| Literature DB >> 36009674 |
Atef Oreiby1, Ayman S Seada2, Mohamed F Abou Elazab3, Walied Abdo4, Mohamed Kassab5, Yamen Hegazy1, Hazim O Khalifa6,7,8, Tetsuya Matsumoto6.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate a sheeppox outbreak in a highly susceptible naive sheep population in Kharsit village, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. Moreover, to compare commercial sheeppox vaccines, the Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines, as emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. In December 2018, a sheeppox outbreak occurred in a flock of 65 sheep upon the purchase of an apparently healthy ewe from outside the village. This ewe showed a systemic disease with cutaneous lesions after a few days, thereafter more cases began to appear. Cutaneous lesions in other sheep in the flock in the form of macules, papules, and scabs were common in wool-less areas of the body, in addition to fever and respiratory disorders. Postmortem findings revealed the congestion of visceral organs with apparent gross pathology of the lung. Biopsies of cutaneous lesions and visceral organs were collected, and sheeppox was identified by histopathology and transmission electron microscopy, which showed the existence of sheeppox cells and intracytoplasmic brick-shape sheeppox virions. The Romanian strain and RM-65 vaccines were used for the emergency vaccination for two different groups of animals and the third group was left as a control group. Serum samples were collected before vaccination as well as 21 days post-vaccination, and serum protein fractionation analysis was performed for all groups. The outbreak ended after 2.5 months, the cumulative incidence was 66.2%, and the overall case fatality was 51.1%. There was significantly higher protection against sheeppox infection and mortalities among RM-65 vaccine immunized group compared to Romanian strain vaccine-immunized animals at p < 0.05. RM-65-vaccinated animals did not show sheeppox cases or mortalities, compared to Romanian strain-vaccinated animals, which had mild pox signs in 78% of animals and case fatality of 35.7%. The serum protein analysis also indicated the superior performance of the RM-65 vaccine; it increased the level of α1-globulin and β-globulin compared to the Romanian strain, which increased the level of β-globulin only. The current study shows a better performance of the tested RM-65 than the Romanian strain vaccine for emergency vaccination against sheeppox under field conditions. These findings point to the validity of emergency vaccination against sheeppox and the importance of the comparative field evaluation of vaccines; however, wide-scale studies are required for further evaluation. Future investigation of whether the Romanian strain itself or vaccine-production-related issues are responsible for these findings is required.Entities:
Keywords: Egypt; control; emergency vaccination; outbreak; sheeppox
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009674 PMCID: PMC9405467 DOI: 10.3390/ani12162084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Gross pathology of sheeppox lesions: papular sheeppox lesions spread over the inner aspect of the fatty tail (A), variable size papules in the inner thigh region (B), dry thick scab lesions over the inner aspect of the fatty tail (C), abnormal udder showing apparent gross sheeppox lesions (D), variable size papules on the upper and lower lips (E), and black patch spots over the lung of a deceased sheep (F).
The incidence and case fatality of sheeppox among different groups of sheep.
| Groups | Total | Diseased (%) | Case Fatality (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-vaccinated healthy Lambs | 15 | 12 (80%) a | 12 (100%) b |
| Non-vaccinated diseased Adults | 17 | 17 (100%) a | 5 (29.4%) a |
| SPV Romanian strain-vaccinated adult animals | 18 | 14 (78%) a | 5 (35.7%) a |
| SPV RM-65-vaccinated adult animals | 15 | 0 (0%) b | 0 (0.0%) |
| Total | 65 | 43 (66.2%) | 22 (51.1%) |
In the same column, the categories with different small letters are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Cutaneous and pulmonary sections of infected sheep with SPV. Figures (A–C) represent the skin, and Figures (D–F) represent the lung. Epidermal layer showing ballooning degeneration with macrovesicles formation associated with the presence of intra-epithelial sheeppox cells (arrowheads), (B) dermis showing dermatitis associated with the necrosis of the collagen with marked inflammatory cell infiltration of mostly macrophages and histocytes and sheeppox cells (arrowhead) and (C) showing the necrosis of hair complex with marked infiltration of sheeppox cells. (D,E) Bronchial section showing the stratification of the lining epithelium associated with the degeneration of epithelial cells, the hyperplasia of the basal epithelial cells (tailed-arrow), and intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies (arrows). (F) Feature of interstitial pneumonia associated with marked thickening of the interalveolar septa and the marked infiltration of macrophages, histocytes, and sheeppox cells (arrowhead), A letter indicates atelectatic alveolar spaces, H&E, bar = 50 µm.
Figure 3Electron microscopy of skin showing intra-cytoplasmic brick-shaped sheeppox virions.
Protein fractionation of the healthy, diseased, and vaccine A- and B-immunized animals.
| Animals | Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | Albumin | α1-Globulin | α2-Globulin | β-Globulin | γ-Globulin | A/G Ratio | |
| Healthy before vaccination | 6.53 ± 0.18 a | 3.20 ± 0.06 a | 0.10 ± 0.02 c | 0.38 ± 0.05 b | 0.75 ± 0.04 b | 2.10 ± 0.18 a | 0.97 ± 0.09 a |
| Diseased | 6.83 ± 0.29 a | 2.94 ± 0.09 b | 0.31 ± 0.07 a | 0.77 ± 0.10 a | 0.89 ± 0.04 ab | 1.90 ± 0.12 a | 0.76 ± 0.05 b |
| Romanian strain-vaccinated | 6.20 ± 0.60 a | 2.67 ± 0.17 c | 0.14 ± 0.02 bc | 0.42 ± 0.10 b | 0.98 ± 0.19 a | 2.00 ± 0.13 a | 0.76 ± 0.05 b |
| RM-65-vaccinated | 6.65 ± 0.15 a | 3.05 ± 0.04 ab | 0.18 ± 0.00 b | 0.48 ± 0.03 b | 0.96 ± 0.05 a | 2.00 ± 0.04 a | 0.85 ± 0.02 b |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Mean values in the same row bearing different superscript letters were significantly differ at p < 0.05.