| Literature DB >> 36012335 |
Reyna Peñailillo1, Stephanie Acuña-Gallardo1,2, Felipe García1, Lara J Monteiro1,2,3, Gino Nardocci2,3,4, Mahesh A Choolani5, Matthew W Kemp5,6, Roberto Romero7,8,9,10,11, Sebastián E Illanes1,2,3.
Abstract
Endometrial stromal cells play an important role in reproductive success, especially in implantation and placentation. Although Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied to assess decidualization disorders in preeclampsia (PE), their role during trophoblast invasion remains unclear. This study aims to determine: (i) whether MSCs isolated from menstrual fluid (MenSCs) from nulliparous, multiparous, and women with a previous history of preeclampsia exhibited different patterns of proliferation and migration and (ii) whether reproductive history (i.e., prior pregnancy or prior history of PE) was able to produce changes in MenSCs, thus altering trophoblast invasion capacity. MenSCs were collected from nulliparous and multiparous women without a history of PE and from non-pregnant women with a history of PE. Proliferation and migration assays were performed on MenSCs with sulforhodamine B and transwell assays, respectively. Trophoblast invasion was analyzed by culturing HTR-8/SVneo trophospheres on a matrigel overlying MenSCs for 72 h at 5% O2, simulating a 3D implantation model. A previous history of pregnancy or PE did not impact the proliferative capacity or migratory behavior of MenSCs. Following exposure to physiological endometrial conditions, MenSCs demonstrated upregulated expression of IGFBP-1 and LIF mRNA, decidualization and window of implantation markers, respectively. The mRNA expression of VIM, NANOG, and SOX2 was upregulated upon trophosphere formation. Relative to co-culture with multiparous MenSCs, co-culture with PE-MenSCs was associated with reduced trophoblast invasion. The findings of this study suggest a potential role for communication between maternal MenSCs and invading trophoblast cells during the implantation process that could be implicated in the etiology of PE.Entities:
Keywords: MenSCs; preeclampsia; trophoblast invasion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012335 PMCID: PMC9409195 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23169071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Characteristics of controls and preeclampsia donors.
| Characteristics | Nulliparous | Multiparous | Preeclampsia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 10) | (n = 10) | (n = 9) | ||
| Age (years) | 27.6 ± 4.5 | 34 ± 4.6 | 35.0 ± 5.3 | 0.005 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 23.2 ± 3.4 | 22.2 ± 3.2 | 24.8 ± 4.7 | 0.319 |
| Gravidity | 0 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 0.086 |
| Gestational age at last delivery | - | 37.7 ± 1.1 | 33.3 ± 5.9 | 0.045 |
| Newborn weight | - | 3240 ± 388.2 | 2100 ± 1014.8 | 0.004 |
BMI, body mass index. Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test for the variables age and BMI (between the 3 groups), meanwhile for gravidity, gestational age at last delivery and newborn weight, Student’s t-test was performed (MUL and PE groups).
Figure 1Proliferation and migration of MenSCs derived from nulliparous (NUL), multiparous (MUL) and PE women. (A) MenSCs were seeded for SRB assays to quantify cell proliferation at day 3, day 6, and day 9. Results are presented as mean values and SDs of eight MenSCs per group. (B) NUL and MUL MenSCs migration assays. (C) MUL and PE MenSCs trans-migration assays. Results are presented as mean values and SDs of six MenSCs per group. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann–Whitney tests. MenSCs, mesenchymal stem cells derived from the menstrual fluid; PE, preeclampsia; SD, standard deviation; SRB, sulforhodamine B.
Figure 2Characterization of MenSCs after endometrial physiological conditions (Mimic). Gene expression of decidualization markers: (A) Prolactin (PRL) and (B) insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) were detected in MenSCs. Window of implantation marker (C) leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) was detected in MenSCs after hormonal treatment. Results are expressed as mean and SD of nine MenSCs per group. * p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. MenSCs, mesenchymal stem cells derived from the menstrual fluid; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3Characterization of trophospheres after 72 h culture compared to 2D adherent culture. mRNA expression of CDH1 (A), SNAIL (B), VIM (C), NANOG (D) and SOX2 (E) in trophospheres and 2D cultures was analyzed by qRT-PCR and normalized to GADPH and 18S housekeeping genes. (F) Tropho-sphere following 72 h of culture. Results are expressed as mean and SD of seven trophospheres and HTR-8/SVneo monolayer cultures per group. * p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. SD, standard deviation.
Figure 4In vitro 3D model of trophoblast invasion. (A) Schematic depicts the components of the model: MenSCs on the bottom of the plate as a monolayer of endometrial cells. Matrigel mimics the extracellular matrix, and trophospheres mimic the trophectoderm of a blastocyst that is transferred onto the Matrigel. (B,E) Invasion area of trophospheres co-cultured with MenSCs of nulliparous, multiparous, and PE women. Each area is expressed as relative to control invasion without MenSCs. Results are the means and SD of six MenSCs per group. (C,F) MMP2 and (D,G) MMP9 mRNA expression in trophospheres after invasion assay compared to the control invasion trophospheres. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Mann–Whitney U test. (H) Representative images of trophospheres invasion after 72 h of co-culture with MenSCs. MenSCs, mesenchymal stem cells derived from the menstrual fluid, SD, standard deviation.
Primer sequence and annealing temperatures (AT) for qRT-PCR.
| Gene | Sequence | AT °C |
|---|---|---|
| 18S Fw | GCCGCTAGAGGTGAAATTCTTGGA | 60 |
| 18S Rv | ATCGCCGGTCGGCATCGTTTAT | |
| GAPDH Fw | GTCAGGGTCTCTCTCTTCCT | 60 |
| GAPDH Rv | GCTCTCCTCTGACTTGAACA | |
| TBP Fw | CAC GAA CCA CGG CAC TGA T | 62 |
| TBP Rv | GTT GGT GGG TGA GCA CAA GG | |
| SOX2 Fw | AGC TAC AGC ATG ATG CAG GA | 60 |
| SOX2 Rv | GGT CAT GGA GTT GTA ATG CA | |
| NANOG Fw | CTG ATT CTT CCA CCA GTC CC | 60 |
| NANOG Rv | AGG TCT TCA CCT GTT TGT AG | |
| SNAIL Fw | CCC CAA TCG GAA GCC TAA CT | 62 |
| SNAIL Rv | GCT GGA AGG TAA ACT CTG GAT TAG | |
| IGFBP1 Fw | GAA GGA GCC CTC CCG AAT AG | 62 |
| IGFBP1 Rv | CCA TTC CAA GGG TAG ACG CA | |
| CDH1 Fw | CTGCCAATCCCGATGAAATTG | 60 |
| CDH1 Rv | TCCTTCATAGTCAAACACGAGC | |
| VIM Fw | AGTCCACTGAGTACCGGAGAC | 62 |
| VIM Rv | CATTTCACGCATCTGGCGTTC | |
| LIF Fw | GTTTCCTCCAAGGCCCTCT | 60 |
| LIF Rv | TGTTTCCAGTGCAGAACCAA |