| Literature DB >> 36010534 |
Kun Wang1, Shanshan Wu1, Pan Li1, Nan Xiao1, Jiamin Wen1, Jinming Lin1, Siming Lu1, Xin Cai1, Yanan Xu1, Bing Du1.
Abstract
The incidence of hyperuricemia has increased globally due to changes in dietary habits. The sacha inchi oil press-cake is generally discarded, resulting in the waste of resources and adverse environmental impact. For the purpose of developing sacha inchi oil press-cake and identifying natural components with anti-hyperuricemic activities, we systemically investigated the underlying mechanisms of sacha inchi oil press-cake protein hydrolysates (SISH) in the hyperuricemic rat model. SISH was obtained from sacha inchi oil press-cake proteins after trypsin treatment, and 24 peptides with small molecular weight (<1000 Da) were identified. The results of animal experiments showed that SISH significantly decreased the serum uric acid (UA) level by inhibiting the xanthine oxidase (XOD) activity and regulating the gene expression related to UA production and catabolism in hyperuricemia rats, such as Xdh and Hsh. In addition, SISH attenuated the renal damage and reduced the gene expression related to inflammation (Tlr4, Map3k8, Pik3cg, Pik3ap1, Ikbke, and Nlrp3), especially Tlr4, which has been considered a receptor of UA. Notably, SISH reversed high purine-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis, particularly by enhancing the relative abundance of butyric acid-producing bacteria (unidentified_Ruminococcaceae, Oscillibacter, Ruminiclostridium, Intestinimonas). This research provided new insights into the treatment of hyperuricemia.Entities:
Keywords: gut microbiota; hyperuricemia; renal injury; sacha inchi oil press-cake protein hydrolyzates
Year: 2022 PMID: 36010534 PMCID: PMC9407120 DOI: 10.3390/foods11162534
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The molecular weight distribution and amino acid composition of SISH.
| SISH | ||
|---|---|---|
| Molecular weight distribution (%) | ||
| <1 kDa | 90.7 | |
| 1~2 kDa | 6.0 | |
| 2~5 kDa | 1.9 | |
| >5 kDa | 1.4 | |
| Amino acid composition (%) | ||
| Glutamate | 16.7 | |
| Aspartic acid | 12.6 | |
| Arginine | 10.8 | |
| Glycine | 6.6 | |
| Serine | 5.9 | |
| Lysine | 4.9 | |
| Valine | 5.8 | |
| Threonine | 5.0 | |
| Proline | 4.1 | |
| Leucine | 7.1 | |
| Alanine | 3.9 | |
| Tyrosine | 4.4 | |
| Isoleucine | 4.7 | |
| Phenylalanine | 2.2 | |
| Histidine | 2.2 | |
| Cysteine | 2.4 | |
| Methionine | 1.0 | |
| Essential amino acid content | 30.7 | |
| Hydrophobic amino acid | 24.9 |
The peptides sequence identified in SISH by HPLC/MS-MS analysis.
| Peptide Sequence | Mass-to-Charge Ratio | Retention Time | Relative | Peptide Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGGWSPLK | 423.2326 | 19.9 | 1.19 | 98 |
| WKPW | 308.6679 | 27.18 | 1.55 | 98 |
| FLTMEPR | 447.2341 | 19.97 | 5.29 | 97 |
| VVLDVK | 672.4325 | 16.53 | 4.1 | 97 |
| KVVL | 458.3361 | 21.18 | 7.86 | 97 |
| MVVKK | 302.6903 | 21.15 | 8.66 | 97 |
| LTGLNKL | 379.7451 | 20.72 | 3.76 | 97 |
| RLLVWELER | 607.3524 | 18.13 | 8.13 | 97 |
| KLSLEWWLK | 601.8453 | 17.98 | 2.9 | 96 |
| FVKLL | 310.2144 | 25.61 | 5.04 | 96 |
| LGDLGTKL | 408.7478 | 22.05 | 1.99 | 96 |
| LTGLDKL | 380.2367 | 22.14 | 3.34 | 96 |
| LFAEMDK | 427.2123 | 18.29 | 4.69 | 96 |
| EADGTLR | 381.1941 | 14.02 | 1.11 | 96 |
| VVLFK | 303.2065 | 19.5 | 2.1 | 95 |
| T(+42.01)LLNPR | 378.2258 | 17.03 | 1.04 | 95 |
| AYLTGLK | 383.2322 | 18.84 | 1.01 | 95 |
| WLPDVK | 379.2173 | 21.21 | 7.68 | 95 |
| VLWLPR | 392.2499 | 30.21 | 1.25 | 95 |
| RWQVWEDR | 587.7963 | 21.99 | 2.107 | 95 |
| TVLLPR | 349.7339 | 18.2 | 8.63 | 95 |
| LVRFPK | 380.2433 | 20.96 | 1.6 | 95 |
| TLLFGDK | 397.2278 | 22.5 | 1.56 | 95 |
| WSELVK | 381.2155 | 18.68 | 1.66 | 95 |
Figure 1Evaluation of SISH anti-hyperuricemic activities in hyperuricemic rats. (a) Body weight. (b) Serum uric acid (UA) levels. (c) Serum xanthine oxidase (XOD) activity. (d) Hepatic XOD activity. All data are expressed as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. the CD group; ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 vs. the MG group.
Figure 2The effects of SISH on renal damage in hyperuricemic rats. (a) The kidney indexes. (b) Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. (c) Serum creatinine (Cr) levels. (d) Photomicrographs of representative sections of kidneys. (e) Renal injury score. (f) Glomerular number in each group. All data are expressed as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. the CD group; # p < 0.05, and ## p < 0.01 vs. the MG group.
Figure 3The effects of SISH on the diversity and integrity of the gut microbiota in hyperuricemic rats. (a) Rarefaction curves. (b) Shannon index. (c) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). (d) Anosim and multi-response permutation procedure (MRPP) analyses. (e) Relative abundance at phylum levels. (f) The heatmap analysis at genus levels. All data are expressed as means ± SD. ** p < 0.01 vs. the CD group; # p < 0.05 vs. the MG group.
Figure 4The impacts of SISH on the serum metabolome of hyperuricemic rats. (a) Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot. (b) Venn diagram. (c) The numbers of differential metabolites. (d) The Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) scores plot. (e) A heatmap of differential metabolites potentially associated with hyperuricemia. (f) A heatmap of differential metabolites potentially associated with hyperuricemia disease for each treatment. (g) Spearman correlation analysis between the metabolites and the gut microbiota. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.01.
Figure 5The Effects of SISH on the renal transcriptome in hyperuricemic rats. (a) Venn diagram. (b) Heatmap for hierarchical cluster analysis of differential expression genes (DEGs) (fold change of ≥ 1.5 or ≤ −1.5, p < 0.05). (c) The principal component analysis (PCA) score plot. (d) Heatmap for genes involved in purine metabolism. (e) Spearman correlation analysis between the metabolites and genes related to purine metabolism. Differences were assessed by ANOVA. (f) Heatmap for genes involved in inflammatory responses. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.01.