| Literature DB >> 36011789 |
Yunjie Zhang1, Fan Su2, Yongjing Song1, Jinkui Lu3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between physical fitness index (PFI) and body mass index (BMI) of Tibetan children and adolescents in different high-altitude areas in Tibet, China.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; Tibetan; association analysis; body mass index; children and adolescents; high altitude
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36011789 PMCID: PMC9408390 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Sampling process of Tibetan children and adolescents in high altitude areas of China.
Comparison of PFI status of Tibetan children and adolescents of different genders at different altitudes (Median (P25, P75)).
| Age (yrs) | Boys | Girls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nyingchi | Lhasa | Nagqu | Nyingchi | Lhasa | Nagqu | |||||
| 13 | 0.03 (−1.6, 1.97) | −0.06 (−2.55, 1.62) | −5.17 (−7.55, −2.77) | 96.423 | <0.01 | −0.13 (−1.78, 1.22) | 0.03 (−1.29, 1.68) | −1.17 (−3.52, 0.27) | 8.679 | <0.05 |
| 14 | 0.03 (−1.70, 1.65) | −0.40 (−2.80, 1.66) | −1.37 (−3.50, 0.08) | 11.397 | <0.01 | −0.23 (−1.64, 1.01) | −0.02 (−1.46, 2.28) | −1.16 (−3.12, 0.39) | 10.120 | <0.01 |
| 15 | −0.42 (−2.82, 1.40) | −0.58 (−2.22, 1.56) | −2.88 (−4.56, −1.00) | 23.439 | <0.01 | −1.26 (−3.12, 0.73) | −1.08 (−3.30, 0.94) | −1.10 (−2.43, 0.48) | 0.068 | 0.967 |
| 16 | 0.65 (−1.04, 1.75) | 0.94 (−0.33, 2.38) | −1.38 (−3.07, 1.93) | 22.260 | <0.01 | −0.03 (−2.05, 1.44) | −1.08 (−3.30, 0.94) | −0.97 (−3.53, 1.62) | 11.465 | <0.01 |
| 17 | 0.38 (−0.78, 2.12) | 0.84 (−1.25, 2.00) | −0.66 (−2.67, 1.57) | 3.418 | 0.181 | −0.47 (−1.84, 1.45) | 0.57 (−0.86, 2.32) | −0.64 (−2.86, 0.40) | 16.482 | <0.01 |
| 18 | 0.56 (−0.80, 2.31) | 1.21 (−0.21, 2.37) | −1.60 (−3.23, 0.65) | 32.916 | <0.01 | −1.03 (−2.95, 1.19) | −0.48 (−1.89, 1.57) | 0.43 (−0.83, 1.92) | 7.690 | <0.05 |
Comparison of PFI of different nutritional status of Tibetan children and adolescents of different ages in high altitude areas (median (P25, P75)).
| Age (yrs) | Boys | Girls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malnutrition | Normal | Overweight and Obesity | Malnutrition | Normal | Overweight and Obesity | |||||
| 13 | −3.31 (−5.62, −0.70) | −1.11 (−3.51, 1.48) | −1.02 (−5.12, 0.37) | 12.712 | <0.01 | −3.02 (−4.85, −1.01) | −0.12 (−1.75, 1.4) | −0.55 (−2.53, 0.6) | 10.836 | <0.01 |
| 14 | −3.38 (−4.61, −1.49) | −0.10 (−1.82, 1.63) | −1.10 (−3.73, 0.75) | 36.462 | <0.01 | −1.71 (−3.52, −0.88) | −0.32 (−1.79, 1.18) | −0.43 (−2.02, 0.85) | 3.815 | 0.148 |
| 15 | −3.42 (−5.45, −1.20) | −0.64 (−2.78, 1.46) | −2.20 (−3.96, −1.12) | 18.654 | <0.01 | −1.28 (−4.21, −0.43) | −1.07 (−2.94, 0.93) | −1.34 (−3.2, 0.44) | 0.777 | 0.678 |
| 16 | −1.65 (−4.47, 0.88) | 0.61 (−1.53, 2.14) | 0.04 (−2.03, 0.80) | 3.874 | 0.144 | 1.41 (−0.44, 3.28) | −0.04 (−2.15, 2.10) | −0.44 (−1.99, 1.50) | 0.223 | 0.894 |
| 17 | −1.24 (−2.46, 1.07) | 0.51 (−1.04, 2.10) | −0.07 (−2.81, 1.73) | 10.833 | <0.01 | −0.37 (−2.12, 1.02) | 0.04 (−1.54, 1.99) | −0.74 (−2.30, 0.55) | 4.580 | 0.101 |
| 18 | 0.10 (−1.73, 1.32) | 0.38 (−1.46, 2.09) | −0.77 (−2.15, 1.21) | 1.634 | 0.442 | −0.83 (−2.06, 1.88) | −0.18 (−2.06, 1.74) | −0.65 (−2.21, 1.68) | 2.825 | 0.243 |
Curve regression analysis of body mass index and PFI of Tibetan children and adolescents of different genders at different altitudes.
| Gender | Area | Arguments/Constants | Standard Error | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys ( | Nyingchi | BMI | 1.886 | 0.245 | 2.034 | 7.691 | <0.01 |
| BMI2 | −0.042 | 0.005 | −2.032 | −7.683 | <0.01 | ||
| (Constants) | −20.577 | 2.726 | −7.547 | <0.01 | |||
| Lhasa | BMI | 2.788 | 0.341 | 2.693 | 8.171 | <0.01 | |
| BMI2 | −0.065 | 0.008 | −2.736 | −8.301 | <0.01 | ||
| (Constants) | −29.267 | 3.690 | −7.932 | <0.01 | |||
| Nagqu | BMI | 1.453 | 0.240 | 1.146 | 6.064 | <0.01 | |
| BMI2 | −0.024 | 0.005 | −0.876 | −4.634 | <0.01 | ||
| (Constants) | −20.837 | 2.698 | −7.723 | <0.01 | |||
| Girls ( | Nyingchi | BMI | 1.143 | 0.320 | 1.308 | 3.568 | <0.01 |
| BMI2 | −0.027 | 0.007 | −1.391 | −3.795 | <0.01 | ||
| (Constants) | −12.403 | 3.568 | −3.476 | <0.01 | |||
| Lhasa | BMI | 1.528 | 0.349 | 1.540 | 4.373 | <0.01 | |
| BMI2 | −0.035 | 0.008 | −1.556 | −4.419 | <0.01 | ||
| (Constants) | −16.365 | 3.845 | −4.256 | <0.01 | |||
| Nagqu | BMI | 0.523 | 0.303 | 0.547 | 1.728 | 0.085 | |
| BMI2 | −0.009 | 0.007 | −0.405 | −1.280 | 0.201 | ||
| (Constants) | −7.601 | 3.121 | −2.436 | 0.015 |
Figure 2The relationship between body mass index and PFI of Tibetan children and adolescents of different genders at different altitudes.