| Literature DB >> 36012081 |
Agnieszka Ptak1, Agnieszka Dębiec-Bąk1, Małgorzata Stefańska1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess if there are any objective changes in the viscoelastic parameters of the erector spinae muscle after Vojta stimulation. The study involved 22 healthy children at an average age of 7 months and with an Apgar score of 8-10 points, who were referred for rehabilitation due to a slight delay in the phases of psychomotor development. The first group consisted of 11 children with increased muscle tone (IMT) and the second group consisted of 11 children with non-increased muscle tone (nonIMT). All study participants received a one-time Vojta therapy session, which was continued for 4 weeks by parents at home. The viscoelastic parameters of the dorsal extensor muscle were measured three times. In the first study group, changes in the viscoelastic parameters of the extensor muscles of the back occurred immediately after the therapy at the first examination, whereas changes in the supporting and extensor function of the limbs occurred in both groups at the second examination. Analysis featuring an objective assessment allows physiotherapists to diagnose local changes in the viscoelastic parameters after the implementation of therapy. These studies are the first pilot studies to be continued with a 30- or 60-day follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: development; function; viscoelastic properties of the muscle
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36012081 PMCID: PMC9407813 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of the sample groups.
| IMT Group ( | nonIMT Group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| sex (F/M) | 3/8 | 5/6 | ||
| age [months] | 6.95 | 3.14 | 7.05 | 3.43 |
| Apgar score [points] | 9.27 | 1.10 | 9.73 | 0.65 |
IMT—increased muscle tone, nonIMT—non-increased muscle tone, F—female, M—male.
Figure 1Method for recruiting children to the project.
Myotonometric measurement values for the erector spinae in the group of participants with increased muscle tone (IMT) and the group of participants with non-increased muscle tone (nonIMT), obtained from each of the three measurements.
| IMT Group | nonIMT Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | SD | Mean | Median | SD | |
| Frequency 1 [Hz] | 21.04 | 21.90 | 4.27 | 22.70 | 22.80 | 2.55 |
| Frequency 2 [Hz] | 19.98 | 20.20 | 2.59 | 22.55 | 22.90 | 2.06 |
| Frequency 3 [Hz] | 21.96 | 22.40 | 1.94 | 21.79 | 22.50 | 2.42 |
| Elasticity 1 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.23 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 0.24 |
| Elasticity 2 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 0.18 |
| Elasticity 3 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 1.02 | 0.24 |
| Stiffness 1 [N/m] | 582.70 | 556.00 | 135.61 | 578.36 | 555.00 | 87.07 |
| Stiffness 2 [N/m] | 460.82 | 500.00 | 114.96 | 582.09 | 608.00 | 90.50 |
| Stiffness 3 [N/m] | 586.89 | 592.00 | 88.86 | 605.27 | 546.00 | 167.07 |
| Relaxation 1 [ms] | 8.84 | 9.05 | 1.86 | 9.14 | 9.10 | 1.56 |
| Relaxation 2 [ms] | 10.95 | 10.30 | 1.96 | 8.98 | 8.90 | 1.52 |
| Relaxation 3 [ms] | 8.90 | 9.00 | 1.46 | 9.14 | 9.80 | 2.16 |
| Creep 1 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.15 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.09 |
| Creep 2 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.11 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.09 |
| Creep 3 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.14 |
IMT—increased muscle tone, nonIMT—non-increased muscle tone, 1, 2, 3—examination number.
The significance of differences in the analysed parameters between the group of children with increased muscle tone (IMT) and the group of children with non-increased muscle tone (nonIMT), calculated for each measurement (measurements 1, 2, 3).
| IMT Group | Measurement | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Frequency | 0.2810 | 0.0206 * | 0.8707 |
| Stiffness | 0.9307 | 0.0124 * | 0.7702 |
| Elasticity | 0.3377 | 0.4538 | 0.9106 |
| Relaxation | 0.6956 | 0.0182 * | 0.7829 |
| Creep | 0.7461 | 0.0123 * | 0.5709 |
IMT—increased muscle tone, nonIMT—non-increased muscle tone, * statistically significant value p < 0.05.
The significance of the differences between the measurements (p ANOVA) and p-values for the post hoc Scheffe’s test calculated for the comparison of measurements 1, 2, and 3 in each of the sample groups.
| IMT Group | nonIMT Group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurement: | Measurement: | |||||||
| 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 3 | |||
| Frequency | 0.0122 * | 0.0197 * | 0.8922 | 0.0472 * | 0.2087 | N | N | N |
| Stiffness | 0.0216 * | 0.0356 * | 0.9429 | 0.0657 | 0.9787 | N | N | N |
| Elasticity | 0.4665 | N | N | N | 0.5441 | N | N | N |
| Relaxation | 0.0088 * | 0.0172 * | 0.9596 | 0.0292 * | 0.4704 | N | N | N |
| Creep | 0.1166 | N | N | N | 0.1118 | N | N | N |
1, 2, 3—examination number; IMT—increased muscle tone, nonIMT—non-increased muscle tone, N—no statistical significance, * statistically significant p-value < 0.05.