| Literature DB >> 36012422 |
Dongxu Li1, Zheshu Ma1, Wei Shao1, Yanju Li1, Xinjia Guo1.
Abstract
In order to improve the output performance of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFC), a finite time thermodynamic (FTT) model for HT-PEMFC was established. Several finite time thermodynamic indexes including power density, thermodynamic efficiency, exergy efficiency, exergetic performance efficient (EPC), entropy production rate and ecological coefficient of performance (ECOP) were derived. The energetic performance, exergetic performance and ecological performance of the HT-PEMFC were analyzed under different parameters. Results showed that operating temperature, doping level and thickness of membrane had a significant effect on the performance of HT-PEMFC and the power density increased by 58%, 31.1% and 44.9%, respectively. When the doping level reached 8, the output performance of HT-PEMFC wa optimal. The operating pressure and relative humidity had little influence on the HT-PEMFC and the power density increased by 8.7%% and 17.6%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: HT-PEMFC; ecological coefficient of performance; exergetic performance efficient; finite time thermodynamic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012422 PMCID: PMC9409233 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Working principle of HT-PEMFC.
Parameters of HT-PEMFC model.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Environment temperature, | 298.15 |
| Faraday constant, | 96,485 |
| Gas constant, | 8.314 |
| Charge transfer coefficient, | 0.25 |
| Current density, | 0–20,000 |
| Operating temperature, | 413–473 |
| Operating pressure, | 1–3 |
| Relative humidity, | 0–7.6 |
| The phosphoric acid doping level, | 2–10 |
| The thickness of membrane, | 0.002–0.010 |
| Activation area, | 600 |
Figure 2Comparison of experimental and simulation results under different .
Figure 3Different indexes vary with current density at different operating temperatures: (a) P and η; (b) δ and EPC; (c) φ and ECOP.
Figure 4Different indexes vary with current density at different operating pressures: (a) P and η; (b) δ and EPC; (c) φ and ECOP.
Figure 5Different indexes vary with current density at different relative humidity: (a) P and η; (b) δ and EPC; (c) φ and ECOP.
Figure 6The influence of doping level on proton conductivity.
Figure 7Different indexes vary with current density at different doping level: (a) P and η; (b) δ and EPC; (c) φ and ECOP.
Figure 8Different indexes vary with current density at different membrane thicknesses: (a) P and η; (b) δ and EPC; (c) φ and ECOP.
Figure 9The relationship between power density and thermal efficiency: (a) ; (b) ; (c) ; (d) ; (e) .