| Literature DB >> 36011615 |
Xiu-Fu Tian1, Run-Ze Wu2.
Abstract
With the deepening of population aging in China, chronic diseases are a major public health concern that threatens the life and health of nationals. Mobile health or mHealth can effectively monitor chronic diseases, which holds vital significance to the alleviation of social pressure caused by aging. To patients with chronic diseases, mHealth cannot give full play to its value, only when it is used in the long term. However, there is not yet research exploring mHealth continuance intention from the perspective of elders with chronic diseases. So, this research represents the first attempt to empirically analyze mHealth continuance intention from the perspective of elders with chronic diseases. The purpose of this research is to make up the research gap of the mHealth field and to put forward theoretical and practical implications based on research results. To obtain research data, a questionnaire was conducted. A total of 926 copies were collected online and 527 copies were collected offline. The structural equation model (SEM) was used for data analysis. Research results suggest that confirmation can significantly influence satisfaction, performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Meanwhile, confirmation and performance expectancy can significantly influence satisfaction. Additionally, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions can directly and significantly influence continuance intention. Among them, performance expectancy can directly influence continuance intention in the most significant way. This research provides solid evidence for the validity of the integrated model of ECM-ISC and UTAUT in the mHealth field, which can be a theoretical basis for mHealth operators' product R&D.Entities:
Keywords: ECM-ISC; UTAUT; continuance intention; elders with chronic diseases; mobile health
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36011615 PMCID: PMC9408135 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Research model.
Sample characteristics.
| Variable | Number | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 891 | 61.3% |
| Female | 562 | 38.7% | |
| Age | 60–65 | 792 | 54.5% |
| 66–70 | 474 | 32.7% | |
| 71–75 | 159 | 10.9% | |
| >75 | 28 | 1.9% | |
| Education | Middle school or below | 52 | 3.6% |
| Senior high school | 437 | 30.1% | |
| Junior college | 559 | 38.5% | |
| Undergraduate | 371 | 25.5% | |
| Postgraduate or above | 34 | 2.3% | |
| Usage history | <1 month | 441 | 30.4% |
| 1–6 months | 232 | 15.9% | |
| 6–12 months | 193 | 13.3% | |
| >1 year | 587 | 40.4% | |
| Experience | Yes | 1453 | 100% |
Standardized item loadings, CR, AVE and alpha values.
| Factor | Item | Standardized | Alpha | AVE | CR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effort expectancy (EE) | EE1 | 0.805 | 0.848 | 0.590 | 0.852 |
| EE2 | 0.805 | ||||
| EE3 | 0.726 | ||||
| EE4 | 0.733 | ||||
| Social influence (SI) | SI1 | 0.795 | 0.858 | 0.602 | 0.858 |
| SI2 | 0.781 | ||||
| SI3 | 0.752 | ||||
| SI4 | 0.773 | ||||
| Facilitating conditions (FC) | FC1 | 0.723 | 0.857 | 0.601 | 0.857 |
| FC2 | 0.796 | ||||
| FC3 | 0.775 | ||||
| FC4 | 0.803 | ||||
| Performance expectancy (PE) | PE1 | 0.741 | 0.882 | 0.658 | 0.885 |
| PE2 | 0.735 | ||||
| PE3 | 0.763 | ||||
| PE4 | 0.766 | ||||
| Confirmation (Con) | Con1 | 0.790 | 0.870 | 0.626 | 0.870 |
| Con2 | 0.792 | ||||
| Con3 | 0.813 | ||||
| Con4 | 0.848 | ||||
| Satisfaction (Sat) | Sat1 | 0.773 | 0.838 | 0.565 | 0.838 |
| Sat2 | 0.801 | ||||
| Sat3 | 0.794 | ||||
| Sat4 | 0.795 | ||||
| Continuance intention | CI1 | 0.803 | 0.869 | 0.628 | 0.871 |
| CI2 | 0.743 | ||||
| CI3 | 0.766 | ||||
| CI4 | 0.853 | ||||
| EE1 | 0.805 | ||||
| EE2 | 0.805 |
Matrix of correlation constructs and discriminant validity.
| EE | SI | FC | Con | Sat | PE | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 0.361 |
| |||||
|
| 0.297 | 0.263 |
| ||||
|
| 0.468 | 0.251 | 0.290 |
| |||
|
| 0.583 | 0.356 | 0.351 | 0.605 |
| ||
|
| 0.380 | 0.307 | 0.295 | 0.462 | 0.603 |
| |
|
| 0.564 | 0.534 | 0.482 | 0.269 | 0.657 | 0.666 |
|
Note: The square root of AVE (shown as bold at diagonal) and factor correlation coefficients.
Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT).
| CI | Con | EE | FC | PE | SI | Sat | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| 0.277 | ||||||
|
| 0.576 | 0.480 | |||||
|
| 0.485 | 0.296 | 0.301 | ||||
|
| 0.672 | 0.472 | 0.381 | 0.299 | |||
|
| 0.542 | 0.253 | 0.366 | 0.264 | 0.306 | ||
|
| 0.658 | 0.615 | 0.587 | 0.353 | 0.603 | 0.354 |
Fit indicators of the structural models.
| Model Fit Indices | χ2/DF | AGFI | RMSEA | IFI | GFI | CFI | NFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended value | 1–3 | >0.80 | >0.05 | >0.90 | >0.90 | >0.90 | <0.90 |
| Actual value | 2.846 | 0.946 | 0.036 | 0.971 | 0.955 | 0.971 | 0.956 |
Notes: χ2/d.f. chi-squared divided by degrees of freedom; AGFI, adjusted goodness-of-fit index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; IFI, incremental fit index; GFI, goodness-of-fit index; CFI, comparative fit index; NFI, normed fit index.
Figure 2Structural model results. Note: *** p < 0.001; the dotted line represents the insignificant path.
Results of the hypotheses tests.
| Path | Estimate | S.E. | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1a | Confirmation→Satisfaction | 0.304 | 0.029 | (9.843) *** | Supported |
| H1b | Confirmation→Performance expectancy | 0.457 | 0.027 | (14.576) *** | Supported |
| H1c | Confirmation→Effort expectancy | 0.478 | 0.030 | (15.736) *** | Supported |
| H2 | Satisfaction→Continuance intention | 0.171 | 0.035 | (4.812) *** | Supported |
| H3a | Performance expectancy→Satisfaction | 0.360 | 0.032 | (12.422) *** | Supported |
| H3b | Performance expectancy→Continuance intention | 0.383 | 0.035 | (12.046) *** | Supported |
| H4a | Effort expectancy→Continuance intention | 0.202 | 0.027 | (7.048) *** | Supported |
| H4b | Effort expectancy→Satisfaction | 0.319 | 0.027 | (11.293) *** | Supported |
| H5 | Social influence→Continuance intention | 0.273 | 0.023 | (11.199) *** | Supported |
| H6 | Facilitating conditions→Continuance intention | 0.214 | 0.026 | (8.828) *** | Supported |
Note: *** p < 0.001.