| Literature DB >> 36012376 |
Qi Dong1, Jingwen Lei1, Hanjian Wang1, Meifang Ke1, Xiao Liang1, Xindi Yang1, Hui Liang2, Céline Huselstein3, Zan Tong1, Yun Chen1.
Abstract
Soy protein isolate (SPI) is green, high-yield natural plant protein, which is widely applied in industry (packing material and adhesives) and tissue engineering. It is meaningful to improve the antibacterial property of soy protein isolate to fabricate versatile safe products to meet people's requirements. In this study, quaternized soy protein isolate (QSPI) was synthesized by the reaction between 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethylammonium chloride (EPTMAC) and SPI. The positive charged (17.8 ± 0.23 mV) quaternary ammonium groups endow the QSPI with superior antibacterial properties against multiple bacteria in vitro and in vivo. Notably, QSPI maintains its good biocompatibility and promotes bacterial-infected wound healing in rat models. Furthermore, QSPI possesses superior water solubility in a broad pH range than raw SPI. Altogether, this soy protein isolate derivative with antibacterial property and superior water solubility may extend the application of SPI in industry and tissue engineering.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial property; quaternization; soy protein isolate; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012376 PMCID: PMC9409154 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the fabrication and application of quaternized soy protein isolate. (a) The synthetic method of QSPI. (b) The water solubility of QSPI. (c) The antibacterial property and biocompatibility of QSPI. (d) The therapeutic process of bacterial-infected wound healing by QSPI.
Figure 2Synthesis and characterization of quaternized soy protein isolate (QSPI). (a) The reaction principle of OPA reagent and compound (2) has a marked absorption peak at 336 nm in the UV–vis absorption spectra (b). (c) The degree of quaternization of the QSPI-n. (d) The FTIR spectra of SPI and QSPI-2.0. (e) The 1HNMR spectra of SPI and QSPI-2.0. (f) The isoelectric point of SPI and QSPI-n. (g) The water solubility of SPI and QSPI-n in aqueous solution with pH = 2, 7, and 13. The water solubility of SPI in solution with pH = 13 as control. (h) The zeta potential of QSPI-n at pH = 7. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3The antibacterial property of SPI and QSPI-2.0. (a) Agar plate images of CFU test for antibacterial properties of SPI and QSPI-2.0 against E. coli, S. aureus and MRSA. The statistical analysis results of the CFU test of E. coli (b); S. aureus (c); and MRSA (d). The results of proliferation assay of QSPI-2.0 with different concentrations against E. coli (e); S. aureus (f); and MRSA (g). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4Biocompatibility evaluation of QSPI-2.0. (a) Live/dead cell staining of L929 cells after treatment with 0.5–2.5 mg/mL QSPI-2.0 for 48 h. (b) Cell viability of L929 cells after treatment with 0.5–2.5 mg/mL QSPI-2.0 for 48 h. (c) Hemolysis assay of QSPI-2.0. * p < 0.05.
Figure 5Effects of the QSPI-2.0 in a rat infected wound healing model. (a) The schematic diagram illustrates the establishment and treatment of the bacteria-infected wound. (b) Representative images of the bacteria-infected wound healing. (c) Quantification of wound healing rate. (d) Photographs of CFU test of bacteria derived from wound sites on Day 3 after different treatments. (e) Bacterial viability was calculated according to the CFU test. Images of histological analysis for wound regeneration on Day 10 (f) and Day 20 (g). Black lines point to the boundary of epidermis and dermis; green arrows point to the hair follicles and red arrows point to blood vessels. Statistical results of (h) granulation tissue thickness of the regenerating skin on Day 10 and (i) epidermal thickness of the regenerated skin tissue on Day 20. (j) Masson trichrome staining images of the regenerated skin tissue. (k) Quantification of the collagen deposition ratio in each group on Day 20. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6Immunofluorescence images of the regenerated wound tissue. Immunofluorescence staining against TNF-α (green) and CD31 (red) on Day 10 (a) and Day 20 (b); Statistical analysis of TNF-α (c) and CD31 (d) relative fluorescence intensity. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.