| Literature DB >> 36011132 |
Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi1, Hitham Alamin1, Radhakrishnan Sujatha2, Noor Zaman Jhanjhi3.
Abstract
Dementia is a condition in which cognitive ability deteriorates beyond what can be anticipated with natural ageing. Characteristically it is recurring and deteriorates gradually with time affecting a person's ability to remember, think logically, to move about, to learn, and to speak just to name a few. A decline in a person's ability to control emotions or to be social can result in demotivation which can severely affect the brain's ability to perform optimally. One of the main causes of reliance and disability among older people worldwide is dementia. Often it is misunderstood which results in people not accepting it causing a delay in treatment. In this research, the data imputation process, and an artificial neural network (ANN), will be established to predict the impact of dementia. based on the considered dataset. The scaled conjugate gradient algorithm (SCG) is employed as a training algorithm. Cross-entropy error rates are so minimal, showing an accuracy of 95%, 85.7% and 89.3% for training, validation, and test. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) is generated for all phases. A Web-based interface is built to get the values and make predictions.Entities:
Keywords: brain disorder; data imputation; dementia; performance measures; scaled conjugate gradient
Year: 2022 PMID: 36011132 PMCID: PMC9408174 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081474
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1Bibliometric network for dementia.
Figure 2Entire workflow.
Figure 3Feature statistics.
Figure 4Sample data.
Figure 5Sieve—group vs. age.
Figure 6Sieve—group vs. M/F.
Figure 7Model summary.
Figure 8Cross-entropy and error.
Figure 9Validation performance.
Figure 10Training ROC.
Figure 11Validation ROC.
Figure 12Test ROC.
Figure 13All ROC.
Training CM.
| Training Confusion Matrix | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output Class | 136 | 0 | 8 | 94.4% |
| 0 | 101 | 4 | 96.2% | |
| 1 | 0 | 11 | 91.7% | |
| 99.3% | 100% | 47.8% | 95.0% | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Target Class | ||||
Validation CM.
| Validation Confusion Matrix | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output Class | 26 | 1 | 3 | 86.7% |
| 1 | 20 | 3 | 83.3% | |
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 100% | |
| 96.3% | 95.2% | 25.0% | 85.7% | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Target Class | ||||
Test CM.
| Test Confusion Matrix | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output Class | 26 | 1 | 3 | 86.7% |
| 0 | 22 | 1 | 95.7% | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 100% | 91.7% | 33.3% | 89.3% | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Target Class | ||||
All CM.
| All Confusion Matrix | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output Class | 188 | 2 | 14 | 92.2% |
| 1 | 143 | 8 | 94.1% | |
| 1 | 1 | 15 | 88.2% | |
| 98.9% | 97.9% | 40.5% | 92.8% | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Target Class | ||||
Figure 14Web interface.