| Literature DB >> 36009667 |
Federica Obber1, Roberto Celva1, Martina Libanora1, Graziana Da Rold1, Debora Dellamaria1, Piergiovanni Partel2, Enrico Ferraro3, Maria Santa Calabrese4, Lia Morpurgo5, Simone Roberto Rolando Pisano6, Carlo Vittorio Citterio1, Rudi Cassini5.
Abstract
Since 1995, the Alpine chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) population of the Dolomites has been affected by sarcoptic mange with considerable management concerns. In this study, 15 years (2006-2020) of passive surveillance and demographic data were analyzed in order to describe a mange outbreak. Furthermore, an enhanced passive surveillance protocol was implemented in order to evaluate the efficiency of ordinary vs. enhanced surveillance protocol in identifying dead chamois in the field and in reaching a correct diagnosis. Our results confirm the role of mange as a determining factor for chamois mortality, while stressing the importance of a wider view on the factors affecting population dynamics. The enhanced passive surveillance protocol increased the probability of carcass retrieval and identification of the cause of death; however, its adoption may be too costly if applied for long periods on a wide scale. Passive surveillance, in both ordinary and enhanced surveillance protocol, should encompass the use of other strategies in the future to study the eco-epidemiology of the disease in wild Caprinae.Entities:
Keywords: Sarcoptes scabiei; caprinae; chamois; density; mortality; sarcoptic mange; surveillance
Year: 2022 PMID: 36009667 PMCID: PMC9405409 DOI: 10.3390/ani12162077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1The study area divided by mange zones. CAU = Cauriol-Val Cigolera; LIT = Val Maggiore-Litegosa; LSO = Lagorai Sud Occidentale; OLT = Oltro; PAL = Pale; PAN = Paneveggio; ROL = Val Maggiore-Rolle; SCA = Scanaiol-Boalon; STE = Val Moena-Lagorai-Stelune; TOT = Totoga; VFM = Vette Feltrine Meridionali; VFS = Vette Feltrine Settentrionali. Cavallazza Area (CA) is represented with red color; the territory of the PPSM Nature Park is represented with green color.
Figure 2Trend in population density (grayscale). The year of the mange index case (MIC) is represented in red.
Index case, duration of the epidemic wave and decline rate calculated for each mange zone.
| Mange Zone | Surface (ha) | Index | Pre-Epidemic | Post-Epidemic Stock 2 | Epidemic Wave Duration (Years 3) | Decline Rate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N Heads | Density | N Heads | Density | |||||
| PAN | 9504.737 | 2005 | 342 | 3.60 | 231 (2011) | 2.43 | 7 | 32% |
| PAL | 7579.657 | 2007 | 313 | 4.13 | 95 (2013) | 1.25 | 7 | 69% |
| SCA | 9285.647 | 2007 | 277 | 2.98 | 112 (2015) | 1.21 | 9 | 60% |
| CAU | 7154.198 | 2008 | 434 | 6.07 | 165 (2013) | 2.31 | 6 | 62% |
| ROL | 3909.907 | 2010 | 232 | 5.93 | 69 (2013) | 1.76 | 4 | 70% |
| LIT | 7434.002 | 2010 | 543 | 7.30 | 356 (2014) | 4.79 | 5 | 34% |
| STE | 8852.382 | 2011 | 639 | 7.22 | 397 (2020) | 4.48 | 10 | 38% |
| OLT | 2679.183 | 2011 | 172 | 6.42 | 133 (2014) | 4.96 | 4 | 23% |
| LSO | 6595.381 | 2012 | 288 | 4.37 | 232 (2015) | 3.52 | 4 | 19% |
| TOT | 1321.142 | 2014 | 54 | 4.09 | 35 (2014) | 2.65 | 1 | 35% |
| VFS 4 | 5282.734 | 2015 | 148 | 2.80 | 23 (2019) | 0.44 | 5 | 84% |
| VFM 4 | 3057.262 | 2016 | 173 | 5.66 | 41 (2018) | 1.34 | 3 | 76% |
1 The value corresponds to the last census available before the year of the index case. 2 The value corresponds to the year with the lowest count during the period following the index case and characterized by a continuous detection of mange cases (no more than one year without cases). 3 Number of years from the index case to the year with the lowest count. In 2020, few mange cases were still reported in PAN, LIT, STE and VFM, but these cases represent a potential comeback or the last cases of the epidemic wave, and related chamois populations already started their stock recovery. 4 The Vette Feltrine zone was split into VFS and VMS in 2011.
Figure 3Trend in the number of mange cases (grayscale) detected through ordinary surveillance. The year of the mange index case (MIC) is represented in red.
Dead chamois found during ordinary surveillance by mange zone and year (number of mangy cases into brackets) and % of mangy cases out of the total dead chamois.
| Mange Zone | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | TOTAL | Percentage of Mange Cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAN | 8 (7) | 13 (13) | 26 (23) | 26 (7) | 5 (4) | 4 (2) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (2) | 3 (3) | 2 (1) | 91 (62) | 68.1% |
| PAL | 1 | 4 (3) | 11 (8) | 25 (6) | 12 (8) | 10 (6) | 1 | 8 (6) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 76 (37) | 48.6% |
| SCA | 10 | 4 (2) | 8 (2) | 17 (5) | 15 (6) | 16 (10) | 23 (10) | 7 (4) | 8 (1) | 3 (3) | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 116 (43) | 37.1% |
| CAU | 6 | 1 | 9 (1) | 19 (4) | 18 (8) | 6 (3) | 10 (2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 74 (18) | 24.3% |
| ROL | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 2 (2) | 3 (3) | 2 (2) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 25 (8) | 32.0% |
| LIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2) | 1 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2) | 1 (1) | 6 (6) | 100% |
| STE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 0 | 1 (1) | 10 (10) | 10 (10) | 19 (19) | 6 (6) | 0 | 4 (4) | 52 (52) | 100% |
| OLT | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 (3) | 8 (7) | 8 (6) | 8 (6) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 (22) | 62.8% |
| LSO | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 2 (2) | 0 | 1 (1) | 1 | 1 (1) | 1 (1) | 2 | 12 (7) | 58.3% |
| TOT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 (2) | 3 (2) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 (1) | 1 | 12 (5) | 41.6% |
| VFS | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 (2) | 27 (19) | 38 (33) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 81 (54) | 66.6% |
| VFM | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 (3) | 8 (8) | 3 (3) | 1 (1) | 3 (1) | 29 (16) | 55.2% |
| TOTAL | 29 (7) | 25 (18) | 66 (34) | 99 (22) | 57 (30) | 46 (29) | 48 (23) | 31 (17) | 25 (12) | 24 (17) | 45 (34) | 73 (60) | 17 (12) | 9 (8) | 15 (7) | 609 (330) | 54.1% |
Figure 4Number of dead chamois collected from 2006 to 2020, classified by the cause of death. Bars represent annual total snowfall in centimeters.
Figure 5Monthly distribution of male and female chamois carcasses (2006–2020) found in the entire study area using ordinary passive surveillance, classified by mange status. Animals for which sex could not be assigned are not represented.
Results of the census of CA with classification by age and gender and the number of found carcasses in the last column. The data displayed for the year 2008 are corrected by adding up the number of chamois counted at the intensive census in July with the number of chamois found dead (brackets).
| Year | Kids | Juveniles | Female Adults | Male Adults | Undetermined | Tot | Found Carcasses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 37 (1) | 21 | 60 (10) | 21 (4) | 15 (15) | 154 (30) | 34 (20-5-9) |
| 2009 | 24 | 5 | 34 | 15 | 0 | 78 | 34 (11-13-10) |
| 2010 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 44 | 5 (3-2-0) |
| 2011 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 35 | - |
| 2012 | 22 | 10 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 64 | - |
| 2013 | 13 | 10 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 56 | - |
Figure 6Monthly distribution of chamois carcasses (2006–2020) found in CA during enhanced surveillance, classified by mange status.
Number of found carcasses, estimated number of dead animals and percentage of animals not detected by passive surveillance in the mange zones and in the CA.
| Mange Zone | Pre-Epidemic Stock | Post-Epidemic Stock | Epidemic Wave Duration | Number of Carcasses Found | Estimated Minimum Number of Dead Animals | Estimated Number of Animals Not Detected by Surveillance | Percentage of Dead Animals Not Detected by Surveillance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N Heads | N Heads | Years | |||||
| PAN | 342 | 231 | 7 | 82 | 111 | 29 | 26.1% |
| PAL | 313 | 95 | 3 | 40 | 149 | 109 | 73.2% |
| SCA | 277 | 112 | 9 | 101 | 165 | 64 | 38.8% |
| CAU | 434 | 165 | 6 | 63 | 269 | 206 | 76.6% |
| ROL | 232 | 69 | 4 | 9 | 163 | 154 | 94.5% |
| LIT | 543 | 356 | 5 | 3 | 187 | 184 | 98.4% |
| STE | 639 | 397 | 7 | 42 | 177 | 135 | 76.3% |
| OLT | 172 | 133 | 4 | 27 | 39 | 12 | 30.8% |
| LSO | 288 | 232 | 4 | 4 | 56 | 52 | 92.9% |
| TOT | 54 | 35 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 17 | 89.5% |
| VFS | 148 | 23 | 5 | 71 | 125 | 54 | 43.2% |
| VFM | 173 | 41 | 3 | 15 | 132 | 117 | 88.6% |
| Ordinary surveillance (All mange zones) | 3964 | 1889 | 459 | 2075 | 1616 | 77.9% | |
| Enhanced surveillance (CA) | 154 | 35 | 4 | 74 | 119 | 45 | 37.8% |