblasts derived from rat soleus muscle. Mechanical unloading was simulated by rat hindlimb suspension model (HS). Myoblasts were purified from rat soleus at basal conditions and after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of HS. Myoblasts were expanded in vitro, and the myogenic nature was confirmed by their ability to differentiate as well as by immunostaining/mRNA expression of myogenic markers. The proliferation activity at different time points after HS was analyzed, and transcriptome analysis was performed. We have shown that soleus-derived myoblasts differently respond to an early and later stage of HS. At the early stage of HS, the proliferative activity of myoblasts was slightly decreased, and processes related to myogenesis activation were downregulated. At the later stage of HS, we observed a decrease in myoblast proliferative potential and spontaneous upregulation of the pro-myogenic program.Entities:
Keywords: MRF; differentiation; mechanical unloading; myoblast; myogenesis; proliferation; soleus muscle; transcriptome analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012431 PMCID: PMC9409304 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Changes in soleus muscle weight following 1, 3, 7 and 14 days of mechanical unloading (HS): (a) rat soleus muscle weight normalized to the body weight; n = 16, **** p < 0.0001; (b) Myogenic differentiation (the 5th day of differentiation) of myoblasts purified from control muscle and hindlimb suspended muscle (HS1, HS3, HS7, HS14). Myotube formation was visualized with F-actin antibody; scale bar = 20 µm.
Figure 2Functional properties of myoblasts cultured for 24 h after purification: (a) Myoblast proliferative activity analysis by EdU incorporation; EdU+ cells are shown in red; nuclei are shown in blue. (b) Immunostaining: MYOD and PAX7 positive cells are shown in red; nuclei are shown in blue; F-actin is shown in green; scale bar = 20 µm. (c) The percentage of EdU+ cells estimated in 2 independent experiments; n > 200, ** p < 0.01. (d) The percentage of MYOD positive cells increases in the HS7 cultures, in contrast to PAX7 positive cells; n > 200, * p < 0.05.
Figure 3The effect of skeletal muscle functional unloading on myogenic factors expression in myoblasts cultured for 24 h after purification: (a) Immunostaining for slow myosin MYH7 in cultured myoblasts: MYH7—green, F-actin red; MYOG in non-differentiated myoblasts: MYOG red; F-actin green; nuclei blue; scale bar = 20 µm; F-actin staining was used as a positive control; (b–l) mRNA expression analysis: Pax7 (a marker of satellite cells); MyoD and MyoG (myogenic regulatory factors); Myh7 (slow-twitch myosin); Myh3 (embryonic myosin); Myh1 (fast-twitch myosin); Myh8 (fetal skeletal muscle myosin); Mymk and Mymx (myoblasts fusion markers); Mrf4 (myogenic regulatory factor); Myf5 (myogenic regulatory factor); (n = 4; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 4A transcriptome analysis revealed a change in myogenic potential at different time-points of mechanical unloading: (a) K-means clustering analysis of 15,829 genes in the Contr, HS1, HS3, HS7 and HS14 samples; (b) GSEA enrichment plots of the hallmark myogenesis pathway over ranked genes between possible pairs of cultured myoblasts: Contr, HS1, HS3, HS7 and HS14; p < 0.01, normalized enrichment scores (NES) are shown.
Figure 5Differentially expressed genes associated with muscle regeneration and differentiation processes: (a) Number of up- and downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found in all four pairs (HS vs. Control); log2 fold change > 1.5, p < 0.01; (b–e) GO Enrichment Analysis of upregulated and downregulated DEGs using GO Biological Process database.
Pathways associated with the DEGs downregulated in HS1 vs. CONTR (p < 0.01).
| Pathways | Number of DEGs | Genes |
|---|---|---|
| Extracellular matrix organization | 34 | |
| Striated muscle tissue development | 42 | |
| Regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration | 22 | |
| Regulation of cellular response to growth factor stimulus | 20 | |
| Transmembrane receptor protein serine/threonine kinase signaling pathway | 20 | |
| Muscle cell differentiation | 18 | |
| ERK1 and ERK2 cascade | 15 | |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 14 | |
| Response to transforming growth factor β | 13 | |
| BMP signaling pathway | 12 | |
| Regulation of Wnt signaling pathway | 12 | |
| Tumor necrosis factor production | 11 | |
| Calcium-mediated signaling | 10 | |
| Cellular response to mechanical stimulus | 8 | |
| Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling | 8 | |
| Apoptotic process involved in development | 5 |
Pathways associated with the DEGs upregulated in HS7 vs. CONTR (p < 0.01).
| Pathways | Number of DEGs | Genes |
|---|---|---|
| Striated muscle tissue development | 42 | |
| Muscle cell differentiation | 37 | |
| Actomyosin structure organization | 19 | |
| Calcium ion transport | 19 | |
| Myotube differentiation | 12 | |
| Notch signaling pathway | 11 | |
| Potassium ion transport | 11 | |
| Cellular response to transforming growth factor β stimulus | 11 | |
| Regulation of apoptotic process involved in development | 4 |
Pathways associated with the DEGs downregulated in HS7 vs CONTR (p < 0.01).
| Pathways | Number of DEGs | Genes |
|---|---|---|
| Wnt signaling pathway | 15 | |
| Transmembrane receptor protein serine/ | 14 | |
| Canonical Wnt signaling pathway | 13 | |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 12 | |
| Stem cell differentiation | 9 | |
| BMP signaling pathway | 9 |
Figure 6The fast gene set enrichment analysis (FGSEA) of all identified genes using the GO Biological Process database. Results visualized as bar plot of normalized enrichment score (NES) that display significant up/downregulated pathways that regulate the progress of cells through the cell cycle and the activation of the myogenic program in the early and late stages of unloading.
Figure 7The experimental design.
Primers used for the qRT-PCR analysis.
| Gene Name | Sequence (5′->3′) | GenBank |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-tataagagggagaaccccgga-3′ | NM_001191984.1 |
|
| 5′-ccctgatgtatcaaacgcatgt-3′ | NM_001106783.1 |
|
| 5′-cttgagggtgcggatttcct-3′ | NM_013172.2 |
|
| 5′-ggtcccaacccaggagatca-3′ | NM_017115.3 |
|
| 5′-tgctctgatggcatgatgga-3′ | NM_176079.2 |
|
| 5′-cggtgtgaacggatttggc-3′ | NM_017008.4 |
|
| 5′-gatcgctgctatcacgcct-3′ | NM_001399466.1 |
|
| 5′-tctttgtggcgttctcccat-3′ | NM_001399315.1 |