| Literature DB >> 36010475 |
Yun-Fang Qian1,2,3, Ting Lin1, Xiao Liu4, Jiao Pan1, Jing Xie1,2, Sheng-Ping Yang1,2.
Abstract
The antioxidant and antibacterial properties of four essential oils (oregano essential oil (OEO), tea tree essential oil (TTEO), wild orange essential oil (WOEO), and clove leaf essential oil (CLEO)) were determined. The in-vitro experiment indicated that CLEO had the highest total phenolic content and DPPH scavenging activity, and OEO displayed the highest antibacterial effect, so they were applied to maintain the quality of shrimp for further study. In-situ study, the total viable counts of shrimp were inhibited from 9.05 log CFU/g to 8.18 and 8.34 log CFU/g by 2% of OEO and CLEO treated alone on 10 d. The melanosis ratio was also retarded from 38.16% to 28.98% and 26.35% by the two essential oils. The inhibitory effects of OEO and CLEO on the increase of PPO activity, weight loss, and TCA-soluble peptides, and the decreasing tendency of whiteness, the contents of myofibrillar and sarcoplasmic proteins were also founded. The samples treated with 1% OEO + 1% CLEO had better quality than those treated alone. Therefore, the combination of OEO and CLEO had a synergistic effect, which displayed the highest efficiency to prevent the melanosis, bacterial growth, and protein hydrolysis of shrimp.Entities:
Keywords: TCA-soluble peptides; clove leaf essential oil; mechanism; melanosis ratio; oregano essential oil; protein degradation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36010475 PMCID: PMC9407435 DOI: 10.3390/foods11162475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Total phenolic content (TPC) and DPPH scavenging activity (%) of different preservatives.
| Concentration ( | OEO | TTEO | WOEO | CLEO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | 10% | 20.97 ± 0.22 | 20.29 ± 0.35 | 13.34 ± 0.51 | 21.12 ± 0.01 |
| DPPH scavenging activity (%) | 0.5% | 42.28 ± 1.15 | 22.76 ± 1.15 | 27.64 ± 1.15 | 79.67 ± 1.15 |
| 2% | 73.11 ± 0.54 | 28.22 ± 0.27 | 54.55 ± 0.54 | 84.85 ± 0.54 | |
| 10% | 84.55 ± 3.45 | 61.79 ± 2.30 | 65.85 ± 1.15 | 87.80 ± 2.30 |
Note: oregano essential oil (OEO), tea tree essential oil (TTEO), wild orange essential oil (WOEO), and clove leaf essential oil (CLEO).
The sensitivity of the four bacterial species to the four essential oils.
| Bacterium | Presser-Vatives | Concentrations (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.025 | 0.005 | Negative Control | ||
| OEO | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | + | − | − | |
| TTEO | ++ | + | + | − | − | − | − | |
| WOEO | ++ | + | + | − | − | − | − | |
| CLEO | ++++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | − | − | |
| OEO | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | + | − | − | |
| TTEO | ++ | ++ | + | − | − | − | − | |
| WOEO | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
| CLEO | ++++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | − | − | |
| OEO | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | + | + | − | |
| TTEO | ++ | ++ | + | − | − | − | − | |
| WOEO | +++ | ++ | + | − | − | − | − | |
| CLEO | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | + | + | + | − | |
| OEO | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | − | − | − | |
| TTEO | ++ | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
| WOEO | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
| CLEO | ++++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | + | − | |
Note: “++++” means extremely sensitive (bacteriostatic diameter ≥ 20 mm); “+++” means quite sensitive (15 mm ≤ bacteriostatic diameter < 20 mm); “++” means sensitive (10 mm ≤ bacteriostatic diameter < 15 mm); “+” means slightly sensitive (8 mm < bacteriostatic diameter < 10 mm); “−” means not sensitive (bacteriostatic diameter ≤ 8 mm).
Figure 1Changes of total viable counts (A), psychrotrophic bacterial counts (B), H2S-producing bacterial counts (C), TVB-N (D), weight loss (E) and TCA-soluble peptide (F) of refrigerated Pacific white shrimp treated with OEO and CLEO at 4 °C. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments within the same storage time.
Figure 2Changes of the content of sarcoplasmic protein (A) and myofibrillar protein (B) of refrigerated Pacific white shrimp treated with OEO and CLEO at 4 °C. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments within the same storage time.
Figure 3Changes of whiteness and a* of cephalothorax (A,C) and abdomen (B,D) of refrigerated Pacific white shrimp treated with OEO and CLEO at 4 °C. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments within the same storage time.
Figure 4Photograph (A) and changes of melanosis ratio (B) and PPO activity (C) of refrigerated Pacific white shrimp treated by OEO and CLEO at 4 °C. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3). Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) among different treatments within the same storage time.
Figure 5Schematic diagram of the antibacterial and anti-melanosis activity of OEO + CLEO on Pacific white shrimp during cold storage.